· Community foundation
Humboldt Area Foundation
The foundation's vision is a thriving, just, healthy and equitable region.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 203 grants below total $7,928,888 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,744,298 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,815,410 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k42 grants · $303k
- $10k–50k112 grants · $2.2M
- $50k–250k47 grants · $4.8M
- $250k+2 grants · $626k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BETTY KWAN CHINN HOMELESS FOUNDATION | $313,845 |
| CHANGING TIDES FAMILY SERVICES | $311,938 |
| HUMBOLDT HUMANE | $240,265 |
| HUMBOLDT COAD | $225,100 |
| UPPER KLAMATH BASIN AGRICULTURAL COLLABORATIVE | $200,000 |
| CENTRO DEL PUEBLO MOVIMIENTO INDIGENA MIGRANTE | $164,000 |
| MID KLAMATH WATERSHED COUNCIL | $152,300 |
| SUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST | $143,000 |
| ARCATA FIRE DISTRICT | $140,000 |
| LEAVEY RANCH LLC | $131,450 |
| AMERICAN RIVERS INC | $130,000 |
| INK PEOPLE CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $126,100 |
| KARUK TRIBE | $125,000 |
| QUEER HUMBOLDT | $119,790 |
| HUMBOLDT SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER | $115,741 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
266 repeat relationships — 142 still active in FY2025, 124 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHumboldt Senior Resource Center9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +251%
- FFFOOD FOR PEOPLE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +106%
- BKBETTY KWAN CHINN HOMELESS FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $929k · revenue +198% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- HCHOPE CRISIS RESPONSE NETWORK INC- HCRNone grant, 2023 · $360k · revenue -57%
- CTCALIFORNIA TROUT INCone grant, 2024 · $330k · revenue +8%
- SFSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Activities within trinity, humboldt, del norte county, siskiyou and mendocino counties and to recruit and administer financial capital for such purposes.
CSERC protects water, wildlife, and wild places of the Northern Yosemite region.
Prevention of pet abuse, neglect, and over-population by providing temporary and permanent homes for abandoned cats and dogs and providing neutering and spaying services for these animals.
The Organization's mission is to provide temporary sanctuary and shelter for unwanted, lost and neglected animals, to promote the humane care and treatment of dogs and cats through education, and to actively advocate pet popluation control.
Northern California Sled Dog Rescue (NORSLED) is an all volunteer non-profit group dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating, fostering and finding new homes for unwanted, abused and abandoned siberian huskies, alaskan malamutes, samoyeds and…
The Siskiyou Land Conservancy is a state and federally approved non-profit organization that assists landowners who want to protect the natural values of their land, either through purchase or establishment of conservation easements.
Historical preservation
The Santa Clara River Conservancy represents the diverse interests of the Santa Clara River, from the flood plain to the highest tributaries, and seeks to secure, sustain, and manage significant lands and waters that provide habitat for…
At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.
To promote the sustainable use of natural resources and the protection of long-term biological diversity in the Yuba River watershed.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Happy Camp Community Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fern Cottage Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
319 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 319 of the 517 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Humboldt Senior Resource Center ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds BETTY KWAN CHINN HOMELESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN HUMBOLDT COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INK PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF HUMBOLDT INC ↗
- Who funds SEQUOIA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY HUMBOLDT SPONSORED PROGRAMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMBOLDT SPAYNEUTER NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ARCATA HOUSE PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Queer Humboldt ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HUMBOLDT HUMANE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds CAL POLY HUMBOLDT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLC ↗
- Who funds Cooperation Humboldt ↗
- Who funds MCKINLEYVILLE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE-GROUP ↗
- Who funds YOUNG FAMILY RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF THE REDWOODS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Companion Animal Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOPE CRISIS RESPONSE NETWORK INC- HCRN ↗
- Who funds TRUE NORTH ORGANIZING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Changing Tides Family Services ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA TROUT INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF EUREKA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Coast Central Credit Union · Christine & Jalmer Berg Foundation · Patricia D & William B Smullin Foundation · Humboldt Health Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · The Schmidbauer Family Foundation · St Joseph Hospital of Eureka · Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples Inc · Vintage Bmw House · First Nations Development Institute · The California Endowment · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Humboldt Area Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Upper Klamath Basin Ag Collaborative — 100% of income from government
- Brookings Community Resource Response — 17% of income from government
- United Way of Southwestern Oregon — 12% of income from government
- Sustainable Northwest — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.