Loading…
Loading…
New Mexico · Nonprofit
GROWING UP NEW MEXICO INC (New Mexico) is funded by 63 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $8,609,375 in grants to it, the largest being WK Kellogg Foundation ($1,217,244). 46 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
GROWING UP NEW MEXICO INC has grown faster than half of the 2,564 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,564 philanthropy nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
98% of GROWING UP NEW MEXICO INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (84% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
$2k from 2 funders in 2025, up from $398k and 12 in 2017.
12 of 63 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of GROWING UP NEW MEXICO INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 63 funders by total. Association, not causation.
GROWING UP NEW MEXICO INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 14% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 50% · 2018 28% · 2019 25% · 2020 16% · 2021 29% · 2022 25% · 2023 21% · 2024 33% · 2025 67% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
39% of GROWING UP NEW MEXICO INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 73% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
GROWING UP NEW MEXICO INC is locally rooted: 60% of its grant income comes from New Mexico funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 63 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
85% of spending goes to programs.
92%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 63funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing