· Private foundation
Charles H Dater Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k112 grants · $3.0M
- $50k–250k23 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+2 grants · $525k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CINCINNATI | $275,000 |
| Greater Cincinnati Foundation | $250,000 |
| CINCINNATI PUBLIC RADIO | $175,000 |
| Bloc Ministries Inc | $100,000 |
| CET Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation | $100,000 |
| Last Mile Food Rescue | $75,000 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $75,000 |
| SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES | $75,000 |
| Freestore Foodbank | $75,000 |
| The Library Foundation of Cincinnati and Hamilton County | $75,000 |
| CISE | $60,000 |
| Taft Museum of Art | $60,000 |
| CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS | $60,000 |
| Valley Interfaith Community Resource Center | $50,000 |
| Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
193 repeat relationships — 114 still active in FY2024, 79 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $545k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPCincinnati Public Radio Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +51%
- FFFREESTORE FOODBANK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $995k · revenue +61%
- TCThe Children's Theatre of Cincinnati4× · 2021–2024 · $675k · revenue +274%
Funded once
- ZSZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATIone grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -20%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $125k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $125k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To resolve serious legal problems of low income people, to promote economic and family stability, and reduce poverty through effective legal assistance.
Unlocking the self-worth and potential of at-risk teens through the transformative power of art, a first-class environment and a character-building culture. Equipping at-risk teens with skills, credentials and pathways to employment.…
The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…
To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.
The Greater Cincinnati Film Commission is dedicated to maximizing the area's economic potential by attracting, promoting and cultivating film, television, and commercial production throughout Greater Cincinnati. Once filmmakers choose…
We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.
To offer children and young adults a top quality program that develops, trains and competes as competitive swimmers year-round in a supportive and motivating enviroment that respects, challenges and nurtures them as athletes, students, and…
To build broad based private/public partnerships supporting the conservation and enhancement of our City's parks and greenspaces.
The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.
Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citylink Center and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
172 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 172 of the 267 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Public Radio Inc ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CISE ↗
- Who funds TAFT MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds ProKids ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Inter Parish Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds ENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds Bethany House Services Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOC MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LEARNING GROVE INC ↗
- Who funds The Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDHOOD FOOD SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds COVERD GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds LAST MILE FOOD RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
- Who funds Found House-Interfaith Housing Network ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE WORKING COOPERATIVELY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALPAUGH FAMILY ECONOMICS CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds LA SOUPE INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK ↗
- Who funds Adopt A Class Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN KENTUCKY SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds STARFIRE COUNCIL OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Andrew Jergens Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Millstone Fund · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Louise Taft Semple Foundation · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles H Dater Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Charles H Dater Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Charles H Dater Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.