· Private foundation
Sierra Health Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k162 grants · $480k
- $10k–50k83 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
- $250k+1 grant · $590k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MGMT | $590,000 |
| SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA | $75,000 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS | $50,000 |
| CALIFORNIA STATE PROTOCOL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SOUTH SACRAMENTO CHRISTIAN CENTER CHURCH | $25,000 |
| REGENERATE CALIFORNIA INNOVATION | $25,000 |
| SACRAMENTO LITERACY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE | $25,000 |
| NEO PHILANTHROPY INC | $25,000 |
| FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL ACADEMIC YOUTH CORPS | $25,000 |
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CALIFORNIA ASIAN PACIFIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| HOLDING SPACE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $748k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 10% of Sierra Health Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
141 repeat relationships — 100 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 131 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERS4× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +73%
- UWUNITED WAY CALIFORNIA CAPITAL REGION2× · 2023–2024 · $195k · revenue +158%
- MAMUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK OF DEL PASO HEIGHTS3× · 2021–2023 · $113k · revenue +20%
Funded once
SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENTone grant, 2021 · $2.5M · revenue -19%- SFSOCIAL FINANCEone grant, 2023 · $150k
- FNFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
The New California Coalition (NCC) is a forward-thinking organization with a bold mission: to identify and implement solutions that will pave the way for enduring, generational change in Sacramento and across the entire state of California.
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
The California Urban Partnership's (CUP) mission is to build economic security in communities of color through policy research, education and organizing community action. We advocate for systems changes that increase investments to improve…
Our mission is to join diverse people, ideas, and resources to address the most pressing social and environmental justice priorities. We believe that the community concerns of Californias San Joaquin Valley (SJV) can only be addressed if…
The Organization's mission is to ensure that individuals and families experiencing homelessness or the risk of homelessness are able to access housing services and resources on their path to economic stability. The Organization is the lead…
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
The Organization advocates for health equity by leading and facilitating convenings in all regions of California for the purpose of providing policy analysis, research and training that promotes best practices, which supports the creation…
Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Forward and the most unlike its peers is Movement 4 Life Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
330 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 330 of the 436 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds SHF PROPERTIES INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS ↗
- Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY CALIFORNIA CAPITAL REGION ↗
- Who funds MUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK OF DEL PASO HEIGHTS ↗
- Who funds REDF ↗
- Who funds LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA BUDGET & POLICY CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Sierra Business Council ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds CATALYST CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TAHOE TRUCKEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Colour of Music ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL PUBLIC RADIO FDBA KXPR/KXJZ INC ↗
- Who funds THE FILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SACRAMENTO AND VICINITY ↗
- Who funds Sacramento Black Chamber of Commerce Foundation ↗
- Who funds HEALTH ACCESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
- Who funds GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CONSORTIUM FOR URBAN INDIAN HEALTH ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds HUMBOLDT AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FUNDERS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE ↗
- Who funds Northern California Grantmakers ↗
- Who funds Insure the Uninsured Project ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE WITH FAMILY FARMERS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The California Endowment · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Dignity Health · Sutter Valley Hospitals · United Way California Capital Region · Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services · Kelly Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sierra Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sierra Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sierra Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.