· Private foundation
Robert H & Susan F Castellini Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k92 grants · $210k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $449k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LINDNER CENTER OF HOPE | $200,000 |
| CATHEDRAL BASILICA OF ST PETER IN CHAINS | $200,000 |
| THE CHRIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| CINCINNATI REDS HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM | $100,000 |
| HOOVER INSTITUTION | $100,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CINCINNATI | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE | $100,000 |
| CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $50,000 |
| HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| CATHOLIC INNER CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FUND | $50,000 |
| ARTSWAVE | $31,000 |
| CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| WOMEN'S CARE CENTER CINCINNATI | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $652k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
152 repeat relationships — 78 still active in FY2025, 74 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- XUXAVIER UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +24%
- AEAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH7× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +0%
- TCThe Christ Hospital Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $925k · revenue +239%
Funded once
- IHIrish Heritage Center Charitable Foundation Incone grant, 2017 · $68k · revenue +24% · 32% of their budget
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.
See Disclosure Above.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation of Cincinnati Inc and the most unlike its peers is O Street Museum Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
221 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 221 of the 368 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds The Christ Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI USA REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI CENTER CITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI BASEBALL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSIC HALL REVITALIZATION COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHATFIELD EDGE ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HENDERSON COUNTY/HENDERSONVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
- Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds Irish Heritage Center Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CINCINNATI REDS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Arts and Technology Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Hcs Foundation · Farmer Family Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Millstone Fund · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Williams Foundation · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert H & Susan F Castellini Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.