Skip to content
The Zellerbach Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Zellerbach Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
224
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$7.9MCrime & Legal$5.6MHuman Services$2.8MPhilanthropy$2.4MCivil Rights$2.0MYouth Development$2.0MEducation$1.7MCommunity Improvement$1.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 224 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k49 grants · $235k
  • $10k–50k106 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k69 grants · $4.4M
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$164M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IIBA$170,000
YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER$150,000
ILD$100,000
SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC$100,000
CIPC$100,000
YOUTH LAW CENTER$100,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$100,000
TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER$100,000
LIFE LEARNING ACADEMY$100,000
INTERFAITH MOVEMENT FOR HUMAN INTEGRITY$85,000
CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA INC$80,000
SAFE & SOUND$75,000
RYSE INC$75,000
COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE$75,000
CCIJ$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HUMANIDAD THERAPY & EDUCATION SERVICES: $40k → 9%COASTSIDE HOPE: $50k → 7%FIERCE ADVOCATES: $50k → 9%FIERCE ADVOCATES: $50k → 9%SECURE FAMILIES COLLABORATIVE: $50k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $45k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $45k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $42k → 9%FAMILY BUILDERS BY ADOPTION: $50k → 10%FAMILY BUILDERS BY ADOPTION: $50k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $65k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $150k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $75k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $75k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $75k → 10%VILLAGE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 10%VILLAGE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 9%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%CENTER FOR EMPOWERING REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $50k → 10%FAMILY BUILDERS BY ADOPTION: $50k → 10%BECAUSE BLACK IS STILL BEAUTIFUL: $90k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $75k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $60k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $50k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $75k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $75k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $75k → 10%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $50k → 10%CURYJ: $50k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $90k → 10%COLEMAN CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES: $111k → 10%COLEMAN CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES: $75k → 10%COLEMAN CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES: $75k → 10%COLEMAN CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES: $75k → 10%COLEMAN CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES: $52k → 10%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT: $50k → 10%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT INC: $50k → 10%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT INC: $50k → 10%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT INC: $50k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $50k → 10%AFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK: $50k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $45k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $45k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 202 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

202 repeat relationships: 124 still active in FY2024, 78 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

202
118

Total granted

$23M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+23%

Still filing today

94%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • II
    IMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $695k · revenue +45%
  • Independent Arts & Media
    5× · 2020–2024 · $662k · revenue +40%
  • YL
    YOUTH LAW CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $510k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • RU
    REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CA AT BERKELEY
    one grant, 2020 · $190k
  • TU
    TRUSTEE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF OAKLAND DBA CATHOLIC CHARITIES EAST BA
    one grant, 2021 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Arts Advocates

California Arts Advocates is a comprehensive lobbying organization for the arts, culture and creative industries and workforce.

Arts & Culture
2
Los Angeles Performance Practice

As creative producers, we are devoted to the production and presentation of groundbreaking experiences in contemporary performance that use innovative approaches to collaboration, technology, and social engagement. As a service…

Arts & Culture
3
Movimiento De Arte Y Cultura Latino Americana De San Jose Incorporated

MACLA/Movimiento de Arte y Cultura Latino Americana is an inclusive contemporary arts space grounded in the Chicano/Latino experience that incubates new visual, literary and performance art in order to engage people in civic dialogue and…

Arts & Culture
4
Occidental Center for the Arts

Occidental Center for the Arts exists to provide a welcoming and accessible venue for the performing and visual arts in Sonoma County California for local regional national and international artists. our mission is to enrich our community…

Arts & Culture
5
San Francisco Performances Inc

SFP presents internationally acclaimed and emerging performing artists, introduces innovative programs, and builds new and diversified audiences for the arts through education and outreach activities.

Arts & Culture
6
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
7
Marin Open Studios

Marin open studios is a non-profit visual arts organization dedicated to engaging and supporting marin county artists and their audiences through events, programs and services. marin open studios champions a diverse and inclusive community…

Arts & Culture
8
Bayview-Hunters Point Center for Arts and Technology Dba Baycat

BAYCAT addresses racial, gender and economic inequity by creating powerful, authentic media while diversifying the creative industry. Through the education and employment of low-income youth, young people of color, and young women in the…

Community Improvement
9
San Francisco Basque Folkloric Groups
Arts & Culture
10
On the Boards

On the Boards' mission is to invest in leading contemporary performing artists near and far and connect them to a diverse range of communities interested in forward-thinking art and ideas.

—
11
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
12
Oakland Ballet Company

Oakland Ballet Company's mission is to inspire the community by keeping the tradition of ballet exciting, vibrant and accessible.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Youth Theatre; the most unlike its peers is West Oakland Mural Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

308 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 308 of the 367 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
82
Early backer (in before they grew)
305/308
Grantees still filing
200/308
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $695,000 · Arts & CultureIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF…Independent Arts & Media: $661,500 · Arts & CultureIndependent Arts & MediaIntersection for the Arts: $618,900 · Arts & CultureIntersection for the Art…DANCERS GROUP: $367,500 · Arts & CultureDANCERS GROUPCOMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC: $265,000 · Arts & Culture+56 more: $3,113,200 · Arts & Culture+56 moreSAFE & SOUND: $410,000 · OtherCalifornia Youth Connection: $350,000 · OtherW HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE: $395,000 · OtherRYSE INC: $350,000 · OtherMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER: $385,000 · OtherMONUMENT IMPACT: $385,000 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND: $500,000 · Other+73 more: $7,703,300 · Other+73 moreYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $450,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S F…Coleman Children and Youth Services dba Coleman Advocates for Children & Youth: $388,000 · Human ServicesColeman Childre…COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ: $335,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES UNI…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $275,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARIT…Mujeres Unidas y Activas: $236,000 · Human ServicesMujeres Unidas …IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $210,000 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANT LEGAL…The Black Organizing Project Inc: $200,000 · Human ServicesThe Black Organ…Village Community Resource Center: $195,000 · Human ServicesVillage Communi…LA LUZ CENTER: $178,000 · Human ServicesFamily Builders by Adoption: $150,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOW: $125,000 · Human ServicesCOASTSIDE HOPE: $120,000 · Human Services+11 more: $705,000 · Human Services+11 moreYOUTH LAW CENTER: $510,000 · Crime & LegalYOUTH LAW …NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM: $350,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL I…CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA: $335,000 · Crime & LegalCENTRO LEG…Asian Law Caucus: $280,000 · Crime & LegalAsian Law …LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $270,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL SERV…EAST BAY CHILDRENS LAW OFFICES INC: $200,000 · Crime & LegalEAST BAY C…Oasis Legal Services: $185,000 · Crime & LegalOasis Lega…EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER: $150,000 · Crime & LegalEAST BAY C…IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE: $150,000 · Crime & LegalIMMIGRANT …Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc: $115,000 · Crime & LegalSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $590,000 · EducationLife Learning Academy: $500,000 · EducationCentro Laboral de Graton: $185,000 · EducationUC LAW SF FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $60,000 · Education+1 more: $50,000 · EducationPARTNERSHIPS FOR TRAUMA RECOVERY: $270,000 · HealthLincoln: $250,000 · HealthEast Bay Agency for Children: $250,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $168,000 · HealthBEATS RHYMES AND LIFE: $160,000 · HealthFREEDOM COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $150,000 · HealthASIAN HEALTH SERVICES: $113,000 · HealthWESTCOAST CHILDREN'S CLINIC: $95,000 · HealthContra Costa Regional Health Foundation: $80,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $270,000 · PhilanthropyEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $235,000 · PhilanthropyNorthern California Grantmakers: $212,125 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $200,000 · PhilanthropyRichmond Community Foundation: $200,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $100,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyGRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES: $60,000 · PhilanthropyZACCHO SF: $50,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $35,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$5,721,100Other$10,478,300Human Services$3,567,000Crime & Legal$2,545,000Education$1,635,000Health$1,536,000Philanthropy$1,462,125

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA: $695,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetIndependent Arts & Media: $661,500 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetIntersection for the Arts: $618,900 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $590,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH LAW CENTER: $510,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $500,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLife Learning Academy: $500,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $450,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSAFE & SOUND: $410,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetW HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE: $395,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetColeman Children and Youth Services dba Coleman Advocates for Children & Youth: $388,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER: $385,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMONUMENT IMPACT: $385,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetDANCERS GROUP: $367,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetRYSE INC: $350,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM: $350,000 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetCalifornia Youth Connection: $350,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA: $335,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ: $335,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetInterfaith Movement for Human Integrity: $285,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action: $282,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAsian Law Caucus: $280,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $280,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $275,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $270,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS FOR TRAUMA RECOVERY: $270,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $270,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC: $265,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetLincoln: $250,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEast Bay Agency for Children: $250,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMujeres Unidas y Activas: $236,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $235,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNational Center for Youth Law: $230,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEAST BAY FAMILY DEFENDERS: $225,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetNorthern California Grantmakers: $212,125 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $210,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA COLLABORATIVE FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE: $205,000 over 3y, 45% of budgetYOUTH ALIVE: $205,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Black Organizing Project Inc: $200,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetEAST BAY CHILDRENS LAW OFFICES INC: $200,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetRichmond Community Foundation: $200,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetAlliance for Girls: $200,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetVillage Community Resource Center: $195,000 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT: $191,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetOasis Legal Services: $185,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCentro Laboral de Graton: $185,000 over 4y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kenneth Rainin Founda…Walter and Elise Haas…Phyllis C Wattis Foun…Fleishhacker Foundati…East Bay Community Fo…The William & Flora H…Center for Cultural I…The San Francisco Fou…The Sam Mazza Foundat…The James Irvine Foun…Akonadi FoundationGerbode Foundation
Kenneth Rainin FoundationCA170.1× affinity92 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kenneth Rainin Foundation · Walter and Elise Haas Fund · Phyllis C Wattis Foundation · Fleishhacker Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Center for Cultural Innovation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Sam Mazza Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Akonadi Foundation · Gerbode Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Zellerbach Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Zellerbach Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    106report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Zellerbach Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Zellerbach Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 367 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zellerbach Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home