· Private foundation
Maurice Amado Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k26 grants · $104k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $814k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $570k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UC DAVIS FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| URJ- CAMP NEWMAN | $100,000 |
| EVELYN RUBENSTEIN JCC OF HOUSTON | $85,000 |
| UCLA FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $55,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $50,000 |
| OSTROW SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY OF USC | $50,000 |
| KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION UNITED STATES | $45,000 |
| VINEYARD HAVENS | $45,000 |
| JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION | $40,000 |
| MAGEN DAVID ADOM | $35,000 |
| BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $34,000 |
| LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES | $30,000 |
| NEW MEXICANS TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE | $30,000 |
| THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $382k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2023, 37 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $673k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JMJOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2022 · $500k · revenue +118%
- TLTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES4× · 2020–2023 · $115k · revenue +20%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC4× · 2020–2023 · $110k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- NFNMDP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +15%
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +25%- SUSTANFORD UNIVERSITY PRODUCT REALIZATION LABone grant, 2022 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is To be Heard Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
134 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 134 of the 174 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds Evelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ECHOING GREEN INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SOLIDARITY INC ↗
- Who funds TENDERLOVE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Virginia Chamber Music Foundation ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Ivy Centennial Foundation ↗
- Who funds GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Larchmont-Mamaroneck Hunger Task Force Inc ↗
- Who funds MACHINE INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM ↗
- Who funds VINEYARD HAVENS INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Nonhuman Rights Project Inc ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Crestlea Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · Welfare Foundation Inc · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maurice Amado Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Aspetuck Land Trust — 28% of income from government
- Delaware Shakespeare Festival Inc — 18% of income from government
- Delaware Community Foundation Inc — 13% of income from government
- Delaware Symphony Association Inc — 11% of income from government
- Market Street Music Corporation — 11% of income from government
- Operadelaware Inc — 9% of income from government
- First State Ballet Theatre Inc — 8% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Community Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maurice Amado Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Maurice Amado Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.