Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
87
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0166% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$4.2MHealth$3.4MEducation$1.4MArts & Culture$1.3MCommunity Improvement$1.1MYouth Development$628kPhilanthropy$598kReligion$268kHousing & Shelter$251kOther$7.7M
02FY2024 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.0M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GWEN'S GIRLS$200,000
HEALTHY START INC$166,484
METRO COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC$150,000
YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY$138,000
BEAVER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$125,000
NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES$125,000
JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES$119,405
DISABILITY LEAD$100,000
NEW SUN RISING$100,000
YOUNG BLACK MOTIVATED KINGS AND QUEENS$100,000
FIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC$98,600
ADELPHOI$95,000
1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY$75,000
CHABAD HOUSE ON CAMPUS INC$75,000
HOSANNA HOUSE INC$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CRISIS SHELTER OF LAWRENCE COUNTY: $67k → 13%FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $50k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $138k → 12%MHY FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 9%CASA SAN JOSE: $25k → 11%CRISIS CENTER OF LAWRENCE COUNTY: $46k → 13%NURTUREPA INC: $70k → 12%FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY: $25k → 13%HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $25k → 13%TRANSITIONAL PATHS TO INDEPENDENT LIVING: $50k → 12%HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $25k → 13%CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC: $25k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $119k → 11%HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $25k → 13%GLADE RUN FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%AWAKEN PITTSBURGH: $115k → 11%CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC: $25k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $100k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $41k → 11%ALPHA HOUSE INC: $75k → 11%AWAKEN PITTSBURGH: $38k → 11%AWAKEN PITTSBURGH: $35k → 11%FAMILYLINKS: $33k → 11%AWAKEN PITTSBURGH: $27k → 11%WATSON INSTITUTE: $35k → 11%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $150k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $65k → 11%REIMAGINE REENTRY INC: $58k → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $30k → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $30k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $100k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $100k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $65k → 11%CHARTIERS CENTER: $100k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $30k → 11%CHARTIERS CENTER: $42k → 11%CHARTIERS CENTER: $31k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $250k → 11%OUTREACH TEEN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $160k → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $50k → 11%OUTREACH TEEN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $39k → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $50k → 11%REIMAGINE REENTRY INC: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES: $100k → 11%LOCALLY GROWN: $83k → 11%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
TN
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 119 repeat orgs$8.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

119 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

119
229

Total granted

$12M
$7.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+26%

Still filing today

83%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NEW SUN RISING
    6× · 2018–2024 · $431k · revenue +163%
  • NK
    NAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA
    6× · 2018–2023 · $317k · revenue +114%
  • HS
    HEALTHY START INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $307k · revenue +202%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FRED ROGERS COMPANY
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +5%
  • PC
    Primary Care Health Services Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -3%
  • FI
    FAMILYLINKS INC - GRANTS
    one grant, 2017 · $249k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jeremiah's Place Pittsburgh Relief Nursery

Jeremiah's place will protect children and strengthen families by providing a safe haven of respite, health, renewal, and support for children and families during times of crisis. we strive to serve as a leading voice for child abuse…

Human Services
2
Community Action Commission

Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services
3
Center for Victims

Center for victims offers a public service in allegheny county by helping individuals, families, and communities heal from the trauma of sexual assault/abuse, intimate partner violence, community violence, and all forms of violence and…

Human Services
4
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
5
Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute

Ppi is operated solely by penn state health and is dedicated to providing exceptional clinical care, advancing diverse educational opportunities for the next generation of behavioral health specialists, fostering impactful research, and…

Health
6
Pathways Pa Inc

To provide residential and community-based services and advocacy for women, children, and families, providing job training and employment assistance, as well as outreach and residential programs in order to help its clients achieve…

Human Services
7
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
8
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
9
Community Counseling Center of Mercer County

To help individuals and families lead healthy and fulfilling lives.

Health
10
Pittsburgh Community Services Inc

Provide programs to help individuals and/or families achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
11
Pa Treatment & Healing

The mission of pa treatment & healing is to guide people on a path to change through quality counseling, treatment and education. this is accomplished by providing a comprehensive individual and family centered, values oriented treatment…

Community Improvement
12
Pmhcc Inc

The mission of pmhcc is to improve service and recovery opportunities for persons who are challenged by serious and/or prolonged mental illness, drug and alcohol abuse and/or other barriers to self-sufficiency, in support of those citizens…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Onala Recovery Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is When She Thrives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts Education Ce…Pittsburgh Community Develo…Community Health CentersPoverty Relief & Family Sup…Early Childhood Education S…Public Library SystemsPittsburgh Regional Institu…Environmental Conservation …Disability, Disease, and Re…Cancer Care & Support Organ…Family Charitable Foundatio…Faith-Based K-12 SchoolsYouth Support and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%2%<5yr13%13%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr19%23%20–35yr16%25%35–55yr17%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%1%<5yr13%14%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr16%33%35–55yr17%13%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%3/267
the rest of the field
7%
1,063/14,242

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

255 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 255 of the 386 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
74
Early backer (in before they grew)
248/255
Grantees still filing
188/255
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEALTHY START INC — $306,884 · OtherADELPHOI — $270,000 · OtherFAMILYLINKS INC - GRANTS — $249,000 · Other+93 more — $6,621,654 · Other+93 moreNEW SUN RISING — $431,250 · Human ServicesNEW SUN RISINGWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $256,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHEL…Awaken Pittsburgh — $249,955 · Human ServicesAwaken PittsburghOutreach Teen and Family Services Inc — $247,635 · Human ServicesOutreach Teen and Famil…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $245,105 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILD…WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES — $205,000 · Human ServicesWESLEY FAMILY SERVICESCHARTIERS CENTER — $181,200 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT — $151,000 · Human ServicesCENTER OF LIFE — $141,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY — $138,000 · Human Services+23 more — $1,524,148 · Human Services+23 moreNAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA — $317,267 · HealthNAMI KEYSTONE PENN…Primary Care Health Services Inc — $250,000 · HealthPrimary Care Healt…SQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER — $205,000 · HealthSQUIRREL HILL HEAL…ADAGIO HEALTH INC — $201,000 · HealthADAGIO HEALTH INCST MARGARET FOUNDATION — $200,000 · HealthST MARGARET FOUNDA…ALLIES FOR HEALTH WELLBEING — $181,000 · HealthALLIES FOR HEALTH …COMMUNITY GUIDANCE CENTER — $133,100 · HealthFIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC — $121,448 · HealthMETRO FAMILY PRACTICE INC — $104,000 · HealthUNITY RECOVERY — $100,000 · Health+26 more — $1,176,687 · Health+26 morePITTSBURGH AREA COMMUNITY SCHOOLS — $299,594 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $256,500 · EducationYoung Black Motivated Kings & Queen — $125,500 · EducationPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationDISABILITY LEAD — $100,000 · EducationTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC — $95,000 · EducationWAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY — $75,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationEducation Law Center - PA — $45,000 · Education+4 more — $120,500 · EducationTHE FRED ROGERS COMPANY — $300,000 · Arts & Culture1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC — $221,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLICSOURCE — $203,000 · Arts & CultureBHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH — $85,000 · Arts & CultureNEW HAZLETT CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $65,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER PITTSBURGH ARTS COUNCIL — $64,700 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA — $50,025 · Arts & CultureFine Art Miracles Inc — $50,000 · Arts & CultureATTACK THEATRE INC — $48,810 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $116,500 · Arts & CultureNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC — $752,600 · Community ImprovementHUGH LANE WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC — $132,000 · Community ImprovementFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION — $80,500 · Community ImprovementCENTER IN MIDLAND PA — $70,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT — $65,000 · Community ImprovementGwens Girls Inc — $279,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DRAGON'S DEN — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBrookline Teen Outreach — $75,200 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $53,945 · Youth DevelopmentALLEGHENY YOUTH DEVELOPMENT — $40,000 · Youth Development
Other$7,447,538Human Services$3,770,293Health$2,989,502Education$1,267,094Arts & Culture$1,204,035Community Improvement$1,100,100Youth Development$548,645

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC — $752,600 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetNEW SUN RISING — $431,250 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetNAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA — $317,267 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetHEALTHY START INC — $306,884 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTHE FRED ROGERS COMPANY — $300,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH AREA COMMUNITY SCHOOLS — $299,594 over 4y, 12% of budgetGwens Girls Inc — $279,500 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $256,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $256,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPrimary Care Health Services Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAwaken Pittsburgh — $249,955 over 5y, 29% of budgetOutreach Teen and Family Services Inc — $247,635 over 4y, 39% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $245,105 over 4y, 1.0% of budget1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC — $221,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetSQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER — $205,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWESLEY FAMILY SERVICES — $205,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetPUBLICSOURCE — $203,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetADAGIO HEALTH INC — $201,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetPITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATION — $185,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetCHARTIERS CENTER — $181,200 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetALLIES FOR HEALTH WELLBEING — $181,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetPERSAD CENTER INC — $177,665 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT — $151,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOSANNA HOUSE INC — $150,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMELTING POT MINISTRIES — $150,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetMental Health America of Southwestern PA — $148,600 over 8y, 12% of budgetCENTER OF LIFE — $141,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetYOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY — $138,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetNICOLINAS WISHES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $137,000 over 3y, 55% of budgetCOMMUNITY GUIDANCE CENTER — $133,100 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHUGH LANE WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC — $132,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetYoung Black Motivated Kings & Queen — $125,500 over 2y, 21% of budgetFIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC — $121,448 over 2y, 12% of budgetHUMAN SERVICES CENTER — $119,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORPORATION — $114,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetARISE LAWRENCE COUNTY — $112,702 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetREIMAGINE REENTRY INC — $107,800 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetSOJOURNER HOUSE MOMS — $106,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetMETRO FAMILY PRACTICE INC — $104,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNITY RECOVERY — $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetALPHA HOUSE — $100,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetTHE DRAGON'S DEN — $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetDISABILITY LEAD — $100,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetSHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $97,084 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSTO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $95,050 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family Founda…The Pittsburgh Founda…The Grable FoundationThe Heinz EndowmentsRichard King Mellon F…The United Way of Sou…Opportunity FoundationFisa FoundationEden Hall FoundationThe Buhl FoundationThe Jack Buncher Foun…Upmc Group
Hillman Family FoundationsPA163.8× affinity117 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Opportunity Foundation · Fisa Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Upmc Group

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    78report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 386 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines