Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

1772 Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
87
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Arts & Culture$13MEnvironment$3.7MPhilanthropy$2.4MCommunity Improvement$1.6MCrime & Legal$564kFood & Nutrition$518kEducation$230kRecreation & Sports$214kOther$0
02FY2024 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $104k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $475k
  • $50k–250k25 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$10,000
Median grant
27
States reached
$81M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$500,000
COASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA$500,000
MAINE PRESERVATION$125,000
PRESERVE RHODE ISLAND$125,000
Individual grant recipient$125,000
Individual grant recipient$125,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE$125,000
PRESERVATION TRUST OF VERMONT$125,000
CENTER FOR HEIRS' PROPERTY PRESERVATION$100,000
DADE HERITAGE TRUST$100,000
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION$100,000
HERITAGE OHIO$100,000
THE GEORGIA TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION$100,000
HISTORIC NEW ENGLAND$100,000
GBH$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $750 → 9%VIRTUOUS WOMEN OF LIFE ACADEMY: $5k → 8%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $500 → 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $500 → 9%WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of 1772 Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

1772 Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 96 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

96 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 51 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

96
146

Total granted

$16M
$5.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+21%

Still filing today

78%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $648k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementEducationRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +113%
  • NM
    NATIONAL MAIN STREET CENTER INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $793k · revenue +342%
  • MP
    MAINE PRESERVATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $673k · revenue +70% · 39% of their budget

Funded once

  • LT
    LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $525k · revenue +68%
  • NJ
    NEW JERSEY HISTORIC TRUST
    one grant, 2019 · $301k
  • CT
    CONNECTICUT TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $201k · revenue +226%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Historical Preservation Inc
—
2
Hartford Preservation Alliance Inc

Hartford Preservation Alliance's primary mission is to preserve and revitalize Hartford's unique architectural heritage and neighborhood character.

Arts & Culture
3
National Council for Preservation Education
—
4
Association for the Preservation of Va Antiquities

To preserve, promote and serve as an advocate for virginia's irreplaceable historic places for cultural, economic and educational benefits for everyone.

Arts & Culture
5
Preservation Delaware
Arts & Culture
6
Hartford Historic Preservation Foundation Inc

To preserve historically significant properties in the hartford community, purchasing same, if possible, and maintaining them as historical landmarks.

Philanthropy
7
Trust for Architectural Easements

The Trust will be a leading force in the preservation of America's architectural heritage. The Trust accepts donations of historic preservation easements to protect buildings.

Arts & Culture
8
New Haven Preservation Trust Incorporated

Primary purpose is to save and preserve buildings in New Haven, Connecticut through ongoing involvement with the city, Yale University and its neighborhoods, including educational activities such as walking tours of downtown New Haven and…

—
9
Preservation America Trust
Arts & Culture
10
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
11
Cohasset Conservation Trust Inc
—
12
The Palmetto Trust for Historic Preservation Inc

To protect and preserve buildings of architectural and historial significance in South Carolina.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Preservation Society of Newport County and the most unlike its peers is Sowega Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsLocal History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…Affordable Housing Developm…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Public Library OperationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Local Food System Organizat…Community Arts Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%53%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%1/211
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,354

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

193 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 193 of the 279 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

18
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
61
Early backer (in before they grew)
190/193
Grantees still filing
124/193
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $625,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNew Hampshire Preservation Alliance — $625,000 · OtherNew Hampshire Preservation AllianceIndividual grant recipient — $600,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWATERFRONT HISTORIC AREA LEAGUE (WHALE) — $583,275 · OtherWATERFRONT HISTORIC AREA LEAGUE (WHALE…Penn Center Inc — $370,500 · OtherNEW JERSEY HISTORIC TRUST — $301,000 · OtherHISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $275,000 · Other+97 more — $4,673,596 · Other+97 morePRESERVE RHODE ISLAND — $806,049 · Arts & CulturePRESERVE RHODE ISLANDMAINE PRESERVATION — $673,050 · Arts & CultureMAINE PRESERVATIONPRESERVATION TRUST OF VERMONT INC — $610,000 · Arts & CulturePRESERVATION TRUST OF VERMONT INCSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC — $515,250 · Arts & CultureSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF M…GEORGIA TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION INC — $375,000 · Arts & CultureGEORGIA TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESER…NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $350,000 · Arts & CultureThe L'Enfant Trust — $280,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Wilmington Foundation Inc — $260,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC MACON FOUNDATION INC — $257,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION — $250,000 · Arts & Culture+38 more — $2,557,000 · Arts & Culture+38 moreTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,600,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBL…LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC — $525,000 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST ALLIANC…Scenic Hudson Inc — $412,500 · EnvironmentScenic Hudson IncFAIRMOUNT PARK CONSERVANCY — $209,162 · EnvironmentFAIRMOUNT PARK CON…Madison-Morgan Conservancy Inc — $201,000 · Environment+16 more — $833,500 · Environment+16 moreCOASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC — $2,260,000 · PhilanthropyCOASTAL COMM…BLACK HISTORY IN ACTION FOR CAMBRIDGEPORT — $217,942 · PhilanthropyBLACK HISTOR…+3 more — $140,000 · Philanthropy+3 moreNATIONAL MAIN STREET CENTER INC — $792,500 · Community ImprovementPRESERVATION ALLIANCE OF NEW ORLEANS IN — $150,000 · Community ImprovementSouth Carolina Association for Community Economic Development — $125,000 · Community ImprovementStrawberry Mansion Community Development Corporation — $121,200 · Community ImprovementHERITAGE OHIO INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementGERMANTOWN UNITED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 · Community Improvement+4 more — $45,220 · Community ImprovementCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation — $550,000 · Crime & LegalKEAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $83,700 · EducationWEGOJA FOUNDATION — $60,000 · EducationTuskegee University — $50,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE POMFRET PUBLIC LIBRARY — $22,500 · EducationPROVIDENCE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $15,000 · EducationLINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY — $15,000 · EducationCENTER FOR PRESERVATION INITIATIVES — $14,500 · EducationVermont Law School — $10,000 · Education+3 more — $16,000 · Education
Other$8,053,371Arts & Culture$6,933,349Environment$3,781,162Philanthropy$2,617,942Community Improvement$1,383,920Crime & Legal$550,000Education$286,700

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC — $2,260,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $1,600,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPRESERVE RHODE ISLAND — $806,049 over 6y, 22% of budgetNATIONAL MAIN STREET CENTER INC — $792,500 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetMAINE PRESERVATION — $673,050 over 5y, 39% of budgetNew Hampshire Preservation Alliance — $625,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetPRESERVATION TRUST OF VERMONT INC — $610,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation — $550,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC — $525,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MARYLAND ANTIQUITIES INC — $515,250 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc — $412,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetGEORGIA TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION INC — $375,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetPenn Center Inc — $370,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $350,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe L'Enfant Trust — $280,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetHISTORIC CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $275,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetHistoric Wilmington Foundation Inc — $260,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetHISTORIC MACON FOUNDATION INC — $257,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetCINCINNATI PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION — $250,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetBLACK HISTORY IN ACTION FOR CAMBRIDGEPORT — $217,942 over 2y, 33% of budgetFAIRMOUNT PARK CONSERVANCY — $209,162 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCLEVELAND RESTORATION SOCIETY INC — $205,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetCONNECTICUT TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION INC — $201,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetMadison-Morgan Conservancy Inc — $201,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW ENGL — $200,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPROVIDENCE REVOLVING FUND — $185,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetThe Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina Inc — $175,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetAlabama African American Civil Rights Heritage Sites Consortium — $165,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetPRESERVATION BUFFALO NIAGARA — $150,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetPRESERVATION ALLIANCE OF NEW ORLEANS IN — $150,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetSLAVE DWELLING PROJECT INC — $138,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetRESTORE MOBILE INC — $135,000 over 3y, 43% of budgetNATIONAL PRESERVATION PARTNERS NETWORK — $125,000 over 3y, 50% of budgetSouth Carolina Association for Community Economic Development — $125,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetStrawberry Mansion Community Development Corporation — $121,200 over 1y, 11% of budgetButte Citizens for Preservation and Revitalization — $121,000 over 2y, 79% of budgetAS 220 — $115,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC — $106,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetNEWPORT RESTORATION FOUNDATION — $101,212 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDADE HERITAGE TRUST INC — $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWaterfront Historic Area League of New Bedford Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetFARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHERITAGE OHIO INC — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHISTORIC NATCHEZ FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetTHE NATIONAL TRUST FOR SCOTLAND FOUNDATION USA INC — $99,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetNEVADA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $99,000 over 2y, 29% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Trust for Hi…The Rhode Island Comm…The Champlin Foundati…Van Beuren Charitable…Amica Companies Found…Geraldine R Dodge Fou…Washington Trust Co C…Rhode Island Council …South Carolina Humani…The Nature ConservancyUnited Way of Rhode I…Historic Preservation…
National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United StatesDC69.5× affinity44 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · The Champlin Foundation · Van Beuren Charitable Foundation Inc · Amica Companies Foundation · Geraldine R Dodge Foundation Inc · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · Rhode Island Council for the Humanities · South Carolina Humanities Council Inc · The Nature Conservancy · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Historic Preservation Education Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 1772 Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 240%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • The Landmark Trust Usa Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Raritan Headwaters Association — 94% of income from government
  • Opportunity Works Connecticut Inc — 81% of income from government
  • Society for the Preservation of Maryland Antiquities Inc — 50% of income from government
  • Hunterdon Land Trust — 48% of income from government
  • Museum of African American History Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Eastern Connecticut Conservation District Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Community Mediation Maryland Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Preservation Trust of Vermont Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Connecticut Forest & Park Association — 16% of income from government
  • Vermont Law School — 14% of income from government
  • Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Hamilton Partnership for Paterson Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Washington County Community Action Council Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
  • Society for the Preservation of New Engl — 2% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
  • Wyndham Land Trust Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Horizon Wings Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Friends of Hopewell Valley Open Space — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
24get no government money at all
70report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 1772 Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to 1772 Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 279 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines