· Public charity
Safe House Project Inc
Safe house project's mission is to increase survivor identification beyond one percent through education, provide emergency services and placement to survivors, and ensure every survivor has access to safe housing and holistic care by accelerating safe house capacity and development across america.our vision is to unite communities to…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $313,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $366,437 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $52,937 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EDEN CENTERS | $40,000 |
| EDENS GLORY | $40,000 |
| ALABASTER JAR PROJECT | $40,000 |
| RESCUE 1 GLOBAL | $30,000 |
| RANCH HANDS RESCUE | $30,000 |
| PEOPLE AGAINST TRAFFICKING HUMANS INC (PATH) | $25,000 |
| RALEIGH DREAM CENTER | $25,000 |
| RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE | $20,000 |
| REFUGE FOR WOMEN LAS VEGAS | $20,000 |
| EMMAUS | $20,000 |
| THE COVERING HOUSE | $13,500 |
| SET FREE MONTEREY BAY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +120% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $284k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THThe Her Campaign3× · 2021–2023 · $107k · revenue +187%
- RFREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC3× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +25%
- KGKERUS GLOBAL EDUCATION4× · 2020–2023 · $79k · revenue +203%
Funded once
- TDTHE DEMAND PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +41%
- CTCALL TO FREEDOMone grant, 2022 · $46k · revenue +10%
- PAPRESENT AGE MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sojourn House exists to defend, restore, and liberate women who have been trafficked or exploited.
Rescue Hill helps survivors of human trafficking with recovery services and resources in a safe environment. Rescue Hill offers a stabilization home for survivors and their small children as well as advocacy services.
Restoring our youth by turning trauma into triumph for female suvivors of child sex trafficking in Georgia.
We exist to serve women who have been trafficked. through our confidential services, we offer a safe space for healing to begin while we compassionately reflect jesus to all we encounter.
The bridge 2 home is a safe and loving home for young girls and young women who were victimized by sex trafficking. at the bridge they can find healing and growth and can experience the love of a perfect heavenly father who pursues them.
Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…
Offer hope for a new life to young women and girls involved in domestic minor sex trafficking in the south king county area.
The covering house is a place of refuge and restoration for girls under the age of 18 who have been sexually exploited or trafficked.
Elijah Rising's mission is to end sex trafficking through prayer, awareness, intervention, and restoration.
House women with trauma, addiction
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Refuge for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kerus Global Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Her Campaign ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds KERUS GLOBAL EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds RESTORATION HOUSE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds SURVIVOR VENTURES INC ↗
- Who funds THE DEMAND PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CALL TO FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds ONE VOICE HOME ↗
- Who funds THE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Edens Glory ↗
- Who funds EDEN CENTERS ↗
- Who funds THE WELLHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WORTHWHILE WEAR INC ↗
- Who funds PRESENT AGE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Ranch Hands Rescue ↗
- Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
- Who funds RESCUE 1 GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
- Who funds LILY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds MICAH'S PROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds Set Free Monterey Bay ↗
- Who funds RALEIGH DREAM CENTER ↗
- Who funds PRISM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SWITCH ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE AGAINST TRAFFICKING HUMANS INC (AKA PATH) ↗
- Who funds RED OAK HOPE ↗
- Who funds FRONTLINE RESPONSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Justice Ministries ↗
- Who funds Amirah Inc ↗
- Who funds REAL ESCAPE FROM THE SEX TRADE ↗
- Who funds EMMAUS INC ↗
- Who funds STRAIGHT STREET REVOLUTION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SECRET PLACE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOM FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds JESUS HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Oasis Productions ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Jensen Project Inc · Our Rescue · Human Investment Foundation · Servant Foundation · Soteria Innovative Solutions · Slave 2 Nothing Foundation · Km Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Carmax Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Safe House Project Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Emmaus Inc — 10% of income from government
- Jesus House of Hope Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Safe House Project Inc?
Find your warmest path to Safe House Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.