How much did WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY grant in FY2024?

WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY reported 81 grants totaling $3,041,189 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY based?

WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY is based in NM.

WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY

Wesst is a home to entrepreneurs providing a support system of consulting, training, incubation, and lending to help new mexicans strengthen and grow their small businesses through sustainable business models, financial empowerment, and job creation.

$3.0M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$96k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k61 grants · $1.2M
$50k–250k20 grants · $1.3M

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants

COVENANT SCHOOLS OF RIO RANCH$96,498
THE SUNNYSIDE DAYCARE$80,000
BUILDING BRIDGES CHILD DEVELOPMENT$80,000
WEE KIDS KOUNTRY KLUB INC$80,000
HAPPY DAYS CHRISTIAN DAY CARE & PRE$80,000
LA LUZ EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER$80,000
COVENANT SCHOOL DEL NORTE$63,395
RAINBOW CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER IN$60,000
EL GRITO INC$60,000
ALBUQUERQUE FOURSQUARE CHURCH DBA E$60,000
LITTLE BUTTERFLIES LEARNING CENTER$60,000
PERALTA'S PLAYHOUSE INC$60,000
3-D ENTERPRISES INC$60,000
LITTLE TUMBLEWEED DAYCARE NEW BEGIN$60,000
ROBERT CHAVEZ YOUTH DEVELOPMENT$52,371

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $512k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 17%. 37% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

New Mexico Christian Childrens Home

To be people who love god and love our neighbors, working in partnership with family, church and community to improve the lives of disadvantaged individuals, following the biblical call of jesus to "go and do likewise" while inspiring…

Human Services

Albuquerque Preschool Cooperative

To provide quality pre-school education and childcare for children ages 2 to 6 years old in an un-hurried, pressure-free environment.

Education

Denton City-County Day School

Denton City County Day School provides quality, affordable childcareto families in Denton County. Our mission is to provide qualitypre-kindergarten education and loving care to children ages 2 through 5 years. Our vision is that all DCCDS…

Human Services

The Childrens Center

The children's center provides early child care and education in a vibrant learning community that emphasizes personal development, social relationships and family involvement, in order to establish a foundation for lifelong learning.

Education

Lopez Children's Center

Preschool & childcare for rural lopez island. our mission is to provide an environment that nurtures the school, emotional, cognitive and physical development of young children.

—

Fallbrook Child Development Center Inc

We provide quality early childhood education and day care for children ages one to five years. We strive to promote each childs intellectual, emotional, social, and physical development in preparation for kindergarten.

Human Services

Child Education Center

Child Education Center is a licensed daycare serving children ages 6 weeks thru 6 years.

Human Services

Linda Vista Children's Center

Our goal is to help in the development of children who are secure, confident, and competent. We provide an environment that is emotionally warm and nurturing, physically safe, and cognitively challenging. It is our desire to work as a team…

—

Early Years Development Center Inc

Provide full time child care service for ages six months through five years of age, and after school child care service for children up to twelve years old.

Human Services

Sugar & Spice Child Care Center

Child care development a program of learning, caring and play for infants, toddlers, pre-schoolers and after school children.

Human Services

Sunshine Valley Child Care

Sunshine Valley Child Care is a non-denomination Christian Child Care Center that offers children 16 months to 5 1/2 years a variety of activities and opportunties to learn and grow.

—

Community Day Care & Preschool

Daycare for children

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Garcia Street Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Explora Science Center & Children's. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/82

the rest of the field

10%

613/5,987

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/21

Grantees still filing

19/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,829,525Human Services$511,714Education$200,000Health$40,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Pnm Resources Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HAPPY DAYS CHRISTIAN DAY CARE & PRE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 850288865 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HAPPY DAYS CHRISTIAN DAY CARE & PRE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency?

Find your warmest path to Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency?

More from the funding graph

WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency?

More from the funding graph