Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Wildlife Care Association

Wildlife Care Association (California) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $291,107 to it, the largest being Sacramento Region Community Foundation ($167,774). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$1.2M
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$291k
Net assets
$1.2M
4/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%
01What it does

What Wildlife Care Association does

Mission

Wildlife Care is dedicated to the rescue, rehabilitation and release of local wildlife. WCA is committed to educating and instructing the community in the respect, appreciation and care of local wildlife.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Our organization has been rescuing and rehabilitating wild animals for well over 40 years. Concerned citizens and government agencies bring us over 7,000 sick, orphaned, and injured animals each year including confiscated and displaced wild animals. With the help of trained staff, volunteers and local vets, WCA provides medical services to these animals. Once the animals have recovered from their injuries or illness, or have grown and learned to hunt and fend for themselves, they are released into the wild, giving them a second chance at life. We are regulated by the Federal and California Departments of Fish and Wildlife. Our work is entirely supported by donations.WCA was started as a community service organization by prominent Sacramento naturalists including MB Goodier, Effie Yeaw, and William B. Pond in 1975 and incorporated on May 18, 1978. On September 10, 1981, Wildlife Care Association became a Federal Exempt 501c(3) non-profit community service organization.

    $363,090 spent$246,781 earned by the program
    97% of program spending
  2. WCA has a busy schedule of educational presentations for local schools and organizations. Our education animals are an important part of these presentations. We also hold training classes for staff, interns, volunteers and members of the public. This too is supported by donations.

    $9,364 spent$97,143 earned by the program
    3% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $372,454.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($244k) Expenses 100 ($252k) Net assets 100 ($555k)2018 Revenue 100 ($245k) Expenses 101 ($254k) Net assets 98 ($546k)2019 Revenue 99 ($242k) Expenses 96 ($241k) Net assets 99 ($547k)2020 Revenue 161 ($394k) Expenses 114 ($287k) Net assets 118 ($654k)2021 Revenue 122 ($299k) Expenses 133 ($336k) Net assets 111 ($617k)2022 Revenue 189 ($461k) Expenses 148 ($373k) Net assets 127 ($705k)2023 Revenue 141 ($344k) Expenses 208 ($523k) Net assets 95 ($526k)2024 Revenue 498 ($1.2M) Expenses 201 ($507k) Net assets 223 ($1.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (498)Expenses (201)Net assets (223)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $529k to $1.2M (+133%).

$560k
$552k
$549k
$656k
$618k
$712k
$529k
$1.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 4% · 2019 4% · 2022 34% · 2024 7%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$8k
’17
−$9k
’18
$1k
’19
$107k
’20
−$37k
’21
$88k
’22
−$179k
’23
$709k
’24
23
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed33443635
Joined·+1+1+0+0+3+1+4
No longer listed·1001042
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income fell $45k → $32k.

5 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 91% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Wildlife Care Association’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 9 of 10 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Wildlife Care Association leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

91% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Wildlife Care Association.

58%
largest funder
86%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 66% · 2018 79% · 2019 72% · 2020 69% · 2021 51% · 2022 87% · 2023 98% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of Wildlife Care Association's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 40% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

91% of Wildlife Care Association's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $28k that is directly attributable, 92% of it comes from funders outside California, across 3 states.

NY
CT
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’20
’21
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $264k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like Wildlife Care Association

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

66% of spending goes to programs.

Program 66%Management 34%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
0%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Wildlife Care Association: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Wildlife Care Association?
Wildlife Care Association (California) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $291,107 to it, the largest being Sacramento Region Community Foundation ($167,774). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Wildlife Care Association have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $291,107 in grants to Wildlife Care Association, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Wildlife Care Association?
Sacramento Region Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $167,774 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Wildlife Care Association find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Wildlife Care Association →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing