· Private foundation
Hcs Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $712k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+8 grants · $4.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| XAVIER UNIVERSITY | $2,000,000 |
| THE SUMMIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $587,958 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $500,000 |
| CRAIG AND FRANCES LINDNER CENTER OF HOPE | $500,000 |
| ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI | $400,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CINCINNATI | $250,000 |
| BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC | $250,000 |
| CINCINNATI ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND | $250,000 |
| ST FRANCIS XAVIER CHURCH | $167,000 |
| WESLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES ORGANIZATION | $166,667 |
| OPTIMALL SERVICES INC | $150,500 |
| CC PRO FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| CINCINNATI WORKS INC | $120,000 |
| SETON EDUCATION PARTNERS | $100,000 |
| MIAMI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
67 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA5× · 2020–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +59%
- XUXAVIER UNIVERSITY4× · 2021–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +8%
- TCThe Christ Hospital Foundation3× · 2022–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +208%
Funded once
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -1%
- AGACCELERATE GREAT SCHOOLSone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue -97%
- XJXAVIER JESUIT ACADEMYone grant, 2023 · $625k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.
To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.
To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.
To resolve serious legal problems of low income people, to promote economic and family stability, and reduce poverty through effective legal assistance.
The mission of the cincinnati observatory is to maintain the integrity and heritage of an historic 19th century observatory and to educate, engage, and inspire our community about astronomy and science.
Cincinnati Public Radio is the trusted, independent source of journalism, music and culture empowering a vibrant, engaged and informed community.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…
The cincinnati usa convention & visitors bureau is an aggressive sales, marketing, and service organization. our primary responsibility is to positively impact the region's area economy through convention, tradeshow and visitor…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greater Cincinnati Foundation and the most unlike its peers is My Special Word. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds The Christ Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds Craig and Frances Lindner Center of Hope ↗
- Who funds BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE GREAT SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
- Who funds Bethany House Services Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds CCPRO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Living Arrangements for the Developmentally Disabled Inc ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Association for the Blind and Visually Impaired ↗
- Who funds Anthony Munoz Foundation ↗
- Who funds CISE ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Hands Together Inc ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds MAIN STREET VENTURES ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GREEN UMBRELLA ↗
- Who funds MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds KEN ANDERSON ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ProKids ↗
- Who funds TAFT MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALLEY VIEW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Magnified Giving ↗
- Who funds SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Farmer Family Foundation · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · The James J and Joan a Gardner Family Foundation · Robert H & Susan F Castellini Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Louise Taft Semple Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hcs Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hcs Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hcs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.