How much did SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK AND FAMILY SERVICES grant in FY2022?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK AND FAMILY SERVICES’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

bettervisioneverychoicesviolenceiu-mienrelief

2020

groceries insecurewedidnotconductannualfundraisingandfoodgiveaway weassistedthecolusacountyministerialassociationwiththeirfoodgiveawaycolusacountyfoodbasketassociationconductedcannedfooddrivesandworkedwithcolusacountyministerialassociationontheannualfooddistributionweassistedthecolusacountyministerialassociationwiththeirfoodgiveawaycolusacountyfoodbasketassociationconductedcannedfooddrivesandworkedwithcolusacountyministerialassociationontheannualfooddistribution wealsopurchasedalloftheboxesneededtoputthefoodinpredicatedprovisionmaintenanceoperation

2021

sda churchunifiedlow incomeincome personspersons affordablefacilities predicatedpredicated provision

2022

distribution diaperssouth christianjointunified districtministriesyolopantry

2023

distribution diapersdistribution clothingdiapers clothingclothing suppliesjointsda churchhungry

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

Under $10k9 grants · $46k
$10k–50k11 grants · $194k

$10,852

Median grant

States reached

$50M

Total assets

Largest grants

G-7 THY PRESENCE'S SCHOOL OF FAITH MINISTRIES$26,920
SUNRISE CHRISTIAN FOOD MINISTRY$24,920
MANNA FOOD BANK$20,000
AL-MISBAAH$19,705
THE SALVATION ARMY - CENTER OF HOPE$19,600
CARMICHAEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FOOD CLOSET$17,852
SACRAMENTO SAMOA NEW COVENANT CHURCH$16,673
BRIDGES AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM$16,031
SOUTH COUNTY SERVICES$11,568
VALLEY HI COVENANT CHURCH$10,852
ROSE FAMILY CREATIVE EMPOWERMENT CENTER$10,354
DAUGHTERS OF ZION ENTERPRYZ$9,718
SOUTH SACRAMENTO INTERFAITH PARTNERSHIP$9,658
ANTIOCH PROGRESSIVE$9,485
SHILOH BAPTIST CHURCH$5,574

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$287k · 11 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +245% since the first grant, against +207% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$287k

$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+245%

+207%

Still filing today

45%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementReligionYouth DevelopmentEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SC
SOUTH COUNTY-WAL SERVICES
6× · 2018–2023 · $39k · revenue +16%
A
AL-MISBAAH-TEFAP
3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +842%
DO
DAUGHTERS OF ZION ENTERPRYZ
6× · 2018–2023 · $22k · revenue +587%

Funded once

RC
RIVER CITY FOOD BANKgraduated
6× · 2018–2023 · $46k · revenue +207%
SS
SOUTH SACRAMENTO CHRISTIAN CENTER
4× · 2018–2022 · $25k
PA
PURPOSE AND LEGACY
6× · 2018–2023 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Central California Food Bank

Distribute food to the hungry in fresno, madera, tulare, kern and kings county.

Food & Nutrition

Sacramento Neighborhood Housing

To improve and restore district-wide neighborhoods for the benefit of the residents.

Housing & Shelter

Everyones Harvest

Everyone's Harvest's mission is to provide access to healthy, affordable fruits and vegetables through certified farmers markets and community food programs.

Food & Nutrition

Interfaith Food Ministry Nevada County

A community where no one should feel the hurt of hunger. Interfaith Food Ministry feeds the hungry and works to reduce food insecurity in Nevada County. We help to sustain health, human dignity and the opportunity for individuals to…

Food & Nutrition

Foodlink for Tulare County Inc

FoodLink is committed to ending hunger by providing healthy food and nutrition education to those in need through community involvement.

Food & Nutrition

Family Promise of Sacramento

To provide temporary shelter and assistance to homeless families, and also to provide rental assistance in an effort to prevent families from becoming homeless. Program goal is to assist the families in their efforts to become…

Education

The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter

Daily Bowl

The mission of Daily Bowl is to glean, produce and distribute food and providing jobs to the community.

Food & Nutrition

Community Action of Napa Valley

To increase the self-determination and self-sufficiency of individuals and families who are in need.

Human Services

Extrafood

To help end hunger and food waste in californias bay area.

Food & Nutrition

South County Community Services

To alleviate hunger and homelessness in south santa clara county by providing food, housing and employment related services, and advocating for system changes to improve the quality of life for the most vulnerable people in the communities…

Food & Nutrition

Welcome Home Housing Inc

Welcome Home Housing is a non-profit organization in Sacramento California that provides affordable housing and services to individuals with mental illness.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank of El Dorado County and the most unlike its peers is Paratransit Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%4/215

the rest of the field

12%

1,001/8,702

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

105 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

96/105

Grantees still filing

78/105

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$336,378Human Services$66,837Community Improvement$45,543Religion$31,506Food & Nutrition$24,920Youth Development$21,503Education$9,882

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA74.3× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · United Way California Capital · Dignity Health · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Sierra Health Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Public Health Institute · Teichert Foundation · Pfund Family Foundation · California Foundation For · Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK AND FAMILY SERVICES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SUNRISE CHRISTIAN FOOD MNSTRY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue held over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 911877049 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SUNRISE CHRISTIAN FOOD MNSTRY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Sacramento Food Bank and Family Services?

Find your warmest path to Sacramento Food Bank and Family Services through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK AND FAMILY SERVICES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

105 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sacramento Food Bank and Family Services?

More from the funding graph

SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK AND FAMILY SERVICES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

105 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sacramento Food Bank and Family Services?

More from the funding graph