Skip to content

Alaska · Nonprofit

Chugach Regional Resources Commission

Chugach Regional Resources Commission (Alaska) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,401,556 to it, the largest being SEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE ($649,241). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$7.1M
Funders on record
13
Grants received
$2.4M
Net assets
$4.7M
5/13 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Chugach Regional Resources Commission does

Mission

The Chugach Regional Resources Commission (the Commission) was established for the purpose of providing formal advocacy to manage natural resources in ways consistent with the cultural traditions of the Chugach Native people.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. To manage natural resources in ways consistent with the cultural traditions of the Chugach Native people.

    $4,334,121 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $4,334,121.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($446k)2018 Revenue 109 ($1.2M) Expenses 108 ($1.2M) Net assets 87 ($386k)2019 Revenue 117 ($1.2M) Expenses 116 ($1.3M) Net assets 74 ($331k)2020 Revenue 108 ($1.1M) Expenses 108 ($1.2M) Net assets 62 ($275k)2021 Revenue 286 ($3.0M) Expenses 182 ($2.0M) Net assets 287 ($1.3M)2022 Revenue 509 ($5.4M) Expenses 462 ($5.1M) Net assets 347 ($1.5M)2023 Revenue 456 ($4.8M) Expenses 404 ($4.5M) Net assets 487 ($2.2M)2024 Revenue 442 ($4.7M) Expenses 495 ($5.5M) Net assets 429 ($1.9M)2025 Revenue 674 ($7.1M) Expenses 498 ($5.5M) Net assets 1058 ($4.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (674)Expenses (498)Net assets (1058)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $4.4M to $6.9M (+56%).

$832k
$503k
$439k
$554k
$1.7M
$2.5M
$4.3M
$4.4M
$6.9M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 92% · 2018 78% · 2019 78% · 2020 81% · 2021 85% · 2022 94% · 2023 83% · 2024 73% · 2025 71%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$49k
’17
−$45k
’18
−$55k
’19
−$57k
’20
$1.0M
’21
$268k
’22
$345k
’23
−$808k
’24
$1.6M
’25
6.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Willow Hetrich

Executive Director

Board chair

Boyd Selanoff

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed889121614121219
Joined·+1+1+6+7+3+3+1+9
No longer listed·10335512
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $57k → $189k.

3 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $417k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Chugachmiut). These are real filings, and they are not money Chugach Regional Resources Commission raised.

From the IRS filings of Chugach Regional Resources Commission’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Chugach Regional Resources Commission leans on a few funders — its largest provides 27% of grant income and the top three 66%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Chugach Regional Resources Commission.

27%
largest funder
66%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 61% · 2018 74% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 77% · 2022 89% · 2023 61% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of Chugach Regional Resources Commission's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 38% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Chugach Regional Resources Commission draws 72% of its grant income from funders outside Alaska, across 7 states in all.

AK
ME
WA
NV
SD
CO
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Alaska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $51k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding Chugach Regional Resources Commission receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $14.2M on record.

Federal$14.2M
grants $13.7Mcontracts $510k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Commerce$6.6M
  • Department of Health and Human Services$2.9M
  • Department of the Interior$1.9M
  • Environmental Protection Agency$1.9M
  • Denali Commission$692k
  • National Science Foundation$98k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Chugach Regional Resources Commission

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alaska

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 21%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

90%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Chugach Regional Resources Commission: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Chugach Regional Resources Commission?
Chugach Regional Resources Commission (Alaska) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,401,556 to it, the largest being SEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE ($649,241). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Chugach Regional Resources Commission have?
IRS filings report 13 organizations giving $2,401,556 in grants to Chugach Regional Resources Commission, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Chugach Regional Resources Commission?
SEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE is the largest funder on record, with $649,241 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Chugach Regional Resources Commission find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alaska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Chugach Regional Resources Commission →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 13 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing