How much did CHARITABLE HEALTHCARE NETWORK INC grant in FY2024?

CHARITABLE HEALTHCARE NETWORK INC reported 59 grants totaling $1,754,002 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is CHARITABLE HEALTHCARE NETWORK INC based?

CHARITABLE HEALTHCARE NETWORK INC is based in OH.

CHARITABLE HEALTHCARE NETWORK INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

CHARITABLE HEALTHCARE NETWORK INC

To strengthen and ensure high-quality health care for people who are vulnerable

$1.8M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$196k

Largest

01What you fund

0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$4.2MHuman Services$1.0MFood & Nutrition$270kCommunity Improvement$112kEducation$32kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$2.1M

02FY2024 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $25k
$10k–50k53 grants · $1.4M
$50k–250k3 grants · $301k

$29,137

Median grant

States reached

$9.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY$196,385
GOOD SAMARITAN FREE HEALTH CENTER$52,516
VIOLA STARTZMAN FREE CLINIC$52,516
GRACE CLINIC OF DELAWARE$39,885
COMMUNITY CARE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC$37,885
OPPORTUNITY PARISH ECUMENICAL NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRY FREE CLINIC$37,387
LIVING WELL CLINIC$37,385
OHIO VALLEY HEALTH CENTER$35,885
MEDWORKS$35,137
LIFECARE ALLIANCE$34,885
COLUMBUS FREE CLINIC$34,885
LA CLINICA LATINA$34,885
COMPASSIONATE CARE OF SHELBY COUNTY$34,512
HALIM CLINIC$34,449
PHYSICIANS CARE CONNECTION$33,137

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.6M · 60 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

60 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.6M

$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+7%

Still filing today

80%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SV
ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY
5× · 2020–2024 · $448k · revenue +68%
VS
VIOLA STARTZMAN FREE CLINIC
7× · 2017–2024 · $221k · revenue +24%
LC
LAKE COUNTY FREE CLINIC
7× · 2017–2024 · $211k · revenue +239%

Funded once

NC
NORTH COAST HEALTH MINISTRY
one grant, 2017 · $12k
BO
BELLBROOK OPEN ARMS FREE CLINIC
one grant, 2017 · $5k
PH
PARMA HEALTH MINISTRY
one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Cleveland Clinic Mercy Hospital

To provide quality, compassionate and affordable healthcare services.

Health

Cleco Primary Care Network Inc

Cleco primary care network's mission is to actively coordinate,integrate and improve the access to quality primary and preventive healthcare services, including the medically underserved citizens of cleveland county and surrounding…

Health

Southern Ohio Medical Center

Southern ohio medical center is an acute health care system located in portsmouth, ohio. somc's exempt purpose is to serve south central ohio and northeastern kentucky with state-of-the-art facilities and health care technologies.

Health

Community Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community service.

Health

Community Medical Center

Hospital serving ocean county and is committed to enhancing the overall health status of the community by providing the highest quality healthcare and related services.

Health

Iowa City Free Medical Clinic

We believe that access to affordable health care is a basic human necessity, and we strive to provide the widest range of medical and dental services possible to the people in the iowa city and surrounding community who would not otherwise…

Health

Mercymed of Columbus Inc

Mercymed of columbus, inc. (mercymed) exists to proclaim jesus christ as lord and to demonstrate his love by providing affordable, quality healthcare for the physical, spiritual and emotional needs of the underserved. as a non-profit…

Health

Calvary Community Clinic Inc

n response to the growing uninsured population in the East Tampa community, the free clinic addresses one of the most critical needs of the community which it serves. Within the 33604, 33610 and 33612 zip codes, 40% of the population has…

Health

Hope Clinic Inc

To spread the love of christ to the community by providing quality healthcare and spiritual guidance. the clinic's mission is to provide free medical care and spiritual guidance that minister to the whole person. the clinic will provide…

Human Services

Council of Community Clinics

A premier consortium of primary health care organizations, hcp is an advocate for its members who serve the health needs of communities throughout southern california, providing them with the voice and power to serve vulnerable populations.

—

OhioHealth Corporation

Our mission is to improve the health of those we serve.

Health

Christian Health Center of Howard County

The mission of the christian health clinic of howard county is to provide medical services, including dentistry and pharmacy, to the people of the county who cannot obtain medical care because of inability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compassionate Care of Shelby County and the most unlike its peers is Lifecare Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/62

the rest of the field

10%

4,595/44,260

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

52 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

50/52

Grantees still filing

38/52

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$4,182,233Other$2,066,299Human Services$1,013,798Food & Nutrition$269,663Community Improvement$112,088Education$31,861Housing & Shelter$9,889

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Association of Free AndVA47.1× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Association of Free And · Americares Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · The CareSource Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Healthpath Foundation of Ohio · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · Deaconess Health Associations Fund Inc · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Ohio Dental Association Foundation · Sostento Inc · The Dayton Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CHARITABLE HEALTHCARE NETWORK INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: VOCALIZE COLUMBUS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 10.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 853528926 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on VOCALIZE COLUMBUS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 85% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Charitable Healthcare Network Inc?

Find your warmest path to Charitable Healthcare Network Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CHARITABLE HEALTHCARE NETWORK INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

52 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Charitable Healthcare Network Inc?

More from the funding graph

CHARITABLE HEALTHCARE NETWORK INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

52 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Charitable Healthcare Network Inc?

More from the funding graph