· Public charity
Vitalogy Foundation
The foundation supports the efforts of non-profit organizations doing commendable work in the fields of community health, the environment, arts & education and social change.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 51 grants below total $2,188,196 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,407,196 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $219,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $678k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+1 grant · $471k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP | $470,553 |
| OHANA FEST STORYTELLERSC3 PRESENTS | $132,607 |
| WASHINGTON INNOCENCE PROJECT | $110,000 |
| THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| TREEHOUSE | $100,000 |
| SEATTLE CENTER FOUNDATION | $70,000 |
| SUPPORT AND FEED INC | $70,000 |
| MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE SOUTH HILLS | $50,000 |
| VETSAIDINC | $50,000 |
| PATH WITH ART | $50,000 |
| THE ACTORS' GANG | $50,000 |
| WAR CHILD USA INC | $50,000 |
| ARTIST MENTORSHIP PROGRAM | $50,000 |
| ROOTED RESILIENCY | $50,000 |
| SEATTLE ACADEMY OF ARTS | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $996k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Vitalogy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
57 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $708k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GPGLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC6× · 2017–2022 · $555k · revenue +47%
PATH WITH ART7× · 2018–2024 · $334k · revenue +155%
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2024 · $325k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- KCKING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICESone grant, 2019 · $200k
- DDONORSCHOOSEORGone grant, 2018 · $125k · revenue +1%
- TYTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871)graduatedone grant, 2018 · $105k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Our mission is to shift policies and systems to increasingly value and embed supports for caregiver and infant mental health in the places where families are during pregnancy and early childhood. perigee is organized & operated as a…
Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People for the American Way and the most unlike its peers is Soapbox the Feminist Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
191 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 191 of the 206 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUILDING CHANGES ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Arts Corps ↗
- Who funds PATH WITH ART ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Downtown Emergency Service Center ↗
- Who funds MONTANA POOL SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACTOR'S GANG INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds REAL CHANGE HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds WILD LOVE PRESERVE ↗
- Who funds Spruce Street School ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION NW ↗
- Who funds EVERY MOTHER COUNTS ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds APOLLO THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN CANCER AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds WELD SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds DOHENY STATE BEACH INTERPRETIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds VETSAID INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PURPOSE DIGNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds ARTIST MENTORSHIP PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT AND FEED INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Cancer Association ↗
- Who funds RAVALLI COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT ↗
- Who funds THE ALANO CLUB OF PORTLAND OREGON ↗
- Who funds MISSOULA FOOD BANK & COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HIGH ATLAS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Real Progress Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Artsfund · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · Tides Foundation · Raikes Foundation · Grousemont Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vitalogy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Operation New Uniform Inc — 100% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Living Classrooms Foundation — 7% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Artist Mentorship Program — 2% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Vitalogy Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Vitalogy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.