· Private foundation
Mumford Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GROWING UP NEW MEXICO | $4,000 |
| WQPT QUAD CITIES PBS | $2,000 |
| BUTTERWORTH CENTER & DEEREWIMAN HOUSE | $2,000 |
| SANTA FE BOTANCIAL GARDEN | $1,500 |
| LIVING LANDS & WATERS | $1,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA & WESTERN ILLINOIS | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| FAIRHAVEN MINISTRY OF FAITH HOPE & LOVE | $1,000 |
| THE FOOD DEPOT | $1,000 |
| NAHANT MASH EDUCATIONAL CENTER | $1,000 |
| THINK NEW MEXICO | $1,000 |
| FIGGE ART MUSEUM | $500 |
| PEOPLE PROGRAM | $500 |
| SYMPHONY CHORUS OF NOLA | $500 |
| SF CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GUGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +57%
- MAMARRIAGE AND FAMILY COUNSELING OF R I CO7× · 2017–2023 · $13k · revenue +3%
- GDGROW DAT YOUTH FARM7× · 2017–2023 · $10k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY QUAD CITIESone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -11%
- NCNorthshore Community Fundone grant, 2020 · $3k
- NMNew Mexico Childrens Foundationone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of lyrica baroque is to support a diverse community of students, teachers, artists, institutions and audiences of all ages through education, collaboration and performance. lyrica baroque seeks to promote the extraordinary…
Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.
We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.
Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…
We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).
The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.
Prepares gifted graduates of prestigious music programs for successful careers in orchestras and ensembles.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Think New Mexico and the most unlike its peers is Fairhaven Ministry of Faith Hope & Love. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC ↗
- Who funds MARRIAGE AND FAMILY COUNSELING OF R I CO ↗
- Who funds GROW DAT YOUTH FARM ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds FIGGE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LIVING LANDS & WATERS ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF A STUDIO IN THE WOODS ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FAIRHAVEN MINISTRY OF FAITH HOPE & LOVE ↗
- Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Northshore Food Bank ↗
- Who funds SYMPHONY CHORUS OF NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds Amigos Bravos Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY QUAD CITIES ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · The Abeles Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Scott County Regional Authority · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Bolene Charitable Trust · Grant & Virginia Brissman Foundation Nfp · Gale Family Foundation · John H Hart Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mumford Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.