Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Bigfoot Trail Alliance

Bigfoot Trail Alliance (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $378,390 to it, the largest being S H COWELL FOUNDATION ($267,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$370k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$378k
Net assets
$179k
2/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 89%
01What it does

What Bigfoot Trail Alliance does

Mission

The Bigfoot Trail Alliance is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that is working to support the establishment of the 360 mile route through the Klamath Mountains to celebrate the regions biodiversity. The BFTA fosters a community committed to maintaining, promoting, and protectingin perpetuitythe Bigfoot Trail.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Education- BFTA connects peopleespecially youthto the natural world through immersive, field-based learning. BFTAs programs blend ecological science, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and hands-on stewardship to cultivate curiosity, skills, and a deeper understanding of the landscapes of the Klamath Mountains and North Coast.

    $116,713 spentof which $122,829 as grants
    53% of program spending
  2. Trailwork- Bigfoot Trail Alliance (BFTA) trail crews and volunteers restore and maintain remote backcountry routes across Northwest California, reopening miles of trail lost to wildfire, storms, and time. Through hands-on stewardship, BFTA keeps these pathways aliveensuring safe passage for hikers, stock users, and future generations while protecting the ecological integrity of the landscapes they traverse.

    $101,130 spentof which $74,867 as grants$16,951 earned by the program
    46% of program spending
  3. Community Engagement- BFTA brings together volunteers, partners, and local communities to care for public lands. Through collaborative projects, events, and shared stewardship, BFTA builds lasting relationships that support both healthy ecosystems and resilient rural communitiesensuring that the work of conservation is both inclusive and enduring.

    $2,129 spent
    1% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $219,972.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20222022 Revenue 100 ($73k) Expenses 100 ($72k) Net assets 100 ($23k)2023 Revenue 221 ($161k) Expenses 200 ($143k) Net assets 181 ($41k)2024 Revenue 383 ($280k) Expenses 356 ($255k) Net assets 293 ($66k)2025 Revenue 506 ($370k) Expenses 359 ($258k) Net assets 790 ($179k)
2022202320242025
Revenue (506)Expenses (359)Net assets (790)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $146k to $205k (+41%).

$88k
$106k
$146k
$205k
2022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2024 34% · 2025 17%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of Bigfoot Trail Alliance’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$1k
’22
$18k
’23
$24k
’24
$112k
’25
9.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20242025
Listed1111
Joined·+3
No longer listed·3
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $8k → $72k.

2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Bigfoot Trail Alliance’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Bigfoot Trail Alliance leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

28% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Bigfoot Trail Alliance.

71%
largest funder
98%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 93% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

98% of Bigfoot Trail Alliance's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
MD

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $98k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Bigfoot Trail Alliance runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin30% · top quartile
Months of reserve9.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)72% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding Bigfoot Trail Alliance receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $794k on record.

Federal$794k
grants $794kcontracts $0
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$794k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Bigfoot Trail Alliance

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 10%Fundraising 5%

Governance

11
board members
0%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

0%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Bigfoot Trail Alliance: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Bigfoot Trail Alliance?
Bigfoot Trail Alliance (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $378,390 to it, the largest being S H COWELL FOUNDATION ($267,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Bigfoot Trail Alliance have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $378,390 in grants to Bigfoot Trail Alliance, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Bigfoot Trail Alliance?
S H COWELL FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $267,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Bigfoot Trail Alliance find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Bigfoot Trail Alliance →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing