Georgia · Nonprofit
TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC
TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC (Georgia) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $31,668 to it, the largest being THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 63% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2024
- $2.9M
- Funders on record
- 2
- Grants received
- $32k
- Net assets
- $75M
What Turner Institute of Ecoagriculture Inc does
Mission
Institute's mission is to research, develop, practice, and disseminate sustainable strategies and techniques for conserving ecosystems, agriculture, and rural communities. Institute will achieve this mission by using its livestock, land, scale, and biological diversity to research and demonstrate how ranching operations can meet economic and production objectives while protecting and enhancing natural resource and conservation values of large landscapes. In a broad sense this concept can be referred to as ecoagriculture, an emerging area of scientific study regarding how sustainable agriculture and ranching can be conducted across diverse landscapes while maintaining ecosystem services and integrity, and contributing towards solutions for local and global issues (e.g., climate change, native species and habitat loss, environmental contamination, water depletion, food production, and rural economies) rather than exacerbating them.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
1. Evaluation of cougar predation and bear kleptoparasitism on vermejo, new mexico. Over the last 15 years, in response to drought, declining range and riparian conditions, and projected dry conditions in the future, vermejo has worked to determine the carrying capacity for large ungulates (e.g., elk and american bison) on the ranch during an average dry year. While ecological balance with forage resources is the driving factor in setting elk population objectives at vermejo, a sustainable elk hunting program, wildlife viewing opportunities, and overall ecological function, including healthy populations of predators, are also important considerations. Understanding large predator populations and their role in regulating elk (and other ungulate) populations is an important, but relatively unexplored question at vermejo. Black bear predation can be a major source of mortality on elk calves. Similarly, cougars, especially males, select for elk calves during summer months. Black bears may benefit from cougar kills through kleptoparasitism, thereby negatively affecting cougars. The institute is undertaking this study to document cougar prey selection on vermejo and the influence of…
$112,063 spent7% of program spending2. Influence of finishing system and finishing location on the carcass traits, sensory attributes, and phytochemical richness of bison meat. Recent work by the institute demonstrated that pasture-finished bison concentrated higher levels of compounds considered favorable for human health in their meat when compared to pen-finished animals. Pasture-finished bison also appeared to have better metabolic health than pen-finished bison. Adaptive grazing of bison on rangelands has the potential to be regenerative and produce positive ecosystem effects. This outcome, coupled with growing consumer demand for sustainably raised, healthier meat products has led to an increase in livestock producers implementing agro-ecological management, including rotational grazing and pasture-finishing of animals, to improve ecological, animal, and human health. This study aims to compare the effect of forage diversity (on pasture), finishing system (pasture versus pen), finishing location (geographic), and feed type (free choice versus total mixed ration) on animal metabolic health and meat nutrient density. Analysis will be completed on the following: crude fat, metabolomics, fatty acid composition and…
$182,369 spentof which $100,000 as grants$1,751,343 earned by the program11% of program spending3. Movement and habitat use of reintroduced bolson tortoises in southern new mexico. The bolson tortoise is the largest and rarest of the six gopherus species native to north america. Today, however, fewer than 2,500 individuals remain in the wild, all of which are restricted to discontinuous basins in the mapim sub-province of north-central mexico, representing >90% extirpation from their pleistocene range. The turner conservation trust operates the only large-scale ex situ breeding program aimed at conserving bolson tortoises and establishing assurance populations within their pleistocene range in the united states. B the specific objectives of our research includes:a. Compare vital rates and survivorship between released and captive juvenile tortoises as a function of size, environmental factors, and habitat characteristicsb. Evaluate habitat use and movement patterns as a function of environmental conditions and habitat featuresc. Provide recommendations to the bolson tortoise recovery project and the usfws for future tortoise reintroductions.4. Population dynamics and life history characteristics of rio grande cutthroat trout (rgct) in the upper rio costilla watershed, new…
$55,000 spent3% of program spendingOther program services, not described on the e-filed return.
$1,301,898 spent79% of program spending
The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,651,330.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $76M to $75M (−1%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
38% of TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (67% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Carter Kruse
Executive director
Board chair
Re Turner Iii
Board chair/director
As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 63% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
63% of TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $12k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Georgia, across 1 state.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $20k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 482 science & tech nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 482 science & tech nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Organizations like TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Georgia
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
76% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Part of a family of 3 related entities
- Sandhills Ranch Properties - McGinley LLC · disregarded
- Turner Conservation Trust · exempt
- Turner Foundation Inc · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC?
- TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC (Georgia) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $31,668 to it, the largest being THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 63% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $31,668 in grants to TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC.
- Who is the largest funder of TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC?
- THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM is the largest funder on record, with $20,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like TURNER INSTITUTE OF ECOAGRICULTURE INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Georgia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing