Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery Corporation

American kennel club companion animal recovery (akc car)'s mission is to promote identification of pets and reunite lost pets with their owners.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
200
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Public Safety & Disaster$3.3MCrime & Legal$2.2MAnimals$900kArts & Culture$100kEducation$40kPhilanthropy$23kReligion$8kHealth$8k
02FY2024 · 200 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 200 grants below total $1,591,550 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,929,527 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $337,977 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k198 grants · $1.5M
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The American Kennel Club Museum of the Dog$100,000
Savannah Police Department$10,000
Lumberton Police Department$7,500
Knox County Sheriff's Office$7,500
Freeborn County Sheriff's Office$7,500
West Salem Police Department$7,500
Camden County Sheriff's Office$7,500
Morehead City Police Department$7,500
Kaufman County Sheriff's Office$7,500
Vanderburgh County Sheriff's Office$7,500
Atlantic County Sheriff's Office$7,500
Kearney Police Department$7,500
Ottawa County Sheriff's Office$7,500
Abilene Police Department$7,500
Hancock County Sheriff's Office$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS OF VENTURA COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES: $10k → 10%Friends of Ventura County Animal Services: $10k → 10%HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 76 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +229% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

76 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 154 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
406

Total granted

$2.0M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+229%
+10%

Still filing today

4%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsCrime & LegalEducationPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The American Kennel Club Museum of the Dog
    7× · 2018–2024 · $710k · revenue +229%
  • SP
    ST PAUL POLICE K-9 FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $23k · revenue +6%
  • AS
    ANIMAL SERVICES FOUNDATION OF VENTURA COUNTY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +253%

Funded once

  • AK
    AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -54%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF COUNTYPETS
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +90%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Operational K9 Medical Team of Wisconsin
Animals
2
High Desert Police K9 Association
3
The K9 Fund

The primary purpose of the organization is to provide funding for the purchase, training, equipment, and veterinary care for los angeles police department metropolitan k9 unit.

4
Minneapolis Police K-9 Foundation

To provide dogs to the police k9 unit

Crime & Legal
5
Florida Animal Protection Foundation
Animals
6
Novato Police K9 Foundation

Our mission is to partner with the novato police department for the acquisition of canines, to assist in their healthcare needs, to provide support for their training and to foster good relations between the police department and the…

Animals
7
Woodbury Police K9 Fund
Animals
8
Back the Blue K-9 Force

To provide the safety and medical needs of Law Enforcement K-9's. This includes protective vests, needed equipment, surgeries, etc. Requests for needed equipment are made by the K-9 handlers.

Animals
9
Sacramento Police Canine Association

Care for retired police canine dogs.

Animals
10
PAWS4LAW Foundation

To provide support for the canine units of local police departments.

Crime & Legal
11
Coins for K9S
Animals
12
Valpo K-9 Association Inc

Support valparaiso indiana police k9

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Sonoma County and the most unlike its peers is Sapulpa Area Chamber Foundatio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFallen First Responder Supp…Community FoundationsPublic University Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersAnimal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%11%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%8%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.1%1/685
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,818,880

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 638 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
21/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+179 more — $2,342,750 · Other+179 moreThe American Kennel Club Museum of the Dog — $710,000 · Arts & CultureThe American Kennel Club…AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · AnimalsVeterinarians for Puerto Rico Corp — $20,000 · AnimalsOPERATION PETS ALIVE — $10,000 · AnimalsHumane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC — $10,000 · AnimalsANOTHER CHANCE RFT — $10,000 · AnimalsLOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY — $10,000 · AnimalsFLORIDA VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · AnimalsHumane Society Of Southeast Texas — $10,000 · AnimalsNORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP — $10,000 · AnimalsMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER MIAMI-DADE FOR POCTA AAP — $10,000 · AnimalsDurango Kennel Club Inc — $7,637 · AnimalsTexas A&M Foundation — $25,000 · EducationLOUISIANA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $7,500 · EducationST PAUL POLICE K-9 FOUNDATION — $22,500 · Crime & LegalHARRISONBURG POLICE FOUNDATION — $7,500 · Crime & LegalTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $22,500 · PhilanthropyANIMAL SERVICES FOUNDATION OF VENTURA COUNTY — $20,000 · Human ServicesNETWORK FOR GOOD — $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$2,342,750Arts & Culture$710,000Animals$177,637Education$32,500Crime & Legal$30,000Philanthropy$22,500Human Services$20,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe American Kennel Club Museum of the Dog — $710,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetAMERICAN KENNEL CLUB CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $22,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST PAUL POLICE K-9 FOUNDATION — $22,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetVeterinarians for Puerto Rico Corp — $20,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetANIMAL SERVICES FOUNDATION OF VENTURA COUNTY — $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetOPERATION PETS ALIVE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHumane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY ANIMAL CARE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetPetaluma Animal Services Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISIANA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRISONBURG POLICE FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The American Kennel Club Museum of the Dog
  • Who funds AMERICAN KENNEL CLUB CANINE HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST PAUL POLICE K-9 FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Veterinarians for Puerto Rico Corp
  • Who funds ANIMAL SERVICES FOUNDATION OF VENTURA COUNTY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Center for Technology and Civic LifeIL42.5× affinity90 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Center for Technology and Civic Life · Our Rescue · Best Friends Animal Society · The Golden Leaf Inc · Ucare Foundation · Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation Inc · K9s4cops Inc · Ucare Minnesota · Minnesota Historical Society · Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund Inc · Humane World for Animals Inc · National Recreation and Park Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 638 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph