Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to serve the needs of lower income texans not afforded housing finance options through conventional lending sources.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
84
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Housing & Shelter$2.4MHuman Services$2.1MCommunity Improvement$893kFood & Nutrition$337kPublic Safety & Disaster$224kEmployment$183kHealth$148kPhilanthropy$100kCrime & Legal$70kOther$2.3M
02FY2024 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k82 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $178k
$13,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$491M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS HOMELESS NETWORK$100,000
SGI VENTURES INC$78,373
JASPER-NEWTON LONG TERM RECOVERY GROUP$40,000
FAMILY ELDERCARE$39,400
COMMUNITY OUTREACH HOUSING$35,000
CARITAS OF AUSTIN$27,400
AUSTIN TRAVIS COUNTY MHMR CENTER$27,400
EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON$25,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON$25,000
AVENUE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$25,000
YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE DBA LIFEWORKS$25,000
PANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO$25,000
PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER$25,000
AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25k → 16%PANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $35k → 20%LOAVES AND FISHES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $15k → 23%SHALOM BUILDERS OF TEXAS - CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $21k → 16%NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $71k → 19%PANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 20%AYUDA INC: $45k → 14%ANGEL REACH: $15k → 9%CORNERSTONE CDC: $20k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $19k → 16%NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $40k → 19%PANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 20%AYUDA INC: $19k → 14%GARDEN STATE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING DBA NAVICORE: $35k → 5%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15k → 16%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $43k → 16%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $23k → 20%GARDEN STATE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING DBA NAVICORE: $25k → 5%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $25k → 16%LEGACY CDC: $100k → 19%ANOTHER CHANCE HOUSE: $19k → 20%GARDEN STATE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING DBA NAVICORE: $25k → 5%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $35k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $25k → 16%LEGACY CDC: $50k → 19%PANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $19k → 20%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $21k → 16%LEGACY CDC: $19k → 19%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $21k → 11%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $19k → 16%LEGACY CDC: $15k → 19%THE WOMEN'S HOME: $18k → 16%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $19k → 11%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $21k → 21%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE DBA LIFEWORKS: $43k → 10%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $16k → 21%MARY LEE FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE DBA LIFEWORKS: $25k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE DBA LIFEWORKS: $25k → 10%YOUTH & FAMILY ALLIANCE LIFEWORKS: $21k → 10%FREE INDEED COMMUNITY WORKS CDC: $50k → 16%MARY LEE FOUNDATION: $19k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE: $39k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE: $25k → 10%FAMILY ELDERCARE: $20k → 10%LOVE NETWORK OF BAYTOWN: $43k → 16%LOVE NETWORK OF BAYTOWN: $34k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.6M · 83 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

83 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

83
25

Total granted

$7.6M
$740k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+6%

Still filing today

99%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $324k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $355k · revenue +109%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $287k · revenue +26%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC FORT BEND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $261k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • ST
    SOUTHEAST TEXAS EMERGENCY RELIEF FD
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -58%
  • EB
    Education Based Housing Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $53k · revenue +6%
  • SH
    Settagast Heights Redevelopment Corporation Northeast
    one grant, 2022 · $53k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Low-Income Housing Information Service

Our mission is to support low-income Texans efforts to achieve the American dream of a decent, affordable home in a quality neighborhood. We believe that Texas critical low-income housing and community development needs can best be solved…

Housing & Shelter
2
Houston County Habitat for Humanity Inc

Seeking to put god's love in action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
3
Affordable Homes of South Texas Inc

Affordable Homes of South Texas, Inc. is organized for the purpose of providing housing for qualified low-income families within the City of McAllen, Texas and Hidalgo County, Texas.

Housing & Shelter
4
Dallas Area Habitat for Humanity Inc

Dallas area habitat for humanity, inc. is a nondenominational christian not-for-profit organization whose purpose is to sponsor specific projects in habitat development for the dallas, texas area. modest but adequate housing, new or…

—
5
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
6
Tarrant County Homeless Coalition

Tarrant County Homeless Coalition leads the community solution to homelessness in greater Tarrant and Parker counties by serving as a catalyst for community transformation.

Human Services
7
Hearts for Homes

The mission of Hearts for Homes is to improve the living conditions of low-income senior homeowners in Denton County. Hearts for Homes is a nonprofit Christian outreach providing hope and dignity through home rehabilitation, affording…

Human Services
8
HomeAid Austin Inc

Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.

Employment
9
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
10
LifeHouse of Houston Inc

LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.

—
11
Habitat for Humanity of Central Arkansas Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
12
Habitat for Humanity Texas Inc

Habitat offices across texas rely on habitat for humanity texas to strenghten efforts to address the affordable housing crisis that face communities across the state. habitat texas does this by empowering and equiping these offices through…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Center for the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Settagast Heights Redevelopment Corporation Northeast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Prevention & Fo…Food Assistance & Emergency…Early Childhood and K-12 Ed…Charter and Independent Sch…Family Philanthropic Founda…Christian Missionary Organi…Professional Association Ne…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%4%<5yr17%5%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr9%35%35–55yr11%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr17%3%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr9%47%35–55yr11%11%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/127
the rest of the field
16%
13,191/80,042

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
116/118
Grantees still filing
68/118
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

New Hope Housing Inc — $173,352 · Housing & ShelterNew Hope Housing IncAvenue Community Development Corporation — $171,383 · Housing & ShelterAvenue Community Development C…Habitat for Humanity of Smith County — $155,350 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity of Smith …FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $149,319 · Housing & ShelterFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INCFORT WORTH AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $148,383 · Housing & ShelterFORT WORTH AREA HABITAT FOR HU…GALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $135,350 · Housing & ShelterGALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT …TARRANT COUNTY SAMARITAN HOUSING INC — $125,319 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIN COUNTY — $121,850 · Housing & ShelterFort Cavazos Community Habitat for Humanity Inc — $114,500 · Housing & ShelterHouston Habitat for Humanity Inc — $105,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC — $105,000 · Housing & ShelterMONTGOMERY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $79,500 · Housing & Shelter+24 more — $786,100 · Housing & Shelter+24 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC FORT BEND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $260,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONA…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY-CORPUS CHRISTI INC — $180,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY-CORPUS CHRIS…AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $153,352 · OtherAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION — $153,319 · OtherVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDA…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS INC — $140,319 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSO…Bethany House of Laredo Inc — $109,000 · OtherCARITAS OF AUSTIN — $105,400 · OtherProject Transitions Inc — $99,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EL PASO INC — $93,500 · OtherSOUTHEAST TEXAS EMERGENCY RELIEF FD — $100,000 · Other+33 more — $1,191,425 · Other+33 moreTENDER LOVING CARE CENTER FOR CHILDREN DBA LEGACY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC — $209,500 · Human ServicesTENDER LOVING CARE CENTER F…YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE — $153,850 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCETHE WOMEN'S HOME — $153,317 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S HOMEPANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $128,850 · Human ServicesPANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICE…BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $119,350 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY S…6 STONES MISSION NETWORK — $115,000 · Human Services6 STONES MISSION NETWORKNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS — $110,500 · Human ServicesSewa International Inc — $91,000 · Human ServicesGARDEN STATE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING INC — $85,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY ELDERCARE INC — $84,400 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesLove Network of Baytown — $76,500 · Human Services+19 more — $683,383 · Human Services+19 moreENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $354,500 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE …HOMELESS NETWORK OF TEXAS — $165,000 · Community ImprovementHOMELESS NE…FIFTH WARD COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $113,000 · Community ImprovementFIFTH WARD …REBUILDING TOGETHER-EL PASO INC — $108,850 · Community ImprovementREBUILDING …CITIZENS FOR PROGRESS INC — $53,000 · Community ImprovementCITIZENS FO…EL PASO COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM PROJECT BRAVO INC — $38,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $61,000 · Community Improvement+3 moreMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC — $287,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY — $50,000 · Food & NutritionJASPER-NEWTON LONG TERM RECOVERY GROUP — $90,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC — $63,500 · Public Safety & DisasterVICTORIA COUNTY LONG-TERM RECOVERY GROUP — $60,000 · Public Safety & DisasterThe Restoration Team — $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING — $152,850 · EmploymentCAREER & RECOVERY RESOURCES INC — $30,000 · Employment
Housing & Shelter$2,370,406Other$2,586,315Human Services$2,090,650Community Improvement$893,350Food & Nutrition$337,000Public Safety & Disaster$223,500Employment$182,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $354,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC — $287,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC FORT BEND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $260,500 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetTENDER LOVING CARE CENTER FOR CHILDREN DBA LEGACY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC — $209,500 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY-CORPUS CHRISTI INC — $180,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetNew Hope Housing Inc — $173,352 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetAvenue Community Development Corporation — $171,383 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHOMELESS NETWORK OF TEXAS — $165,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Smith County — $155,350 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE — $153,850 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $153,352 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION — $153,319 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S HOME — $153,317 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING — $152,850 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $149,319 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFORT WORTH AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $148,383 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY TEXAS INC — $140,319 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetGALILEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $135,350 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetPANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $128,850 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY SAMARITAN HOUSING INC — $125,319 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIN COUNTY — $121,850 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $119,350 over 7y, 0.1% of budget6 STONES MISSION NETWORK — $115,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFort Cavazos Community Habitat for Humanity Inc — $114,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetFIFTH WARD COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $113,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS — $110,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBethany House of Laredo Inc — $109,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER-EL PASO INC — $108,850 over 5y, 11% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN — $105,400 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHouston Habitat for Humanity Inc — $105,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC — $105,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHEAST TEXAS EMERGENCY RELIEF FD — $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetProject Transitions Inc — $99,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EL PASO INC — $93,500 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetSewa International Inc — $91,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetJASPER-NEWTON LONG TERM RECOVERY GROUP — $90,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetGARDEN STATE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING INC — $85,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBlackland Community Development Inc — $84,883 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetFAMILY ELDERCARE INC — $84,400 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC — $80,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $79,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMERCED HOUSING TEXAS — $79,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLove Network of Baytown — $76,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetAGAPE RESOURCE & ASSISTANCE CENTER INC — $75,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO — $69,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetGOLDEN CRESCENT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $68,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMARY LEE FOUNDATION — $66,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

BBVA FoundationEnterprise Community …United Way of Greater…Habitat for Humanity …Centerpoint Energy Fo…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Austin Community Foun…St David's FoundationThe Moody FoundationIsla Carroll Turner F…Greater Houston Commu…Texas Mutual Insuranc…
BBVA FoundationAL45.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: BBVA Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · United Way of Greater Houston · Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Isla Carroll Turner Friendship Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Texas Mutual Insurance Company

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Garden State Consumer Credit Counseling Inc — 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines