· Private foundation
Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $93k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $451k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE DAYTON FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY | $40,000 |
| FOODBANK INC | $36,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $30,000 |
| MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CHILDRENS DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $20,000 |
| MERCY MANOR INC | $20,000 |
| OH TASTE | $20,000 |
| ADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY | $20,000 |
| THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR COMMUNITY | $15,000 |
| PRESCHOOL PROMISE INC | $15,000 |
| WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| HOUSE OF BREAD | $15,000 |
| SENIOR RESOURCE CONNECTION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $303k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
50 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FOODBANK INC5× · 2020–2024 · $161k · revenue +40%
- MVMIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $142k · revenue +28%
- AFADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- GNGOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSEone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +20%
- DSDAYTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +52%
- ECENGINEERS CLUB OF DAYTONone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.
To promote community by nuturing children and empowering familites in a christian environment by providing childcare services and supportive services for families.
YWCA Dayton is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
The dayton art institute is committed to enriching the community by creating meaningful experiences with art that are available to all.
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…
Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.
Greater dayton union cooperative initiative inc incubates cooperative businesses to create and retain good jobs in our region, building a local economy that works for all.
The center will use its resources for information sharing and member assistance to incubate new entrepreneurs who are trying to establish a presence in the marketplace. the center will research, identify, teach and disseminate the critical…
The mission of the coalition is to recruit, expand and retain jobs in the dayton region. the coalition focuses on growing the 14-county dayton region and bolsters job creation and opportunity by supporting entrepreneurial activity,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodwill Easter Seals Miami Valley and the most unlike its peers is Therapeutic Riding Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE DAYTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR BASIC LEGAL EQUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds DAYBREAK INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF BREAD ↗
- Who funds THE BRUNNER LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Omega Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds Wesley Community Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Senior Resource Connection ↗
- Who funds BRIGID'S PATH INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL EASTER SEALS MIAMI VALLEY ↗
- Who funds MIAMI VALLEY MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds CRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS ↗
- Who funds DAYTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds ENGINEERS CLUB OF DAYTON ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WIDOWS HOME OF DAYTON OHIO ↗
- Who funds CLOTHES THAT WORK ↗
- Who funds VICTORIA THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT BLINDNESS ↗
- Who funds THE MUSE MACHINE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mathile Family Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · The CareSource Foundation · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · Frank M Tait Foundation · The Fred and Alice Wallace Charitable Memorial Foundation · The Berry Family Foundation · Levin Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.