Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS.

$23M
Granted FY2024still arriving
140
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$6.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$69MHuman Services$13MCommunity Improvement$8.5MHousing & Shelter$7.9MEducation$7.4MYouth Development$4.6MCivil Rights$3.6MFood & Nutrition$3.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 140 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 140 grants below total $21,385,365 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $22,553,306 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,167,941 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $140k
  • $10k–50k50 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k53 grants · $6.1M
  • $250k+17 grants · $14M
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLSPACE HEALTH$6,161,930
HEALTHY COMM FORUM FOR THE GREATER SACRAMENTO RGN$1,475,658
OLE HEALTH$823,516
SACRAMENTO NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CTR INC$750,000
GRANITE WELLNESS CENTERS$550,020
SACRAMENTO STEPS FORWARD$500,000
GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS$470,388
SACRAMENTO METRO CHAMBER FNDT$438,500
VALLEY CONSORTIUM FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION$416,186
GATHERING INN$412,538
NEIGHBORHOOD WELLNESS FNDT$400,000
SACRAMENTO LGBT COMMUNITY CTR$358,333
TOURO UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA$342,329
SALVATION ARMY$306,000
STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS$250,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $12.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SENIORS FIRST: $195k → 6%SENIORS FIRST: $176k → 6%CATHOLIC CHARIT OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $308k → 12%CASA DE ESPERANZA INC: $133k → 15%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY INC: $525k → 16%SENIORS FIRST: $163k → 6%CC DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $305k → 12%SENIORS FIRST: $160k → 6%CATHOLIC CHAR OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $270k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARIT OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $235k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DIOC OF STOCKTON: $127k → 12%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $228k → 15%STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS: $250k → 12%CATH CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $91k → 12%WOMENS CENTER YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $91k → 12%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $143k → 15%STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS: $250k → 12%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $141k → 15%STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS: $250k → 12%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $110k → 15%STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS: $250k → 12%STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS: $127k → 12%STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS: $125k → 12%HAVEN WOMENS CENTER: $157k → 15%HEALTHY ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS: $124k → 15%HAVEN WOMENS CENTER: $105k → 15%SIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $103k → 15%SIERRA COMMUNITY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 6%SIERRA VISTA CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $101k → 15%SIERRA COMMUNITY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 6%SIERRA COMMUNITY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $100k → 6%SIERRA VISTA CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 15%TRACY COMM CONN CTR: $290k → 12%TRACY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CENTER INC: $135k → 12%TRACY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CENTER INC: $135k → 12%GATHERING INN: $462k → 6%GATHERING INN: $413k → 6%GATHERING INN: $350k → 6%GATHERING INN: $275k → 6%GATHERING INN: $139k → 6%GATHERING INN: $135k → 6%GATHERING INN: $105k → 6%GATHERING INN: $91k → 6%SACRAMENTO STEPS FORWARD: $625k → 12%SACRAMENTO STEPS FORWARD: $500k → 12%SACRAMENTO STEPS FORWARD: $200k → 12%SACRAMENTO STEPS FORWARD: $196k → 12%SACRAMENTO STEPS FORWARD: $91k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$125M · 188 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

188 repeat relationships — 112 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

188
109

Total granted

$125M
$8.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+10%

Still filing today

83%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WELLSPACE HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34M · revenue +303%
  • HC
    Healthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9.7M · revenue +405% · 34% of their budget
  • VC
    Valley Consortium for Medical Education
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • PC
    PLACER COUNTY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES DEPT
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $510k · revenue +839% · 79% of their budget
  • UW
    UNITED WAY CALIFORNIA CAPITAL REGIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $502k · revenue +158%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sacramento Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Foundation

Our mission is to strengthen the regions business community by providing education, technical assistance, access to capital, procurement facilitation and workforce development training.

Community Improvement
2
Statewide California Coalition

The New California Coalition (NCC) is a forward-thinking organization with a bold mission: to identify and implement solutions that will pave the way for enduring, generational change in Sacramento and across the entire state of California.

