How much did BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE grant in FY2024?

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE reported 162 grants totaling $18,533,260 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE based?

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE is based in OH.

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE

See mission statement on schedule o BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE ("bmi") is organized exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, including the utilization of science, the scientific method and research for the benefit and education of mankind.

$19M

Granted FY2024

162

Grants

Communities

$12M

Largest

01What you fund

0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Philanthropy$99MEducation$15MHealth$5.7MCommunity Improvement$4.1MScience & Tech$1.2MArts & Culture$979kHuman Services$929kAnimals$408kEnvironment$377kOther$8.5M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

collectionsbradburytake responsibilityhuman-induced globalglobal warmingclimate changetransportation

2020

food pantrieskipp columbusmbcministriesnetcarevulnerablecivil rights

2021

medal honorrmyccongressional medallacdclegacyinternal revenuehonor states

2022

fidelityparrotsmaterialsfirefightersadditiondiscountshardship

2023

corporateemerald youthwesleyancarlsbadselectchristian ministryseeds

2024

corporateuscwesleyanownershipnationhumanestudents stem

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 162 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k59 grants · $407k
$10k–50k86 grants · $1.5M
$50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
$250k+5 grants · $14M

$11,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.8B

Total assets

Largest grants

COLUMBUS FOUNDATION$12,190,494
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$726,509
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION$706,067
OAK RIDGE SCHOOLS$275,000
OAK RIDGE FOUNDATION$250,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO$219,218
COLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION$204,650
EMORY VALLEY CENTER$151,000
EAST TENNESSEE FOUNDATION$147,500
UNITED WAY OF BONNEVILLE$118,000
TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE FOR SURVIVORS$106,097
IDAHO ADVANCED ENERGY$94,000
NEW ALBANY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$71,900
FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$65,139
TNFIRST$60,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $924k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$128M · 185 repeat orgs$7.7M to everyone else

185 repeat relationships — 118 still active in FY2024, 67 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

185

183

Total granted

$128M

$7.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%

+56%

Still filing today

86%

74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $661k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TC
THE COLUMBUS FOUNDATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $92M · revenue +53%
ME
METRO EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL
3× · 2018–2021 · $7.6M · revenue +96% · 71% of their budget
LA
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION
6× · 2019–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +101%

Funded once

NI
NEUROTECH INSTITUTE
one grant, 2021 · $5.0M
SR
SNAKE RIVER BASIN INNOVATION DISTRICT
one grant, 2023 · $55k
NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +707%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education

University of Denver

A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education

University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education

Council of Independent Colleges

The council of independent colleges is an association of nonprofit independent colleges and universities, state- based councils of independent colleges, and other higher education affiliates, that works to support college and university…

—

Oklahoma City University

Oklahoma city university prepares all learners to create, lead and serve.

Education

United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—

Colorado State University Foundation

Colorado state university foundation receives, manages and invests gifts in support of csu.

Education

University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education

Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy

University Corporation for Atmospheric

University corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational activities, and of…

Science & Tech

Central Indiana Corporate

The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…

Community Improvement

Lewis & Clark College

The mission of lewis & clark college is to know the traditions of the liberal arts, to test their boundaries through ongoing exploration, and to hand on to successive generations the tools and discoveries of this quest. by these means, the…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nnemap Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pro Musica Chamber Orchestra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%4/423

the rest of the field

6,875/73,883

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

348 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

109

Early backer (in before they grew)

338/348

Grantees still filing

280/348

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$99,154,317Education$14,542,402Other$10,227,234Health$5,698,773Community Improvement$4,088,041Science & Tech$1,188,116Arts & Culture$979,288

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Ingram-White Castle FoundationOH67.9× affinity35 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ingram-White Castle Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · L Brands Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Los Alamos National Laboratory · Anchorum St Vincent · Siemer Family Foundation · Columbus Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · East Tennessee Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · United Way of Northern New Mexico

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 820460529 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Battelle Memorial Institute?

Find your warmest path to Battelle Memorial Institute through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

348 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Battelle Memorial Institute?

More from the funding graph

BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

348 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Battelle Memorial Institute?

More from the funding graph