Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

St Joseph Hospital of Eureka

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$1.6M
Granted FY2018
25
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$616k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.

Health$5.4MHuman Services$234kHousing & Shelter$231kFood & Nutrition$93kEnvironment$83kPhilanthropy$74kReligion$52kCommunity Improvement$51kOther$0
02FY2018 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $318k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$615,700
NORTH COAST HEALTH IMPROVEMENT$533,333
BETTY KWAN CHINN HOMELESS FOUNDATION$90,000
HUMBOLDT AREA FOUNDATION$39,000
FOOD FOR PEOPLE$25,000
McKinleyville Community Collaborative$20,000
EUREKA RESCUE MISSION$20,000
ARCATA HOUSE PARTNERSHIP$20,000
HUMBOLDT SENIOR RESOUCRE CENTER$20,000
REDWOOD REGIONAL ECONOMIC COMMISSION$18,400
KLAMATH TRINITY RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT$17,920
MERCYS HAVEN$15,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$15,000
REDWOOD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$15,000
FORTUNA SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WARRIOR INSTITUTE: $11k → 18%REDWOOD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $50k → 18%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $36k → 18%REDWOOD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $15k → 18%CHANGING TIDES FAMILY SERVICES: $9k → 18%CHANGING TIDES FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.4M · 18 repeat orgs$783k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
8

Total granted

$5.4M
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
+57%

Still filing today

89%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $593k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BK
    BETTY KWAN CHINN HOMELESS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $152k · revenue +198%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR PEOPLE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $68k · revenue +106%
  • RC
    Redwood Community Action Agency
    2× · 2017–2018 · $65k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +57%
  • IP
    INK PEOPLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +245%
  • RT
    REDWOOD TEEN CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Ford Street Project

The Ford Street Project provides shelter, housing, substance abuse treatment and employment services to the homeless, addicted, and disabled in Mendocino County.

Health
2
Willits Community Services Inc

The primary goal of Willits Community Services is to provide temporary assistance services to families and individuals in crisis. WCS also provides referrals to other community or regional resources and gives assistance to clients in…

Human Services
3
Redwood Coast Humane Society

Prevention of pet abuse, neglect, and over-population by providing temporary and permanent homes for abandoned cats and dogs and providing neutering and spaying services for these animals.

Animals
4
Manzanita Services Inc

Business closed waiting for dissolution from California

Health
5
Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families

Hands of Hope works to enhance the quality of life in the Yuba-Sutter area by: Providing core support services to the homeless; Reintegrating the homeless within our community; Engaging the community to respond to the challenge of…

Housing & Shelter
6
Redwoods Rural Health Center Inc

Redwoods Rural Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that provides primary, preventative healthcare services to all people without regard to social or economic status.

Health
7
Youth for Change

Youth For Change (YFC) mission is to enhance the well being of children, families, individuals, and communities.

Human Services
8
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
9
Mendocino Coast Hospitality Center

Provide basic shelter services to the community's poor, those without food and shelter.

—
10
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
11
Humboldt County Animal Shelter Inc

The Organization's mission is to provide temporary sanctuary and shelter for unwanted, lost and neglected animals, to promote the humane care and treatment of dogs and cats through education, and to actively advocate pet popluation control.

Animals
12
Mountain High Recovery Center

Mountain High Recovery Center is a substance use treatment facility whose mission is to provide local, quality, and affordable recovery services to individuals and families in the South Lake Tahoe, CA community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Redwood Community Action Agency and the most unlike its peers is Willow Creek Youth Partnership Inc Dream Quest. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $4,734,400 · HealthST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONNORTH COAST HEALTH IMPROVEMENT AND INFORMATION NETWORK INC — $533,333 · HealthNORTH COAST HEALTH IMPROVEMENT AND INFORMATION NETWORK INC+3 more — $137,225 · HealthHumboldt Senior Resource Center — $61,250 · OtherKlamath Trinity Resource Conservation District — $32,920 · OtherHUMBOLDT ALCOHOL REC TRMT PRG — $25,000 · OtherHealy Senior Center of Southern Humboldt Inc — $21,519 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of the Redwoods — $20,000 · OtherREDWOOD REGIONAL ECONOMIC COMMISSION — $18,400 · OtherNEW LIFE & RESPITE HOUSING — $13,600 · OtherWIYOT TRIBE — $12,000 · OtherINK PEOPLE INC — $21,800 · OtherCourt Appointed Special Advocate of Humboldt — $20,000 · OtherREDWOOD TEEN CHALLENGE — $15,000 · OtherWestside Community Improvement Assn — $12,310 · Other+4 more — $35,300 · OtherBETTY KWAN CHINN HOMELESS FOUNDATION — $152,000 · Housing & ShelterEUREKA RESCUE MISSION — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterARCATA HOUSE PARTNERSHIP — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterMERCYS HAVEN — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterRedwood Community Action Agency — $65,070 · Human ServicesParticular Council of the Redwood Region of the Society of St Vincent de Paul — $51,250 · Human ServicesChanging Tides Family Services — $14,802 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $11,179 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR PEOPLE INC — $68,277 · Food & NutritionNORTH COAST GROWERS ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · Food & NutritionHUMBOLDT AREA FOUNDATION — $74,439 · PhilanthropyMCKINLEYVILLE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE — $34,000 · Community Improvement
Health$5,404,958Other$309,099Housing & Shelter$232,000Human Services$142,301Food & Nutrition$93,277Philanthropy$74,439Community Improvement$34,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $4,734,400 over 2y, 12% of budgetBETTY KWAN CHINN HOMELESS FOUNDATION — $152,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMBOLDT AREA FOUNDATION — $74,439 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD FOR PEOPLE INC — $68,277 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHumboldt Senior Resource Center — $61,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetParticular Council of the Redwood Region of the Society of St Vincent de Paul — $51,250 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetEUREKA RESCUE MISSION — $35,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMCKINLEYVILLE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE — $34,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetARCATA HOUSE PARTNERSHIP — $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetNORTH COAST GROWERS ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetINK PEOPLE INC — $21,800 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocate of Humboldt — $20,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of the Redwoods — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetREDWOOD TEEN CHALLENGE — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetChanging Tides Family Services — $14,802 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWestside Community Improvement Assn — $12,310 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $11,179 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEEL RIVER VALLEY MULTI-GENERATIONAL CENTER INC — $10,200 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetALCOHOLDRUG CARE SERVICES INC DBA WATERFRONT RECOVERY SERVICES — $7,225 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWillow Creek Youth Partnership Inc Dream Quest — $5,100 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Humboldt Area Foundat…Patricia D & William …Christine & Jalmer Be…Humboldt Health Found…Sisters of St Joseph …St Joseph Health Syst…Coast Central Credit …The Schmidbauer Famil…The California Wellne…Andree Wagner Peace T…The PG&E Corporation …California Foundation…
Humboldt Area FoundationCA52.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Humboldt Area Foundation · Patricia D & William B Smullin Foundation · Christine & Jalmer Berg Foundation · Humboldt Health Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · St Joseph Health System Foundation · Coast Central Credit Union · The Schmidbauer Family Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Andree Wagner Peace Trust UTD 121289 · The PG&E Corporation Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Joseph Hospital of Eureka funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2019) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home