Public Benefit
3
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
4
Capital Black Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the Sacramento Black chamber of commerce is to assure member businesses will benefit through services that sustain and increase their revenue. Additionally, the region will benefit through the growth of African American…

—
5
Sierra Business Council

Catalyze and demonstrate innovative approaches and solutions to increase community vitality, economic prosperity, environmental quality, and social fairness in the Sierra Nevada.

Education
6
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
7
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
8
Community Initiatives for Collective Impact

Our mission is to join diverse people, ideas, and resources to address the most pressing social and environmental justice priorities. We believe that the community concerns of Californias San Joaquin Valley (SJV) can only be addressed if…

Community Improvement
9
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
Credit Unions in the State of California Sierra Central Credit Union

As your financial institution, we pledge to serve you and our community faithfully. we will be friendly, helpful, and professional, and we will provide great products and competitive rates.

—
11
Solano Community Foundation

The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…

Philanthropy
12
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Forward and the most unlike its peers is Sacramento Kings Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr15%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr15%42%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%4/328
the rest of the field
14%
2,699/19,748

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

271 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 271 of the 330 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

22
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
78
Early backer (in before they grew)
258/271
Grantees still filing
190/271
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WELLSPACE HEALTH — $34,358,970 · HealthWELLSPACE HEALTHHealthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks — $9,705,427 · HealthHealthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Co…GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS — $2,478,948 · HealthLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC — $2,252,986 · Health+32 more — $13,520,967 · Health+32 moreCOMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS — $3,402,159 · OtherCOMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERSCITY OF VALLEJO — $3,000,000 · OtherCITY OF VALLEJOCity of Sacramento — $2,196,149 · OtherPLACER COUNTY OF OFFICE OF EDUCATION — $2,125,000 · OtherTOURO UNIVERSITY — $1,767,677 · OtherSacramento LGBT Community Center — $1,560,500 · Other+102 more — $29,549,663 · Other+102 moreTHE GATHERING INN — $1,969,236 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERI…Sacramento Steps Forward — $1,759,366 · Human ServicesSacramento …CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON — $1,677,411 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CH…STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS dba STANFORD SIERRA YOUTH & FAMILIES — $1,251,500 · Human ServicesSTANFORD YO…TRACY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CENTER INC — $1,155,497 · Human ServicesTRACY COMMU…SENIORS FIRST INC — $994,549 · Human ServicesSENIORS FIR…Healthy Alternatives to Violent Environm — $690,649 · Human ServicesYolo Crisis Nursery — $641,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES — $634,744 · Human ServicesSutter Yuba Homeless Consortium — $598,820 · Human Services+17 more — $2,520,849 · Human Services+17 moreNeighborhood Wellness Foundation — $1,290,754 · Community ImprovementCommunity Partnership for Families of San Joaquin — $1,194,888 · Community ImprovementMIDTOWN SACRAMENTO PBID CORPORATION — $836,500 · Community ImprovementGREATER SACRAMENTO AREA ECONOMIC COUNCIL — $440,000 · Community ImprovementVALLEY VISION — $301,331 · Community ImprovementALCHEMIST CDC — $200,000 · Community ImprovementYUBA SUTTER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $161,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $281,000 · Community ImprovementSACRAMENTO METRO CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $1,052,203 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Stanislaus County — $852,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY CALIFORNIA CAPITAL REGION — $501,500 · PhilanthropySECOND HARVEST OF THE GREATER VALLEY — $421,000 · PhilanthropyNEHEMIAH COMMNITY REINVESTMENT — $334,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Merced County — $216,000 · PhilanthropyGOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS FOUNDATION — $184,976 · Philanthropy+2 more — $145,000 · PhilanthropyYOLO FOOD BANK — $1,335,000 · Food & NutritionH3O FOUNDATION — $697,200 · Food & NutritionFOOD LITERACY CENTER — $605,900 · Food & NutritionFEEDING THE FOOTHILLS — $190,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY — $151,200 · Food & NutritionYuba Sutter Gleaners Food Bank Inc — $142,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $53,845 · Food & NutritionValley Consortium for Medical Education — $2,509,669 · EmploymentSOIL BORN FARM URBAN AGRICULTURE PROJECT — $164,000 · Employment3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Employment
Health$62,317,298Other$43,601,148Human Services$13,894,121Community Improvement$4,705,473Philanthropy$3,707,179Food & Nutrition$3,175,145Employment$2,773,669

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWELLSPACE HEALTH — $34,358,970 over 8y, 9.3% of budgetHealthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks — $9,705,427 over 8y, 34% of budgetCOMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS — $3,402,159 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetValley Consortium for Medical Education — $2,509,669 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetGOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS — $2,478,948 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC — $2,252,986 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSACRAMENTO NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER — $2,000,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTHE GATHERING INN — $1,969,236 over 8y, 10% of budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY — $1,767,677 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSacramento Steps Forward — $1,759,366 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON — $1,677,411 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTERS INC — $1,642,277 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSacramento LGBT Community Center — $1,560,500 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetSHADY CREEK OUTDOOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,350,428 over 6y, 89% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK — $1,335,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,325,239 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS ALLIANCE — $1,297,483 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetNeighborhood Wellness Foundation — $1,290,754 over 2y, 54% of budgetSTANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS dba STANFORD SIERRA YOUTH & FAMILIES — $1,251,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCommunity Partnership for Families of San Joaquin — $1,194,888 over 7y, 10% of budgetTRACY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CENTER INC — $1,155,497 over 7y, 50% of budgetPRO Youth and Families — $1,120,180 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO METRO CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $1,052,203 over 7y, 55% of budgetSENIORS FIRST INC — $994,549 over 8y, 15% of budgetUnited Way of Stanislaus County — $852,500 over 5y, 18% of budgetMIDTOWN SACRAMENTO PBID CORPORATION — $836,500 over 8y, 20% of budgetOLE HEALTH — $823,516 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC — $805,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU — $789,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetLatino Leadership Council Inc — $767,147 over 8y, 11% of budgetH3O FOUNDATION — $697,200 over 6y, 59% of budgetHealthy Alternatives to Violent Environm — $690,649 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetSACRAMENTO DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC — $678,550 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $677,500 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetYolo Crisis Nursery — $641,500 over 6y, 31% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES — $634,744 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS — $625,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMODESTO GOSPEL MISSION — $615,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetFOOD LITERACY CENTER — $605,900 over 4y, 36% of budgetSutter Yuba Homeless Consortium — $598,820 over 6y, 22% of budgetGIGI'S PLAYHOUSE INC — $588,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetGRANITE WELLNESS CENTERS — $550,020 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetMISSION MERCED INCORPORATED — $540,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetLos Rios Colleges Foundation — $540,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetMODESTO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $531,713 over 3y, 65% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC — $510,000 over 1y, 79% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Placer County — $510,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetUNITED WAY CALIFORNIA CAPITAL REGION — $501,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WELLSPACE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Healthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Valley Consortium for Medical Education ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN VALLEY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING INN ↗
  • Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Sacramento Steps Forward ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Sacramento LGBT Community Center ↗
  • Who funds SHADY CREEK OUTDOOR EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOLO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Wellness Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STANFORD YOUTH SOLUTIONS dba STANFORD SIERRA YOUTH & FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds Community Partnership for Families of San Joaquin ↗
  • Who funds TRACY COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO Youth and Families ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO METRO CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SENIORS FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Stanislaus County ↗
  • Who funds MIDTOWN SACRAMENTO PBID CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds OLE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU ↗
  • Who funds Latino Leadership Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds H3O FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Healthy Alternatives to Violent Environm ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Com…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Teichert FoundationDignity HealthSierra Health Foundat…Sierra Health Foundat…Kelly FoundationPlacer Community Foun…Stanislaus Community …United Way California…California Foundation…Public Health Institu…
Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA107.4× affinity69 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Teichert Foundation · Dignity Health · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Sierra Health Foundation · Kelly Foundation · Placer Community Foundation · Stanislaus Community Foundation · United Way California Capital Region · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Public Health Institute

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sutter Valley Hospitals funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
72report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 330 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines