Skip to content

Alabama · Nonprofit

HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY

HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY (Alabama) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $69,367,108 to it, the largest being HUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION ($55,652,859). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$52M
Funders on record
29
Grants received
$69M
Net assets
$179M
14/29 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%
01What it does

What Hudson-Alpha Institute for Biotechnology does

Mission

The primary mission of the institute will be to use the increasingly powerful research tools being developed in the biotechnology area to better understand the causes of certain diseases and to apply the findings of such research to help develop new and more effective treatments for such diseases. The institute's charitable mission contemplates numerous other activities all of which are intended to help further biotech research in alabama.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Activities, programs, and collaborations for the institute to accomplish its charitable objective of serving as a catalyst for biotechnology research and developement.

    $28,625,288 spent
    65% of program spending
  2. Activities, programs and collaborations for the institute to accomplish its charitable objective of providing a variety of educational outreach programs.

    $3,211,133 spent
    7% of program spending
  3. Activities, programs and collaborations for the institute to accomplish its charitable objective of developing, providing and advancing genomic medicine programs.

    $1,006,218 spent
    2% of program spending
  4. Activities, programs and collaborations for the institue to accomplish its charitable objective of creating economic growth in biotechnology related fields

    $10,987,073 spent
    25% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $43,829,712.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($51M) Expenses 100 ($62M) Net assets 100 ($95M)2018 Revenue 157 ($81M) Expenses 116 ($72M) Net assets 109 ($104M)2019 Revenue 272 ($140M) Expenses 95 ($59M) Net assets 197 ($187M)2020 Revenue 101 ($52M) Expenses 93 ($58M) Net assets 202 ($191M)2021 Revenue 88 ($45M) Expenses 101 ($63M) Net assets 186 ($177M)2022 Revenue 105 ($54M) Expenses 87 ($54M) Net assets 197 ($187M)2023 Revenue 120 ($62M) Expenses 97 ($60M) Net assets 200 ($190M)2024 Revenue 102 ($52M) Expenses 97 ($60M) Net assets 189 ($179M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (102)Expenses (97)Net assets (189)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $124M to $194M (+57%).

$117M
$124M
$194M
$212M
$189M
$226M
$221M
$206M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 22% · 2018 23% · 2019 14% · 2020 79% · 2021 54% · 2022 61% · 2023 53% · 2024 49%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

82% of HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (52% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 155 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$11M
’17
$8.9M
’18
$81M
’19
−$5.8M
’20
−$17M
’21
$29k
’22
$1.4M
’23
−$7.9M
’24
2.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Brian Pollock

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2730303030304038
Joined·+6+2+1+1+5+12+5
No longer listed·3211527
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 11 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $6.7M → $9.8M.

8 of 29 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $654k from 4 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Alabama Power Foundation Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY raised.

From the IRS filings of HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 28 of 29 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 80% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY.

80%
largest funder
96%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 89% · 2018 96% · 2019 46% · 2020 63% · 2021 80% · 2022 89% · 2023 95% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

28% of HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

95% of HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY's grant income comes from Alabama funders.

MN
IL
NY
CA
VA
MD
TN
AL
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Alabama out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $10M arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin−15% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.0mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 149 science & tech nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Government funding HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $121.0M on record.

Federal$121.0M
grants $120.4Mcontracts $680k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$97.2M
  • National Science Foundation$18.5M
  • Department of Agriculture$4.5M
  • Department of Commerce$566k
  • Department of Defense$147k
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$100k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alabama

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

73% of spending goes to programs.

Program 73%Management 25%Fundraising 2%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

65%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 7 related entities

  • Hudsonalpha Clinical Services Lab · disregarded
  • Smith Family Clinic for Geomic · disregarded
  • Hudsonalpha Health Alliance LLC · disregarded
  • Testing for America LLC · disregarded
  • Hudsonalpha Institute Accelerator · disregarded

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY?
HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY (Alabama) receives grants from 29 organizations whose IRS filings report $69,367,108 to it, the largest being HUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION ($55,652,859). 14 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY have?
IRS filings report 29 organizations giving $69,367,108 in grants to HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY, 14 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY?
HUDSONALPHA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $55,652,859 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like HUDSON-ALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alabama. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Hudson-Alpha Institute for Biotechnology →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 29 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing