Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Texas Mutual Insurance Company

Established by Texas statute to provide a stable, competitive source of workers' compensation insurance for Texas employers, acts as an insurer of last resort, and help to prevent on-the-job injuries and illnesses and minimize their consequences.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
168
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Employment$19MPublic Safety & Disaster$15MEducation$8.6MHuman Services$5.4MPhilanthropy$4.6MHealth$2.6MPublic Benefit$1.7MHousing & Shelter$1.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 168 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 168 grants below total $14,584,333 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $17,105,929 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,521,596 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k38 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k124 grants · $11M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.5M
$87,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Texas 2036$600,000
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS$500,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER HOUSTON$450,000
TEXSAR INC$375,000
STATE FIREMENS AND FIRE MARSHALS ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS$300,000
UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN$250,000
WORKSOURCE GREATER AUSTIN AREA WORKFORCE BOARD$220,000
DALLAS FOUNDATION A TX NONPROFIT CORPORATION$200,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT TYLER$150,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON$150,000
TORCH FOUNDATION$142,000
AVANCE INC$125,000
ASSET FUNDERS NETWORK$125,000
Aspen Institute$101,333
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE JIM H GREEN KIDZ HARBOR INC: $95k → 10%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $100k → 16%PANHANDLE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100k → 20%CLAYTON CHILD CARE INC: $88k → 11%WILLIAMSON BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES: $50k → 6%Buckner Children & Family Services Inc: $50k → 14%THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth Inc: $100k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC: $100k → 14%Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth Inc: $85k → 11%Jewish Family Service of Dallas Inc: $100k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH INC: $80k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $100k → 14%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $100k → 17%APM OUTREACH INC DBA ANCHOR POINT: $50k → 14%EARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC: $100k → 17%FAMILY SERVICE OF EL PASO: $50k → 21%TARRANT COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 11%TEXAS NEW COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $60k → 9%TARRANT COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 11%CITYSQUARE: $100k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE INC: $100k → 14%The Family Place: $75k → 14%ALLIANCE OF COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC: $90k → 16%ALLIANCE OF COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $75k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $65k → 16%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $100k → 17%FAMILY PATHFINDERS OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $75k → 11%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $100k → 17%Mission of Mercy Inc: $60k → 17%LATCHED SUPPORT INC: $100k → 16%SAN ANTONIO LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $60k → 16%FOR OAK CLIFF: $100k → 14%SHARING LIFE COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $100k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 14%WONDERS & WORRIES INC: $60k → 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC DBA UPBRING: $90k → 10%CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $75k → 16%BAKERRIPLEY: $75k → 16%Chinese Community Center Inc: $75k → 16%MEMORIAL ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $100k → 16%MEMORIAL ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $100k → 16%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $75k → 16%The Sanctuary Foster Care Services: $75k → 16%MY CONNECT COMMUNITY: $100k → 16%MY CONNECT COMMUNITY: $88k → 16%Bay Area Turning Point Inc: $75k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$38M · 270 repeat orgs$22M to everyone else

270 repeat relationships — 96 still active in FY2024, 174 since wound down; 62 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

270
1229

Total granted

$38M
$18M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+20%

Still filing today

48%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthEmploymentPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • United Way of Greater Houston
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +10%
  • TS
    The State Firemens and Fire Marshals Association of Texas
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +25%
  • TI
    TEXSAR INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +153% · 65% of their budget

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2020 · $150k
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +18%
  • IC
    I CARE SAN ANTONIO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
2
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

3
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
4
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
5
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
6
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
7
Atascosa Health Center Inc

Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.

Health
8
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
9
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
10
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
11
Breakthrough Houston

The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.

Education
12
Texas Alliance for Patient Access

Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Texas 4C Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rob & Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyProfessional Trade Associat…Supportive Housing for Vuln…Regional Chambers of Commer…Firefighter Support Organiz…Texas Environmental Conserv…Family Foundations & Grantm…Early Childhood and Element…Professional Trade Associat…Child Welfare & Family Serv…Labor Unions and Benefit Tr…High School Activity Booste…Member Golf ClubsResidential Community Assoc…Indian Cultural & Religious…Healthcare System Support O…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%2%<5yr17%7%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr9%33%35–55yr11%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%1%<5yr17%11%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr9%28%35–55yr11%25%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.1% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.1%1/1,573
the rest of the field
17%
12,482/73,159

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

445 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 445 of the 1,571 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
69
Early backer (in before they grew)
439/445
Grantees still filing
273/445
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The State Firemens and Fire Marshals Association of Texas — $1,100,000 · OtherThe State Firemens and Fire Marshals Association o…LAMAR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $700,000 · OtherTEXSAR INC — $1,018,418 · Other+82 more — $16,836,929 · Other+82 moreCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $1,587,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUND…United Way of Greater Houston — $1,100,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Gre…THE DALLAS FOUNDATION — $875,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDA…UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN — $697,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY FOR GR…DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · PhilanthropyDEL MAR COLLEGE F…UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $500,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MET…UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $425,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SAN…EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $362,500 · Philanthropy+7 more — $885,000 · Philanthropy+7 moreCapital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc — $337,500 · Human ServicesCapital Invest…MISSION OF MERCY INC — $310,000 · Human ServicesMISSION OF MER…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $300,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY …BakerRipley — $281,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH — $265,000 · Human ServicesBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $260,000 · Human ServicesMemorial Assistance Ministries — $200,000 · Human ServicesEARLY LEARNING CENTERS OF LUBBOCK INC — $199,880 · Human ServicesMy Connect Community — $188,000 · Human Services+29 more — $3,169,500 · Human Services+29 moreTHE TSTC FOUNDATION — $475,000 · EducationTHE TSTC F…WILKINSON CENTER — $385,000 · EducationWILKINSON …RESTORE EDUCATION INC — $375,000 · EducationRESTORE ED…CITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC — $340,000 · EducationCITIZENS F…Todos Juntos Learning Center — $227,500 · EducationTodos Junt…TEXAS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $210,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE MAINLAND FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Education+22 more — $2,033,701 · Education+22 moreMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $530,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $450,000 · HealthSANTA MARIA HOSTEL INC — $350,000 · HealthCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA — $250,000 · HealthCANCER CARE SERVICES — $162,500 · HealthEASTER SEALS NORTH TEXAS — $150,000 · HealthPaso del Norte Community Foundation — $140,000 · HealthThe Georgetown Project — $105,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC — $100,000 · HealthTHE SETTLEMENT CLUB — $100,000 · HealthEASTER SEALS - CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $100,000 · HealthCITIZENS EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE INC — $100,000 · HealthPASO DEL NORTE CHILDREN'S DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $100,000 · Health+4 more — $295,500 · HealthWORKSOURCE - GREATER AUSTIN AREA DBA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS - CAPITAL — $505,000 · EmploymentSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INC — $400,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $285,000 · EmploymentSkillpoint Alliance — $250,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LUBBOCK INC — $200,000 · EmploymentHOUSTON'S CAPITAL INVESTING IN DEVELOP- MENT AND EMPLOYMENT OF ADULTS INC — $200,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF EAST TEXAS INC — $180,000 · EmploymentALAMO WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT INC — $175,000 · EmploymentUniversal Tech Movement — $100,000 · EmploymentHOME BUILDERS INSTITUTE — $85,000 · Employment+1 more — $70,000 · EmploymentTexas 2036 — $1,700,000 · Public BenefitNextOp Inc — $275,000 · Public BenefitGood Work Austin — $90,000 · Public BenefitConstruction Career Collaborative — $80,000 · Public BenefitPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $75,000 · Public Benefit
Other$19,655,347Philanthropy$6,932,500Human Services$5,510,880Education$4,246,201Health$2,933,000Employment$2,450,000Public Benefit$2,220,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTexas 2036 — $1,700,000 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $1,587,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston — $1,100,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetThe State Firemens and Fire Marshals Association of Texas — $1,100,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetTEXSAR INC — $1,018,418 over 3y, 65% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION — $875,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN — $697,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $530,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetWORKSOURCE - GREATER AUSTIN AREA DBA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS - CAPITAL — $505,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCHILD CARE ASSOCIATES — $500,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $500,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION — $475,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $450,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $450,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $425,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INC — $400,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc — $392,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWILKINSON CENTER — $385,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetRESTORE EDUCATION INC — $375,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetEL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $362,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $358,000 over 4y, 42% of budgetSANTA MARIA HOSTEL INC — $350,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC — $340,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetCapital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc — $337,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetAVANCE INC — $335,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTORCH FOUNDATION — $333,056 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetVALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT — $316,667 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC — $310,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $304,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ONESTAR FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $300,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLONE STAR JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $300,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $285,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBakerRipley — $281,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNextOp Inc — $275,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH — $265,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM — $260,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetBUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $260,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER WACO COLLECTIVE IMPACT INITIATIVE — $259,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA — $250,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetSkillpoint Alliance — $250,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC — $232,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTodos Juntos Learning Center — $227,500 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetLIFTFUND INC — $225,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCODE2COLLEGE — $210,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetTEXAS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $210,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas 2036
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Houston
  • Who funds The State Firemens and Fire Marshals Association of Texas
  • Who funds TEXSAR INC
  • Who funds THE DALLAS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED WAY FOR GREATER AUSTIN
  • Who funds MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS
  • Who funds WORKSOURCE - GREATER AUSTIN AREA DBA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS - CAPITAL
  • Who funds DELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILD CARE ASSOCIATES
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC
  • Who funds THE TSTC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY
  • Who funds SER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INC
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc
  • Who funds WILKINSON CENTER
  • Who funds RESTORE EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SANTA MARIA HOSTEL INC
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC
  • Who funds Capital Investing in Development and Employment of Adults Inc
  • Who funds AVANCE INC
  • Who funds TORCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VALLEY INITIATIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADVANCEMENT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Moody FoundationTX57.4× affinity85 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Moody Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · St David's Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Episcopal Health Foundation · Trellis Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · The Methodist Hospital · United Way of Greater Houston · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Isla Carroll Turner Friendship Trust · Strake Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas Mutual Insurance Company funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Year Up Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
84report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1571 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph