· Private foundation
Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k165 grants · $485k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $568k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $196k
- $250k+4 grants · $20M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLICK FAMILY HOUSING FOUNDATION | $17,510,000 |
| TEENWORKS INC | $1,714,500 |
| INDIANAPOLIS CULTURAL TRAIL INC | $552,100 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC | $267,274 |
| GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC | $76,000 |
| AMERICAN CABARET THEATRE INC | $65,000 |
| INDIANA REPERTORY THEATRE | $55,000 |
| PROVIDENCE CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL | $36,000 |
| SECOND HELPINGS INC | $30,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE GREATER NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA KY INC | $29,000 |
| SEEDS OF CARING | $27,500 |
| THE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC | $25,000 |
| BUTLER UNIVERSITY | $21,000 |
| SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY THEATRE | $20,000 |
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $19,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $398k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
188 repeat relationships — 151 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 52 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITEENWORKS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $8.2M · revenue +34% · 60% of their budget
- ICINDIANAPOLIS CULTURAL TRAIL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $741k · revenue +687%
- IRIndiana Repertory Theatre Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $175k · revenue +20%
Funded once
FILM INDEPENDENTone grant, 2024 · $65k · revenue 0%- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INCone grant, 2022 · $50k
- ALA LONGER TABLE INCone grant, 2023 · $28k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Trusted journalism, inspiring stories and lifelong learning.
To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…
The international center is a catalyst to inform, convene, and connect public, private, and civic global objectives in indiana. for nearly half a century, the international center has served as a guide to the world's cultural landscape and…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocates Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bloomington Classical Guitar Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 54% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
278 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 278 of the 351 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEENWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS CULTURAL TRAIL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CABARET THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Indiana Repertory Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC ↗
- Who funds Newfields Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds INDIANA SPORTS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Eskenazi Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds Butler University ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF CARING ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds LINK OBSERVATORY AND SPACE SCIENCE CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds Healthy MothersHealthy Babies Coalition of Palm Beach County Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA WOMEN IN NEED FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds WFYI Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS INDIANAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds South Orange County Community Theatre ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tampa Hillsborough Homeless Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
- The Spring of Tampa Bay Inc — 33% of income from government
- Champions for Children Inc — 14% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Venice Theatre Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.