Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Prevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn

Prevent Cancer Foundation's mission is to empower people to stay ahead of cancer through prevention and early detection.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$4.5MEducation$2.7MHuman Services$1.1MInternational$250kCommunity Improvement$125kScience & Tech$70kPhilanthropy$50kArts & Culture$25kOther$4.4M
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 19 grants below total $1,762,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,863,600 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $101,600 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.7M
$100,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children's National Medical Center$150,000
Nevada Cancer Coalition$100,000
Jewish Community Free Clinic$100,000
Research Institute of Fox Chase Cancer Center$100,000
Emory University$100,000
Migrant Clinicians Network$100,000
Canoncito Band of Navajos Health Center Inc$100,000
Woodlawn Health$100,000
Moses-Weitzman Health System Inc$100,000
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center$100,000
One Community Health$100,000
Research Foundation for SUNY of University at Buffalo$100,000
Brigham and Women's Hospital$100,000
Rockefeller University$100,000
University of Oklahoma$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%Korean Community Services of Metro NY: $25k → 13%Farmworkers Self-Help Inc: $25k → 11%Catholic Charities - McCarrick Center: $52k → 8%Upstate Foundation: $25k → 14%Spanish Catholic Center: $136k → 14%Alliance Community Services: $25k → 8%Catholic Charities - McCarrick Center: $51k → 8%Spanish Catholic Center: $68k → 14%Spanish Catholic Center: $134k → 8%Southeast Asian MAA Coalition: $25k → 22%Spanish Catholic Center: $134k → 8%Spanish Catholic Center: $84k → 8%Spanish Catholic Center: $83k → 8%Moses-Weitzman Health System Inc: $100k → 14%Catholic Charities Medical Clinic: $75k → 14%Catholic Charities Volunteer Medical Clinic: $55k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.2M · 44 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
86

Total granted

$7.2M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+26%

Still filing today

73%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalScience & TechCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    6× · 2018–2024 · $758k · revenue +70%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $413k · revenue +47%
  • FH
    Family Health Partnership Clinic
    8× · 2017–2024 · $267k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +23%
  • TI
    The Institute For Cancer Research
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +14%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR HAITI INC
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
3
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
11
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
12
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hmh Hospitals Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Community College Foundatio…Lgbtq+ Community SupportSenior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%42%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/144
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,421

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
108/112
Grantees still filing
75/112
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $757,500 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERFamily Health Partnership Clinic — $266,500 · HealthFamily Health Partnership ClinicBASIC HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $245,000 · HealthBASIC HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INCCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $201,400 · HealthCITY OF HOPE — $200,000 · HealthThe Institute For Cancer Research — $200,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $200,000 · Health+53 more — $2,450,000 · Health+53 moreMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $300,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUTMD ANDERSON — $295,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN DIEGO — $292,500 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNI…Weill Medical College of Cornell Univers — $268,750 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell Unive…FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $250,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $205,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $162,500 · OtherUNVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA — $150,000 · Other+43 more — $2,572,492 · Other+43 moreGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $413,412 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $310,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERS…The Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $237,500 · EducationThe Research Foundation…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $220,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICIN…New York University — $200,000 · EducationNew York UniversityThe George Washington University — $162,500 · EducationThe George Washington U…University of Miami — $121,096 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $100,000 · EducationEmory University — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $100,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · Education+10 more — $474,547 · Education+10 moreSPANISH CATHOLIC CENTER INC — $744,083 · Human ServicesSPANISH C…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON — $130,087 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC …MOSES-WEITZMAN HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesMOSES-WEI…+6 more — $150,000 · Human Services+6 moreHOPE FOR HAITI INC — $150,000 · InternationalVOCES COALICION DE INMUNIZACION Y PROMOCIION DE LA SALUD INC — $100,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LUNG CANCER — $125,000 · Community ImprovementHUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY — $70,000 · Science & Tech
Health$4,520,400Other$4,496,242Education$2,739,055Human Services$1,124,170International$250,000Community Improvement$125,000Science & Tech$70,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $757,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPANISH CATHOLIC CENTER INC — $744,083 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $413,412 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $310,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Health Partnership Clinic — $266,500 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBASIC HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC — $245,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $237,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $220,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $205,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $201,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Institute For Cancer Research — $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $162,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON — $130,087 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LUNG CANCER — $125,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $121,096 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE COMMUNITY HEALTH — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRadiological Society of North America Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Jewish Community Free Clinic — $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA CANCER COALITION — $100,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetVOCES COALICION DE INMUNIZACION Y PROMOCIION DE LA SALUD INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSES-WEITZMAN HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $92,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED & AFFILIATES GROUP RETURN — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVITAL ACCESS CARE FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetGROUNDS FOR HEALTH INC — $75,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $69,547 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRhode Island Hospital — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…Direct ReliefNational Foundation f…Johns Hopkins Univers…Public Health Institu…Americares Foundation…American Heart Associ…Cornell UniversityCystic Fibrosis Found…The Children's Hospit…Vanderbilt University…Mayo Clinic
American Cancer Society IncGA45.4× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Direct Relief · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Public Health Institute · Americares Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Cornell University · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Mayo Clinic

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Prevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Hiv Alliance — 54% of income from government
  • Force-Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered Inc — 15% of income from government
  • One Community Health — 13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Tampa Family Health Centers Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Moses-Weitzman Health System Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 147 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines