Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Ohio · Nonprofit

WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS

WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS (Ohio) receives grants from 40 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,070,903 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Cincinnati ($1,018,154). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.8M
Revenue FY2024
40
Funders on record
$4.1M
Grants received
$3.6M
Net assets
25/40 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 42%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($2.5M)2018 Revenue 125 ($1.6M) Expenses 96 ($1.3M) Net assets 111 ($2.7M)2019 Revenue 117 ($1.5M) Expenses 92 ($1.3M) Net assets 120 ($3.0M)2020 Revenue 96 ($1.2M) Expenses 94 ($1.3M) Net assets 117 ($2.9M)2021 Revenue 108 ($1.4M) Expenses 95 ($1.3M) Net assets 120 ($3.0M)2022 Revenue 128 ($1.6M) Expenses 99 ($1.4M) Net assets 130 ($3.2M)2023 Revenue 120 ($1.5M) Expenses 113 ($1.5M) Net assets 135 ($3.3M)2024 Revenue 140 ($1.8M) Expenses 111 ($1.5M) Net assets 146 ($3.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (140)Expenses (111)Net assets (146)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 11% · 2018 10% · 2019 12% · 2020 31% · 2021 24% · 2022 29% · 2023 22% · 2024 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$107k
17
$270k
18
$217k
19
$76k
20
$65k
21
$261k
22
$30k
23
$245k
24
9.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 10 funders to 17 funders, grant income rose $264k → $513k.

7 of 40 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)10% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 40 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

72% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS.

25%
largest funder
51%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 26% · 2018 18% · 2019 33% · 2020 59% · 2021 19% · 2022 53% · 2023 22%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

48% of WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

75% of WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS's grant income comes from Ohio funders.

IL
NY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
KY
NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $400k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 40 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $346k on record.

Federal$346k
grants $346kcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$226k
  • Environmental Protection Agency$120k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

82% of spending goes to programs.

Program 82%Management 12%Fundraising 6%

Governance

17
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

79%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OH

Part of a family of 3 related entities

  • Working in Shelton Gardens LLC · disregarded
  • Working in Resettlement Housing · disregarded
  • Working in Senior Housing of South Cumminsville · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS?
WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS (Ohio) receives grants from 40 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,070,903 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Cincinnati ($1,018,154). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS have?
IRS filings report 40 organizations giving $4,070,903 in grants to WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS, 25 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS?
United Way of Greater Cincinnati is the largest funder on record, with $1,018,154 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WORKING IN NEIGHBORHOODS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 40funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing