Skip to content
Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
87
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.6MHuman Services$4.0MCommunity Improvement$1.9MEducation$1.7MYouth Development$1.5MArts & Culture$1.2MHousing & Shelter$644kPhilanthropy$628kOther$0
02FY2024 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.0M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$68M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GWEN'S GIRLS$200,000
HEALTHY START INC$166,484
METRO COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC$150,000
YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY$138,000
NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES$125,000
BEAVER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$125,000
JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES$119,405
YOUNG BLACK MOTIVATED KINGS AND QUEENS$100,000
DISABILITY LEAD$100,000
NEW SUN RISING$100,000
FIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC$98,600
ADELPHOI$95,000
HOSANNA HOUSE INC$75,000
CHABAD HOUSE ON CAMPUS INC$75,000
1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CRISIS SHELTER OF LAWRENCE COUNTY: $67k → 13%FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $50k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $138k → 12%MHY FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 9%CASA SAN JOSE: $25k → 11%FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY: $25k → 13%CRISIS CENTER OF LAWRENCE COUNTY: $46k → 13%NURTUREPA INC: $70k → 12%HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $25k → 13%CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC: $25k → 17%TRANSITIONAL PATHS TO INDEPENDENT LIVING: $50k → 12%HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $25k → 13%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $119k → 11%HUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $25k → 13%CITY MISSION - LIVING STONES INC: $25k → 17%GLADE RUN FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%AWAKEN PITTSBURGH: $115k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $100k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $41k → 11%ALPHA HOUSE INC: $75k → 11%AWAKEN PITTSBURGH: $38k → 11%AWAKEN PITTSBURGH: $35k → 11%FAMILYLINKS: $33k → 11%AWAKEN PITTSBURGH: $27k → 11%WATSON INSTITUTE: $35k → 11%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $150k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $65k → 11%REIMAGINE REENTRY INC: $58k → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $30k → 11%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $30k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $100k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $100k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $65k → 11%CHARTIERS CENTER: $100k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $30k → 11%CHARTIERS CENTER: $42k → 11%CHARTIERS CENTER: $31k → 11%WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $250k → 11%OUTREACH TEEN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $160k → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $50k → 11%OUTREACH TEEN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $39k → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $50k → 11%REIMAGINE REENTRY INC: $50k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES: $100k → 11%LOCALLY GROWN: $83k → 11%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
TN
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 119 repeat orgs$8.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

119 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

119
229

Total granted

$12M
$7.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+27%

Still filing today

83%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NEW SUN RISING
    6× · 2018–2024 · $431k · revenue +163%
  • NK
    NAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA
    6× · 2018–2023 · $317k · revenue +114%
  • HS
    HEALTHY START INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $307k · revenue +298%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FRED ROGERS COMPANY
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +5%
  • PC
    Primary Care Health Services Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -3%
  • FI
    FAMILYLINKS INC - GRANTS
    one grant, 2017 · $249k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jeremiah's Place Pittsburgh Relief Nursery

Jeremiah's place will protect children and strengthen families by providing a safe haven of respite, health, renewal, and support for children and families during times of crisis. we strive to serve as a leading voice for child abuse…

Human Services
2
Community Action Commission

Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services
3
Center for Victims

Center for victims offers a public service in allegheny county by helping individuals, families, and communities heal from the trauma of sexual assault/abuse, intimate partner violence, community violence, and all forms of violence and…

Human Services
4
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
5
Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute

Ppi is operated solely by penn state health and is dedicated to providing exceptional clinical care, advancing diverse educational opportunities for the next generation of behavioral health specialists, fostering impactful research, and…

Health
6
Pathways Pa Inc

To provide residential and community-based services and advocacy for women, children, and families, providing job training and employment assistance, as well as outreach and residential programs in order to help its clients achieve…

Human Services
7
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
8
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
9
Community Counseling Center of Mercer County

To help individuals and families lead healthy and fulfilling lives.

Health
10
Pittsburgh Community Services Inc

Provide programs to help individuals and/or families achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
11
Pa Treatment & Healing

The mission of pa treatment & healing is to guide people on a path to change through quality counseling, treatment and education. this is accomplished by providing a comprehensive individual and family centered, values oriented treatment…

Community Improvement
12
Pmhcc Inc

The mission of pmhcc is to improve service and recovery opportunities for persons who are challenged by serious and/or prolonged mental illness, drug and alcohol abuse and/or other barriers to self-sufficiency, in support of those citizens…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Onala Recovery Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is When She Thrives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

255 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 255 of the 386 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
74
Early backer (in before they grew)
248/255
Grantees still filing
186/255
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTHY START INC: $306,884 · OtherADELPHOI: $270,000 · OtherFAMILYLINKS INC - GRANTS: $249,000 · OtherGwens Girls Inc: $279,500 · Other+88 more: $6,270,699 · Other+88 moreNEW SUN RISING: $431,250 · Human ServicesNEW SUN RISINGWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $256,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHEL…Awaken Pittsburgh: $249,955 · Human ServicesAwaken PittsburghOutreach Teen and Family Services Inc: $247,635 · Human ServicesOutreach Teen and Famil…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $245,105 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILD…WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $205,000 · Human ServicesWESLEY FAMILY SERVICESCHARTIERS CENTER: $181,200 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT: $151,000 · Human ServicesCENTER OF LIFE: $141,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $138,000 · Human Services+23 more: $1,524,148 · Human Services+23 moreNAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA: $317,267 · HealthNAMI KEYSTONE PENN…Primary Care Health Services Inc: $250,000 · HealthPrimary Care Healt…SQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER: $205,000 · HealthSQUIRREL HILL HEAL…ADAGIO HEALTH INC: $201,000 · HealthADAGIO HEALTH INCST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthST MARGARET FOUNDA…ALLIES FOR HEALTH WELLBEING: $181,000 · HealthALLIES FOR HEALTH …COMMUNITY GUIDANCE CENTER: $133,100 · HealthFIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC: $121,448 · HealthMETRO FAMILY PRACTICE INC: $104,000 · Health+30 more: $1,351,687 · Health+30 morePITTSBURGH AREA COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $299,594 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $256,500 · EducationYoung Black Motivated Kings & Queen: $125,500 · EducationDISABILITY LEAD: $100,000 · EducationPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationTHE PITTSBURGH CONTINGENCY INC: $95,000 · EducationWAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationEducation Law Center - PA: $45,000 · Education+2 more: $70,500 · EducationTHE FRED ROGERS COMPANY: $300,000 · Arts & Culture1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC: $221,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLICSOURCE: $203,000 · Arts & CultureBHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH: $85,000 · Arts & CultureNEW HAZLETT CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $65,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER PITTSBURGH ARTS COUNCIL: $64,700 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA: $50,025 · Arts & CultureFine Art Miracles Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureATTACK THEATRE INC: $48,810 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $116,500 · Arts & CultureNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC: $752,600 · Community ImprovementHUGH LANE WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $132,000 · Community ImprovementFOCUS ON RENEWAL STO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION: $80,500 · Community ImprovementCENTER IN MIDLAND PA: $70,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT: $65,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $25,000 · Community ImprovementPITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATION: $185,000 · PhilanthropyMELTING POT MINISTRIES: $150,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $75,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $70,100 · PhilanthropyGRANTMAKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $35,000 · PhilanthropyPOISE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JOHNSTOWN: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$7,376,083Human Services$3,770,293Health$3,064,502Education$1,217,094Arts & Culture$1,204,035Community Improvement$1,125,100Philanthropy$570,100

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC: $752,600 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetNEW SUN RISING: $431,250 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetNAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA: $317,267 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetHEALTHY START INC: $306,884 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTHE FRED ROGERS COMPANY: $300,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH AREA COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $299,594 over 4y, 12% of budgetGwens Girls Inc: $279,500 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $256,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER AND SHELTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $256,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPrimary Care Health Services Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAwaken Pittsburgh: $249,955 over 5y, 29% of budgetOutreach Teen and Family Services Inc: $247,635 over 4y, 39% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $245,105 over 4y, 1.0% of budget1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC: $221,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetWESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $205,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetSQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER: $205,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPUBLICSOURCE: $203,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetADAGIO HEALTH INC: $201,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetPITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATION: $185,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetCHARTIERS CENTER: $181,200 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetALLIES FOR HEALTH WELLBEING: $181,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetPERSAD CENTER INC: $177,665 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT: $151,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMELTING POT MINISTRIES: $150,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetHOSANNA HOUSE INC: $150,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMental Health America of Southwestern PA: $148,600 over 8y, 12% of budgetCENTER OF LIFE: $141,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetYOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $138,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetNICOLINAS WISHES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $137,000 over 3y, 55% of budgetCOMMUNITY GUIDANCE CENTER: $133,100 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHUGH LANE WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $132,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetYoung Black Motivated Kings & Queen: $125,500 over 2y, 21% of budgetFIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC: $121,448 over 2y, 12% of budgetHUMAN SERVICES CENTER: $119,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORPORATION: $114,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetARISE LAWRENCE COUNTY: $112,702 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetREIMAGINE REENTRY INC: $107,800 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetSOJOURNER HOUSE MOMS: $106,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetMETRO FAMILY PRACTICE INC: $104,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNITY RECOVERY: $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetALPHA HOUSE: $100,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetDISABILITY LEAD: $100,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetTHE DRAGON'S DEN: $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $97,084 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetSTO-ROX NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $95,050 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family Founda…The Pittsburgh Founda…The Grable FoundationThe Heinz EndowmentsRichard King Mellon F…The United Way of Sou…Opportunity FoundationFisa FoundationEden Hall FoundationThe Buhl FoundationThe Jack Buncher Foun…Upmc Group
Hillman Family FoundationsPA163.8× affinity117 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Opportunity Foundation · Fisa Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Upmc Group

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    78report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 386 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home