· Private foundation
Mary Jean and Oliver Travers Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of MARY JEAN AND OLIVER TRAVERS FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k86 grants · $210k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $119k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GBMC | $15,000 |
| FRIENDS OF MARYLAND STATE PARKS | $13,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $13,000 |
| CALVERT SCHOOL | $12,500 |
| GOUCHER COLLEGE | $12,500 |
| KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE | $12,000 |
| MOTHER MARY LANGE CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $11,000 |
| SEWANEE & THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH | $10,000 |
| OCEAN CITY RECREATION BOOSTERS | $10,000 |
| UMS-WRIGHT PREPATORY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| MARYLAND CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| CASA OF MID SHORE | $7,500 |
| REDEEMER PARISH DAY SCHOOL | $7,000 |
| MARYLAND SPCA | $6,500 |
| LADEW GARDENS | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
102 repeat relationships — 80 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCALVERT SCHOOL INCORPORATED5× · 2021–2025 · $339k · revenue +40%
- GCGOUCHER COLLEGE5× · 2021–2025 · $67k · revenue +26%
- INIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC5× · 2021–2025 · $48k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- WOWHITE OAK FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $15k
- UOUniversity of Maryland Medical System Corporationone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +13%
- MUMACQUARIE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of umbwms is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality, personalized service and outstanding…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The organization's mission is to solicit and receive contributions and grants from the general public and to hold, invest, and administer these funds and pay expenditures for the benefit of the university of maryland in baltimore and to…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
To assist in the management of and to provide services to related healthcare affiliates.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The mission of baltimore washington medical center (bwmc) is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc Northern Chesapeake Region Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 189 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALVERT SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds GOUCHER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE LADEW TOPIARY GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ROANOKE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE MUSEUM OF INDUSTRY INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND RECREATION & PARKS ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS' LATIN SCHOOL OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MANOR CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND CLUB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Brian Cosgrove Memorial Fund ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND FAMILY NETWORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Middendorf Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation · The Kahlert Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mary Jean and Oliver Travers Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Baltimore Tree Trust Inc — 100% of income from government
- Maryland Family Network Inc — 66% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- Paul's Place Inc — 29% of income from government
- Araminta Freedom Initiative — 26% of income from government
- Baltimore Squashwise Inc — 23% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Maryland Historical Society Inc — 9% of income from government
- The Family Tree Inc — 9% of income from government
- Episcopal Housing Corporation — 8% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Industry Inc — 7% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Maryland Inc — 1% of income from government
- Goucher College — 0% of income from government
- Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- University of Maryland Medical System Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Naples Community Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.