How much did National Community Reinvestment Coalition Inc grant in FY2024?

Housing & Shelter$4.4MCommunity Improvement$2.4MHuman Services$1.1MEmployment$1.0MEducation$500kMembership Benefit$471kPhilanthropy$239kCivil Rights$193kPublic Benefit$85kOther$2.5M

02FY2024 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $14k
$10k–50k40 grants · $965k
$50k–250k20 grants · $2.6M
$250k+2 grants · $550k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$122M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
NCRC DEVELOPMENT CORP	$300,000
SOUTHWEST ECONOMIC SOLUTIONS (MISIDE WEALTH)	$250,415
BLACK WOMEN BUILD - BALTIMORE INC	$200,000
PACIFIC ASIAN CONSORTIUM IN EMPLOYMENT (PACE)	$180,000
COULEECAP INC	$179,372
CORPORATION TO DEVELOP COMMUNITIES OF TAMPA INC	$150,000
LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CENTER	$150,000
CHICAGO COMMUNITY LOAN FUND	$150,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FL	$150,000
TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONS	$150,000
BRIDGEPORT NEIGHBORHOOD TRUST INC	$144,882
COALITION FOR NONPROFIT HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT	$130,556
WALNUT HILLS REDEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION	$125,000
CALIFORNIA CAPITAL FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORP	$125,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER NEW HAVEN	$125,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.7M · 53 repeat orgs$5.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.7M

$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%

+11%

Still filing today

87%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

EA
EMPOWERING AND STRENGTHENING OHIO'S PEOPLE INC
7× · 2017–2023 · $518k · revenue +508%
CI
COULEECAP INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $471k · revenue +107%
LN
LAFAYETTE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $341k · revenue +127%

Funded once

AF
AMERICANS FOR A FAIR DEAL
one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · 100% of their budget
LM
Lower Marshall-Shadeland Development Initiative
one grant, 2023 · $175k · revenue 0%
WA
WASHINGTON AREA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND INC
3× · 2021–2023 · $168k · revenue -46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc

Community based housing program designed to stabilize neighborhoods mainly through loans to home owners unable to obtain alternative financing and construction and rehabilitation of housing, related services include technical assistance,…

Housing & Shelter

Chattanooga Neighborhood Enterprise

Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…

Housing & Shelter

Chn Housing Capital

Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.

Human Services

Virginia Community Development Corp

VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.

Housing & Shelter

Housing Opportunities Inc

To assist low and moderate income families to secure and maintain ownership of housing.

Housing & Shelter

Housing Development Center

Centering those who have been historically oppressed, housing development center, inc. collaborates with its partners to envision, develop, and sustain affordable homes and community places.

Housing & Shelter

Neighborhood Housing Services of Hamilton Inc

Neighborhood housing services of hamilton, inc. is a nonprofit community development organization dedicated to building affordable, healthier, and stronger communities through partnerships with government, businesses, and local community…

Housing & Shelter

Community Housing Improvement Program

To provide healthy, sustainable, affordable housing to qualified residents of the north valley.

—

Community Development Corporation of Utah

The community development corporation of utah (cdcu) helps our community thrive by empowering people on their path toward financial security, housing stability, and access to affordable homes.we achieve this by:1. increasing financial…

Housing & Shelter

Home City Development Inc

1.to restore or replace substandard housing with a supply of decent, affordable, and well-managed housing for individuals and families.2.to facilitate neighborhood growth and health in collaboration with partners, leading to long-term…

Housing & Shelter

Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—

Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Affordable Homeownership Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The J H Walker Legacy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%3/166

the rest of the field

13%

240,393/1,819,399

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

148 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

142/148

Grantees still filing

84/148

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Housing & Shelter$4,367,536Community Improvement$2,394,767Other$2,978,773Human Services$1,082,138Employment$1,000,000Education$499,672Membership Benefit$471,244

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wells Fargo FoundationMN53.4× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wells Fargo Foundation · Opportunity Finance Network · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Citi Foundation · Prosperity Now · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · Capital One Foundation Inc · Tr Ua Fifth Third Foundation · National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Community Reinvestment Coalition Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines