· Public charity
Coast Central Credit Union
COAST CENTRAL CREDIT UNION's mission is to be the primary financial institution for members by providing high quality financial services at competitively favorable rates consistent with maintaining financial strength.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $185,985 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $350,471 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $164,486 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $153k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DREAMQUEST WILLOW CREEK YOUTH PARTNERSHIP | $45,000 |
| FOOD FOR PEOPLE | $25,000 |
| TRINITY ALPS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISCTRICT | $21,000 |
| AFFORDABLE HOMELESS HOUSING ALTERNATIVES | $15,000 |
| ALDERPOINT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT | $15,000 |
| DEL NORTE FAIRGROUNDS | $12,000 |
| HUMBOLDT BRIDGES TO SUCCESS | $10,335 |
| NATION'S FINEST | $10,000 |
| WILLOW CREEK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT | $8,050 |
| HEALTHSPORT | $6,880 |
| MATTOLE VALLEY RESOURCE CENTER | $6,500 |
| MCKINLEYVILLE YOUTH FOOTBALL & CHEER | $6,000 |
| NORTH COAST RAPE CRISIS TEAM | $5,220 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Coast Central Credit Union’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 93% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWillow Creek Youth Partnership Inc Dream Quest3× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +490%
- IPINK PEOPLE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +76%
- NCNORTHERN CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY BLOOD BANK2× · 2020–2022 · $22k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- AHARCATA HOUSE PARTNERSHIPgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +850%
- CSCalifornia State Grange Foundationone grant, 2023 · $25k · 28% of their budget
- FRFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF THE REDWOODSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +78%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organization's mission is to provide temporary sanctuary and shelter for unwanted, lost and neglected animals, to promote the humane care and treatment of dogs and cats through education, and to actively advocate pet popluation control.
Prevention of pet abuse, neglect, and over-population by providing temporary and permanent homes for abandoned cats and dogs and providing neutering and spaying services for these animals.
Northern California Sled Dog Rescue (NORSLED) is an all volunteer non-profit group dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating, fostering and finding new homes for unwanted, abused and abandoned siberian huskies, alaskan malamutes, samoyeds and…
Fire suppression, rescue and emergency medical first responders in this remote, rural coastal area. sonoma county service area #25.
Activities within trinity, humboldt, del norte county, siskiyou and mendocino counties and to recruit and administer financial capital for such purposes.
Protect the people of amador county and their property from the effects of catastrophic fires through education, cooperation, innovation and action
Promote fire safety by providing information, education, support incentives and projects that encourage fire safety in a service area in eastern Fresno and Tulare counties.
Care for shelter animals, provide public with free spay/neuter services, educational outreach.
CSERC protects water, wildlife, and wild places of the Northern Yosemite region.
Historical preservation
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ink People Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pacific Union School Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Willow Creek Youth Partnership Inc Dream Quest ↗
- Who funds AFFORDABLE HOMELESS HOUSING ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds EUREKA RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds FORTUNA SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ARCATA HOUSE PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds California State Grange Foundation ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF THE REDWOODS ↗
- Who funds INK PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds Companion Animal Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY BLOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SEQUOIA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DEL NORTE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds CLARKE HISTORICAL MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF HUMBOLDT INC ↗
- Who funds Veterans of Forgein Wars Post 9561 ↗
- Who funds TRINITY COUNTY LIFE SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds Humboldt Senior Resource Center ↗
- Who funds Arcata Vol Firefighters Assn Inc ↗
- Who funds Briceland Volunteer Fire Department ↗
- Who funds 2-1-1 Humboldt Information and Resource Center ↗
- Who funds Humboldt Youth Soccer League Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN TRINITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds Bird Ally X ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Humboldt Area Foundation · Christine & Jalmer Berg Foundation · Humboldt Health Foundation · Patricia D & William B Smullin Foundation · Andree Wagner Peace Trust UTD 121289 · St Joseph Hospital of Eureka · The Schmidbauer Family Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · California Fire Foundation · The Bob and Jennie Canevari Foundation Inc · The PG&E Corporation Foundation · The Mel and Grace McLean Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Coast Central Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Coast Central Credit Union?
Find your warmest path to Coast Central Credit Union through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.