Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pritzker Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54M
Granted FY2024still arriving
288
Grants FY2024still arriving
39
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$54MRecreation & Sports$48MHealth$44MPhilanthropy$28MHuman Services$21MCommunity Improvement$16MCrime & Legal$8.5MPublic Benefit$8.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 288 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k93 grants · $2.0M
  • $50k–250k122 grants · $14M
  • $250k+50 grants · $38M
$75,000
Median grant
39
States reached
$281M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$10,000,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$3,000,000
THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP$1,500,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO (AKA JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROP$1,200,000
ALLIANCECHICAGO$1,050,000
THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC$1,000,000
THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC (AKA TSNE MISSIONWORKS)$1,000,000
CHILDREN AT RISK INC$1,000,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE (AKA HARVARD UNIVERSITY)$1,000,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$1,000,000
ROCKWOOD LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$950,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$800,000
THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC$703,450
ALLIANCECHICAGO$700,000
MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC$666,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $21.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CALIFORNIA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION INC: $500k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $300k → 10%STATE POWER FUND: $150k → 19%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $750k → 16%CALIFORNIA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION INC: $500k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $300k → 10%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $417k → 16%CHILD TRENDS INCORPORATED: $190k → 8%CALIFORNIA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION INC: $500k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $300k → 10%SISTER SONG INC: $275k → 13%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $209k → 16%CHILD TRENDS INCORPORATED: $150k → 8%CALIFORNIA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION INC: $500k → 10%SISTER SONG INC: $150k → 13%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $209k → 16%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC: $666k → 19%CALIFORNIA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION INC: $400k → 10%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $208k → 16%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC: $333k → 19%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $208k → 16%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC: $167k → 19%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC: $167k → 19%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC: $167k → 19%MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC: $167k → 19%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $1.5M → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $1.5M → 14%ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $250k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $250k → 14%ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $250k → 14%NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $250k → 8%NATIONAL BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $225k → 8%ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $200k → 14%ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $200k → 14%CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC: $250k → 16%CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC: $250k → 16%ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $200k → 14%CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC: $250k → 16%CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC: $250k → 16%CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC: $240k → 16%FIRST FOCUS ON CHILDREN: $240k → 14%FIRST FOCUS ON CHILDREN: $150k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS: $200k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $150k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $150k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $150k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $350k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $149k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$224M · 205 repeat orgs$20M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

205 repeat relationships — 117 still active in FY2024, 88 since wound down; 72 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

205
71

Total granted

$224M
$9.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+23%

Still filing today

85%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic BenefitCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $48M · revenue +33%
  • THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $12M · revenue +31%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $9.0M · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO (AKA JEWISH UNITED FUNDJEWISH FED
    one grant, 2023 · $2.2M
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO (DBA JEWISH UNITED FUNDJEWISH FE
    one grant, 2020 · $1.2M
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS (DBA ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM &
    one grant, 2023 · $600k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.

—
4
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
5
National Perinatal Information Center

The national perinatal information center (npic) is dedicated to the improvement of perinatal health through comparative data analysis, program evaluation, health services research and professional continuing education.

Health
6
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
7
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
8
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
9
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
10
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
11
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
12
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Medicine Policy Research Group and the most unlike its peers is Coalition for Rainbow Alliances Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Women & Girls Leadership De…Lgbtq+ Community SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity College Foundatio…Senior Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Faith-Based Social ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Developm…Jewish Community Organizati…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%47%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%3/309
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,256

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

296 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 296 of the 365 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

18
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
51
Early backer (in before they grew)
292/296
Grantees still filing
193/296
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EARLY CHILDHOOD INVESTMENT CORPORATION — $3,817,200 · OtherSTART EARLY — $3,325,500 · OtherTEXPROTECTS-THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN — $2,760,000 · Other+93 more — $71,402,010 · Other+93 moreNorthwestern University — $48,171,621 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern Universi…American Heart Association Inc — $9,003,202 · HealthAmerican Heart…ALLIANCECHICAGO — $6,568,000 · HealthALLIANCECHICAG…AIDS Foundation of Chicago — $2,798,687 · HealthAIDS Foundatio…THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $2,612,450 · HealthTHE PRAXIS PRO…CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,523,411 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,325,000 · Health+22 more — $9,116,021 · Health+22 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $5,000,000 · EducationPresident and…Vanderbilt University — $3,550,000 · EducationVanderbilt Un…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $2,850,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UN…The Education Trust Inc — $2,169,200 · EducationThe Education…THE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO — $2,000,000 · EducationTHE LATIN SCH…SCHOOLHOUSE CONNECTION — $1,390,000 · EducationGROUNDWORK OHIO — $1,200,000 · EducationJAMES B HUNT JR INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP & POLICY FDN — $1,185,000 · EducationNATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES INSTITUTE INC — $1,083,700 · EducationMILTON ACADEMY — $1,050,000 · Education+18 more — $7,340,848 · Education+18 moreTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP — $3,300,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDRE…POLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC — $2,933,600 · Human ServicesPOLICY INST…California Children and Families Foundation Inc — $2,879,510 · Human ServicesCalifornia …ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $2,478,920 · Human ServicesADVOCATES F…MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC — $1,892,875 · Human ServicesMARYLAND FA…ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES — $1,818,501 · Human ServicesZERO TO THR…CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC — $1,350,000 · Human ServicesCENTERING H…TIDES CENTER — $1,060,000 · Human ServicesCHILD TRENDS INC — $936,965 · Human Services+14 more — $5,795,445 · Human Services+14 moreThe Chicago Community Trust — $4,050,000 · PhilanthropyThe Chica…JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $2,400,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UN…Rockwood Leadership Institute — $1,879,031 · PhilanthropyRockwood …NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION — $1,878,600 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA …ARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,391,000 · PhilanthropyARKANSAS …JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $1,200,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FE…MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND — $1,160,000 · PhilanthropyMOMSRISIN…GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC — $1,047,700 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC — $905,162 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $765,000 · PhilanthropyStriveTogether Inc — $700,000 · Philanthropy+8 more — $3,229,637 · Philanthropy+8 moreTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $11,757,134 · Community ImprovementTHE BRIDGESPAN GROUP INC — $987,500 · Community ImprovementINNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK — $650,250 · Community Improvement+2 more — $492,000 · Community Improvement
Other$81,304,710Recreation & Sports$48,171,621Health$32,946,771Education$28,818,748Human Services$24,445,816Philanthropy$20,606,130Community Improvement$13,886,884

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNorthwestern University — $48,171,621 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $11,757,134 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $9,003,202 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCECHICAGO — $6,568,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $5,000,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust — $4,050,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University — $3,550,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTART EARLY — $3,325,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP — $3,300,000 over 3y, 36% of budgetPOLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC — $2,933,600 over 5y, 42% of budgetCalifornia Children and Families Foundation Inc — $2,879,510 over 4y, 50% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $2,850,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAIDS Foundation of Chicago — $2,798,687 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetTEXPROTECTS-THE TEXAS ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN — $2,760,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN — $2,625,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $2,612,450 over 4y, 10% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $2,478,920 over 5y, 41% of budgetCouncil for a Strong America — $2,476,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $2,400,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $2,400,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetCORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING — $2,394,585 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc — $2,169,200 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CHILD SUCCESS INC — $2,101,450 over 5y, 24% of budgetTHE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO — $2,000,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHeartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights — $1,935,159 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetMARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC — $1,892,875 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSafer Foundation — $1,880,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetRockwood Leadership Institute — $1,879,031 over 3y, 12% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION — $1,878,600 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetWITHINREACH — $1,875,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES — $1,818,501 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,642,119 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS — $1,621,552 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetP5 STRATEGIES — $1,600,000 over 4y, 57% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,523,411 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,391,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSCHOOLHOUSE CONNECTION — $1,390,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetCENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC — $1,350,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $1,325,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY ALLIANCE INC — $1,315,010 over 5y, 69% of budgetWISCONSIN EARLY CHILDHOOD ASSOCIATION INC — $1,231,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL HEAD START ASSOCIATION — $1,208,235 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $1,200,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGROUNDWORK OHIO — $1,200,000 over 3y, 86% of budgetJAMES B HUNT JR INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP & POLICY FDN — $1,185,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND — $1,160,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $1,111,616 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE — $1,100,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliance for Early Su…Annie E Casey Foundat…The Irving Harris Fou…Polk Bros Foundation …WK Kellogg FoundationMichael Reese Health …United Way of Metropo…Chicago Foundation fo…Circle of Service Fou…Robert R McCormick Fo…The David and Lucile …Lloyd a Fry Foundation
Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy AllianceDC90.9× affinity44 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy Alliance · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Irving Harris Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Michael Reese Health Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Chicago Foundation for Women · Circle of Service Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pritzker Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Maryland Family Network Inc — 66% of income from government
  • Child Trends Inc — 50% of income from government
  • Ctdata Collaborative — 35% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Third Sector Capital Partners Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
55report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pritzker Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pritzker Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 365 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home