Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

BREAKING CHAINS

BREAKING CHAINS (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $118,462 to it, the largest being OUR RESCUE ($60,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$154k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$118k
Net assets
$311k
2/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 36%
01What it does

What Breaking Chains does

Mission

TO fight for the freedom of innocent children who have been caught in the chains of prostitution, sex trafficking and sexual abuse.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Abolition: Breaking Chains actively works to eliminate sexual exploitation and human trafficking by conducting investigations and working with law enforcement in Latin America and the USA. Governmental agencies, such as various child services bureaus, often refer victims and cases of child sex trafficking, or other child sexual abuse, to us. We have built several experienced operations teams adept at performing covert investigations needed for authorities to take action. Through outreach, networking, intelligence gathering and targeted prayer, we have been instrumental in the rescue of over 4,000 victims since our inception. In addition, the ministry combats human trafficking and sexual exploitation by raising awareness through our website, speaking engagements, awareness events and other activities.Aftercare: Breaking Chains works to bring healing, deliverance, and restoration to victims of sexual exploitation and trafficking. For this purpose, we have developed a specialized aftercare program with a holistic approach that includes Bible study, discipleship, life skills and vocational training. The program, when implemented in Central America and most recently in the Caribbean,…

    $146,451 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2023 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $146,451.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($165k) Expenses 100 ($164k) Net assets 100 ($107k)2018 Revenue 116 ($190k) Expenses 136 ($224k) Net assets 69 ($74k)2019 Revenue 94 ($155k) Expenses 89 ($146k) Net assets 77 ($83k)2020 Revenue 107 ($177k) Expenses 97 ($158k) Net assets 94 ($101k)2021 Revenue 114 ($188k) Expenses 94 ($155k) Net assets 126 ($135k)2022 Revenue 143 ($235k) Expenses 100 ($164k) Net assets 192 ($206k)2023 Revenue 135 ($222k) Expenses 96 ($157k) Net assets 253 ($272k)2024 Revenue 102 ($169k) Expenses 92 ($151k) Net assets 270 ($289k)2025 Revenue 94 ($154k) Expenses 81 ($133k) Net assets 290 ($311k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (94)Expenses (81)Net assets (290)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $139k to $245k (+76%).

$108k
$76k
$84k
$102k
$139k
$245k
$301k
$316k
$333k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of BREAKING CHAINS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$659
’17
−$33k
’18
$9k
’19
$18k
’20
$33k
’21
$71k
’22
$65k
’23
$18k
’24
$21k
’25
2.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20222023
Listed44
Joined·+0
No longer listed·0
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $60k → $41.

Funder
'17
'18
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
Our Rescueunclassified
$60k
$47k
funders
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1

3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 10% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BREAKING CHAINS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BREAKING CHAINS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BREAKING CHAINS.

51%
largest funder
99%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 96% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

BREAKING CHAINS draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 2 states in all.

UT
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $11k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

BREAKING CHAINS runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin14% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like BREAKING CHAINS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

82%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

CA
NC

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BREAKING CHAINS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BREAKING CHAINS?
BREAKING CHAINS (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $118,462 to it, the largest being OUR RESCUE ($60,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BREAKING CHAINS have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $118,462 in grants to BREAKING CHAINS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BREAKING CHAINS?
OUR RESCUE is the largest funder on record, with $60,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BREAKING CHAINS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Breaking Chains →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing