Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER

HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $93,218 to it, the largest being HUMBOLDT AREA FOUNDATION ($67,400). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 73% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$279k
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$93k
Grants received
$369k
Net assets
3/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 21%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($168k) Expenses 100 ($167k) Net assets 100 ($365k)2018 Revenue 95 ($159k) Expenses 96 ($160k) Net assets 99 ($362k)2022 Revenue 143 ($240k) Expenses 112 ($188k) Net assets 123 ($448k)2023 Revenue 164 ($276k) Expenses 181 ($303k) Net assets 114 ($416k)2024 Revenue 164 ($276k) Expenses 207 ($346k) Net assets 110 ($402k)2025 Revenue 166 ($279k) Expenses 180 ($301k) Net assets 101 ($369k)
201720182022202320242025
Revenue (166)Expenses (180)Net assets (101)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 41% · 2023 45% · 2024 36% · 2025 36%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$988
17
$1k
18
$52k
22
$28k
23
$69k
24
$22k
25
10
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $8k → $50k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
2
2
2
1

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)73% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER.

72%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 97% · 2022 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

73% of HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $26k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside California, across 1 state.

VA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $68k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 2%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

0%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER?
HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $93,218 to it, the largest being HUMBOLDT AREA FOUNDATION ($67,400). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 73% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $93,218 in grants to HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER?
HUMBOLDT AREA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $67,400 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like HAYFORK SENIOR NUTRITION CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing