· Private foundation
Bertin Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $106k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $487k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $477k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDS | $649,000 |
| HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| HUNTSMAN MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE | $250,000 |
| ROOM TO READ | $150,000 |
| SAPREA | $125,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $52,000 |
| INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| G20 INTERFAITH FORUM | $50,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $50,000 |
| WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY | $40,000 |
| LATINOS IN ACTION | $38,000 |
| MENTORS INTERNATIONAL | $35,300 |
| LIFE MOVES | $32,500 |
| CONCERN WORLDWIDE | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $137k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RTROOM TO READ9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +23%
- MIMentors International8× · 2017–2025 · $855k · revenue +261%
- HCHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2025 · $750k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- RARise and Rebuild Foundationone grant, 2019 · $54k · revenue +15%
- PCPRIMARY CHILDREN'S CANCERone grant, 2017 · $20k
- STSHELTER THE HOMELESS INCone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
We empower children who are sick, disadvantaged, or living with disabilities through life-changing programs that provide medical care, mobility, education, and support to live without limits.
The organization's mission is to relentlessly pursue a better world for every child. unicef usa advances the global mission of unicef by rallying the american public to support the world's most vulnerable children. through fundraising,…
Unitus Labs provides consulting support loans grants and investments to partner organizations who are implementing innovative market-based approaches to reducing global poverty with potential for very large scale impact.
Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…
The mission of globus relief is to improve the delivery of healthcare worldwide by gathering, processing and distributing surplus medical and health supplies to charities at home and abroad.
The mission of Splash International and its subsidiaries is to ensure clean water for children. Splash partners with governments and local organizations to deliver sustainable water, sanitation, hygiene, and menstrual health programs in…
None
Virtue foundation's mission is to increase awareness, inspire action, and render assistance through initiatives on healthcare, education, and women and justice programs, as well as innovative work in research and analytics.
Sign partners with overseas surgeons to build sustainable orthopaedic capacity by donating education, instruments, and implants. by working with teaching hospitals and hosting educational conferences worldwide, sign equips surgeons to heal…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc and the most unlike its peers is Zimbabwecare Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
- Who funds Mentors International ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Saprea ↗
- Who funds Academy for Creating Enterprise ↗
- Who funds CharityVision International ↗
- Who funds HALE CENTRE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds LATINOS IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Davis Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Utah & Idaho ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds Rise and Rebuild Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC ↗
- Who funds BOOK OF MORMON CENTRAL ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds Davis Technical College Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STELLA H OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN JOSE CHILDRENS MUSICAL THEATER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Beesley Family Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · University Impact · The Ashton Family Foundation · The Kahlert Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · My Brother's Keeper Foundation · Bill and Pat Child Family Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bertin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.