· Private foundation
Akonadi Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 108 grants below total $3,546,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,936,300 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $390,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k24 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k61 grants · $912k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+3 grants · $900k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Movement Strategy Center | $300,000 |
| Black Organizing Project | $300,000 |
| Young Womens Freedom Center | $300,000 |
| Black Organizing Project | $120,000 |
| Communities United For Restorative Youth Justice (CURYJ) | $115,000 |
| East Bay Community Foundation | $110,000 |
| East Bay Community Foundation | $100,000 |
| Center For Empowered Politics Education Fund | $100,000 |
| Youth Law Center | $100,000 |
| W. Haywood Burns Institute | $100,000 |
| Genders and Sexualities Alliance Network | $100,000 |
| Youth ALIVE! | $97,000 |
| Young Women's Freedom Center | $95,000 |
| Movement Strategy Center | $95,000 |
| Ella Baker Center for Human Rights | $95,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
63 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2023, 13 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $418k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBThe Black Organizing Project Inc4× · 2018–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +186%
- YWYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER3× · 2021–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +127%
- CUCOMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ4× · 2018–2023 · $484k · revenue +378%
Funded once
- PAPUBLIC ADVOCATES INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $88k · revenue +104%
- CFCalifornians For Justice Education Fundgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $88k · revenue +143%
- BABlack Arts Movement Business District Community Development Corporation of Oaklandone grant, 2022 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.
Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.
A broad based network of local institutions - congregations, synagogues, non-profits and civic associations - that serve as a foundation for public relationships, leadership development and action around issues that affect our communities.
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Through coaching and group facilitation, leaders of color heal from racism, develop skills to identify & interrupt racism in personal leadership, organizational practices & policies, and produce antiracist solutions in partnership with…
The Oakland Institute, an independent policy think tank, works to support global struggles for Indigenous rights, human rights, and land rights and to promote public participation and fair debate on critical social, economic, and…
Our mission is to empower and unite the vibrant Chinatown community through social, cultural, and economic development, improving the quality of life for all residents. We achieve this by preserving heritage, promoting inclusivity, and…
FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…
Urban Habitat democratizes power and advances equitable policies to create a just and connected Bay Area for low-income communities of color. We confront structural inequities impacting historically disenfranchised communities. Through…
California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…
The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Women's Freedom Center and the most unlike its peers is Rosenberg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
141 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 141 of the 195 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Black Organizing Project Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Parent Leadership Action Network PLAN ↗
- Who funds ELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds Genders & Sexualities Alliance Network DBA GSA Network ↗
- Who funds W HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds URBAN STRATEGIES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Asian Pacific Environmental Network ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds Network on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children ↗
- Who funds Anti Police-Terror Project Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ALIVE ↗
- Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds Californians For Justice Education Fund ↗
- Who funds BLACK CULTURAL ZONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds EastSide Arts Alliance ↗
- Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
- Who funds SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds ROSENBERG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds East Bay Alliance For A Sustainable Economy ↗
- Who funds ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Lower Bottom Playaz Inc ↗
- Who funds OSCAR GRANT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOVE NOT BLOOD CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds East Oakland Youth Development Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · The Zellerbach Family Foundation · Stupski Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The James Irvine Foundation · Walter and Elise Haas Fund · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Kenneth Rainin Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Akonadi Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Akonadi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.