· Public charity
Miami Valley Hospital
We care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $2,594,314 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,266,921 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,672,607 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $96k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIVE RIVERS HEALTH CENTERS | $1,944,799 |
| PREMIER COMMUNITY HEALTH | $322,921 |
| REACH OUT MONTGOMERY COUNTY | $101,063 |
| MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $49,473 |
| UVMC FOUNDATION | $31,955 |
| OTTERBEIN HOMES | $15,400 |
| TAFT MUSEUM OF ART | $11,550 |
| CHAMINADE JULIENNE | $11,550 |
| DAYTON FOUNDATION | $10,010 |
| UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON | $9,625 |
| ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $9,240 |
| GOODWILL EASTER SEALS | $8,085 |
| CRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS | $7,700 |
| MIAMI VALLEY MEALS | $7,700 |
| SC MINISTRY FOUNDATION | $7,123 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FRFIVE RIVERS HEALTH CENTERS8× · 2017–2024 · $26M · revenue +122%
- CDCITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION3× · 2018–2020 · $13M · revenue +315% · 64% of their budget
- HOHOSPICE OF DAYTON INC2× · 2017–2018 · $2.0M · revenue +56%
Funded once
- GVGDAHA VENTURES LLCone grant, 2020 · $2.5M
- COCITY OF DAYTONone grant, 2017 · $66k
- TUTHE UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER DAYTON AREAone grant, 2018 · $41k · revenue -49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…
The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.
Provide home or nursing home care for terminally ill patients and their families. provided education & support to fayette county and surrounding communities about qualify of life issues.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
The mission of hospice is to provide medical care, nursing care, pain relief, and emotional and spiritual support services to terminally ill patients and their families.
Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…
We will improve the health of the communities we serve with others who share our commitment to provide high-quality, cost-competitive healthcare services.
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.
The hospital council of northwest ohio is a member-driven organization that represents and advocates on behalf of its member hospitals and health systems, and provides collaborative opportunities to enhance the health status of the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Vincent De Paul Social Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women Walking West. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIVE RIVERS HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ONEFIFTEEN RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC ↗
- Who funds PREMIER COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE DAYTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAYTON FOUNDATION DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UVMC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOMEFULL ↗
- Who funds THE GALA OF HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OTTERBEIN HOMES ↗
- Who funds THE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds YWCA Dayton ↗
- Who funds ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds BRIGID'S PATH INC ↗
- Who funds MARY SCOTT NURSING ↗
- Who funds WARREN COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTH PARTNERS FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds University of Dayton ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL EASTER SEALS MIAMI VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Equitas Health Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ARBOGAST PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Big Hoopla Inc ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION - DAYTON ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER DAYTON AREA ↗
- Who funds WESTCARE OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF MIAMI COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds DECOLORES MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Miami County YMCA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Mathile Family Foundation · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · Levin Family Foundation · The CareSource Foundation · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · Good Samaritan Hospital · Synchrony Foundation · The Troy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Miami Valley Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.