· Private foundation
The Grable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k34 grants · $215k
- $10k–50k263 grants · $5.4M
- $50k–250k55 grants · $4.3M
- $250k+9 grants · $3.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALLEGHENY INTERMEDIATE UNIT | $1,000,000 |
| THE MENTORING PARTNERSHIP OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA | $410,160 |
| ALLEGHENY INTERMEDIATE UNIT | $350,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH | $350,000 |
| CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH | $300,000 |
| CARNEGIE MUSEUMS OF PITTSBURGH | $300,000 |
| SLB RADIO PRODUCTIONS INC | $260,000 |
| PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| ALLEGHENY INTERMEDIATE UNIT | $200,000 |
| SLB RADIO PRODUCTIONS INC | $181,901 |
| KNOWLEDGEWORKS FOUNDATION | $168,436 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD NORTH MUSEUM OF PLAY | $150,000 |
| TRYING TOGETHER | $145,000 |
| NEW SUN RISING | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
304 repeat relationships — 231 still active in FY2024, 73 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $932k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GOGRANTMAKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA4× · 2020–2023 · $4.5M · revenue +163% · 71% of their budget
- CICARNEGIE INSTITUTE5× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +41%
- CMCarnegie Mellon University5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +35%
Funded once
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $600k · revenue +6%
- WPWESTERN PA LEARNING 2025 ALLIANCEone grant, 2021 · $497k
- ARALLEGHENY RIVERTRAIL PARK (SEE ASPINWALL RIVERFRONT PARK INC)one grant, 2023 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.
Provide information to decision maker in the pittsburgh region to promote economic prosperity, social equity, and environmental quality for sustainable solutions for communities and businesses.
Vibrant pittsburgh's mission is to accelerate the business community toward equitable, inclusive, and diverse workplaces, creating a future-forward region.
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…
The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…
The corporation advances excellence in the arts, including studio, media, and creative writing. to achieve its mission, the corporation provides equipment and facilities for individual artists, conducts educational programs, and stimulates…
To protect, preserve, and promote the scenic resources of southwestern pennsylvania.
Membership organization formed to help tech companies succeed through a proven platform of business development, talent retention, government relations, and visibility services. companies at all growth stages use the pittsburgh technology…
See schedule othe allegheny conference on community development (accd) and affiliates - the greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (chamber), the pennsylvania economy league of greater pittsburgh(pelgp) and the pittsburgh regional alliance…
Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the
Charter school providing education to students from sixth through twelfth grade.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pittsburgh Urban Magnet Project and the most unlike its peers is Christophers Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
355 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 355 of the 452 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRANTMAKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST ↗
- Who funds TRYING TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds THE MENTORING PARTNERSHIP OF SW PA ↗
- Who funds THE FRED ROGERS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds SLB RADIO PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds A SCHOOLS PITTSBURGH'S COMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Consortium for Public Education ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ATTACK THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMON SENSE MEDIA ↗
- Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds STUDENT U ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW SUN RISING ↗
- Who funds ALLEGHENY PARTNERS FOR OUT-OF- SCHOOL TIME APOST INC ↗
- Who funds STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER CRAFTSMEN'S GUILD ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds WQED MULTIMEDIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Heinz Endowments · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · McElhattan Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na · Opportunity Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Grable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Classroom Champions Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Grable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Grable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.