Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Charitable trust

Comerica Charitable Trust

The COMERICA CHARITABLE TRUST is organized exclusively for the purpose of receiving and administering funds to make distributions to organizations which qualify as exempt organizations under internal revenue code 501(c)(3).

$21M
Granted FY2025still arriving
270
Grants FY2025still arriving
32
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$24MInternational$19MReligion$19MEducation$18MHealth$13MHuman Services$4.7MArts & Culture$3.1MAnimals$1.8MOther$0
02FY2025 · 270 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 270 grants below total $20,482,636 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $21,302,988 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $820,352 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $279k
  • $10k–50k181 grants · $3.5M
  • $50k–250k40 grants · $3.5M
  • $250k+10 grants · $13M
$20,000
Median grant
32
States reached
$87M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Society for Protestant Reformed Secondary Education$5,000,000
Global Impact$4,015,300
Chaldean Catholic Church of the USA$1,724,997
Bank of America Charitable Gift Fund$572,661
The Heritage Foundation$450,000
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund$344,957
Campbell Hall-Episcopal$320,000
Watertown Area Community Foundation$300,000
Fellowship of Catholic University-FOCUS$250,000
Geneva Camp & Retreat Center$250,000
BIG Love Cancer Care Services$200,000
Saint Vincent de Paul Church$200,000
Mayo Clinic$160,000
Huron Intermediate School District$126,500
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$125,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Willow International: $40k → 10%Canine Companions for Independence: $25k → 7%MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES INC: $50k → 9%Project 4031: $25k → 11%HOUSTON PREGNANCY HELP CENTER INC: $50k → 16%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $75k → 8%CALDWELL HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE INC: $25k → 16%BADDOUR CENTER INC: $25k → 19%PINE STREET INN: $40k → 16%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $63k → 8%GEORGIA CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY INC: $55k → 14%CROTCHED MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $40k → 7%World Orphan Fund Inc: $63k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $50k → 12%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $25k → 9%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $55k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $50k → 12%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $250k → 10%WORLD ORPHAN FUND INC: $37k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $25k → 12%Leader Dogs for the Blind: $1.3M → 8%Free Bikes 4 Kidz: $65k → 11%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $50k → 8%ST JOSEPH'S HOME FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 14%Free Bikes 4 Kidz: $83k → 11%FREE BIKES 4 KIDZ: $25k → 11%DEVICES 4 THE DISABLED: $50k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $25k → 14%DEVICES 4 THE DISABLED: $50k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $25k → 14%DEVICES 4 THE DISABLED: $40k → 14%Para Los Ninos: $25k → 14%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $73k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 14%Buckner Children and Family Services: $50k → 14%American National Red Cross: $98k → 9%BEAR BE A RESOURCE FOR CPS KIDS: $25k → 16%FREE BIKES 4 KIDZ: $36k → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $70k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $43k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 14%Sharefest Community Development Inc: $53k → 14%SHAREFEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $30k → 14%GOLD HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $250k → 14%Amara: $55k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $26k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $67k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$40M · 313 repeat orgs$23M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

313 repeat relationships — 164 still active in FY2025, 149 since wound down; 94 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

313
296

Total granted

$40M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+14%

Still filing today

73%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DZ
    DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1.3M · revenue +39%
  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $751k · revenue +33%
  • EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $486k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLINDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.3M · revenue +26%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.3M · revenue +89%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGANgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.3M · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
5
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
10
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsJewish Community Organizati…Christian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support ServicesChristian Youth CampsPolicy Research and AdvocacyAnimal Rescue and ShelterSenior Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsLocal History MuseumsPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Environmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesDomestic Violence ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsMilitary Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Construc…Community Arts CentersLgbtq+ Community SupportFaith-Based Social ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Local Food System Organizat…Addiction Recovery ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsDance Arts OrganizationsYouth Development ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%38%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%4/733
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,818,832

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

553 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 553 of the 745 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
91
Early backer (in before they grew)
544/553
Grantees still filing
349/553
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE AMERICAN FUND FOR CHARITIES — $4,174,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN FUND FOR CHARITIESCHALDEAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA — $3,938,997 · OtherCHALDEAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE UNITE…FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $4,128,596 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT …DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,311,637 · Other+92 more — $18,288,797 · Other+92 moreAMERICAN GIFT FUND — $3,582,862 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN GIFT FUNDMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $3,175,088 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL I…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $3,060,798 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABL…WATERTOWN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,877,000 · PhilanthropyWATERTOWN AREA COMMUNIT…NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $1,834,356 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC …Jackson Community Foundation — $1,453,906 · PhilanthropyJackson Community Found…THE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST — $1,417,912 · PhilanthropyTHE US CHARITABLE GIFT …Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $867,501 · Philanthropy+13 more — $2,677,612 · Philanthropy+13 moreGlobal Impact — $12,037,950 · InternationalGlobal Impact+7 more — $1,462,900 · International+7 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $2,500,000 · EducationTHE BOARD O…OLIVET COLLEGE — $1,304,121 · EducationOLIVET COLL…EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $486,000 · EducationWilliams College — $468,000 · EducationALVERNO COLLEGE — $446,600 · Education+27 more — $4,482,515 · Education+27 moreMAYO CLINIC — $1,984,121 · HealthMAYO CLINI…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $1,304,121 · HealthMEMORIAL S…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $1,304,121 · HealthPLANNED PA…NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC — $800,000 · HealthNCH HEALTH…RIVKIN CENTER FOR OVARIAN CANCER — $505,000 · HealthRIVKIN CEN…NEXT FOR AUTISM INC — $400,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $340,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $326,200 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $300,000 · HealthTREEHOUSE INC — $291,398 · Health+9 more — $1,157,971 · Health+9 moreLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $1,304,371 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC — $1,304,121 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $485,500 · Human ServicesBIG LOVE CANCER CARE SERVICES — $465,000 · Human ServicesThe World Orphan Fund Inc — $292,500 · Human ServicesAMARA — $255,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF THE ROCKIES — $254,375 · Human ServicesGOLD HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesTHE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Human ServicesFREE BIKES 4 KIDZ MN — $241,500 · Human Services+8 more — $972,544 · Human ServicesSOCIETY FOR PROTESTANT REFORMED SECONDARY EDUCATION — $5,000,000 · ReligionGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $340,000 · ReligionCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $316,000 · Religion+3 more — $363,000 · Religion
Other$31,842,027Philanthropy$19,947,035International$13,500,850Education$9,687,236Health$8,712,932Human Services$6,074,911Religion$6,019,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGlobal Impact — $12,037,950 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR PROTESTANT REFORMED SECONDARY EDUCATION — $5,000,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FUND FOR CHARITIES — $4,174,000 over 2y, 78% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $4,128,596 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN GIFT FUND — $3,582,862 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $3,175,088 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $3,060,798 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $2,500,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $1,984,121 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATERTOWN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,877,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $1,834,356 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJackson Community Foundation — $1,453,906 over 9y, 38% of budgetTHE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST — $1,417,912 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,311,637 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $1,304,371 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $1,304,121 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $1,304,121 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetOLIVET COLLEGE — $1,304,121 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC — $1,304,121 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $867,501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC — $800,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $751,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $516,825 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVKIN CENTER FOR OVARIAN CANCER — $505,000 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $486,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $485,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College — $468,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG LOVE CANCER CARE SERVICES — $465,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetALVERNO COLLEGE — $446,600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNEXT FOR AUTISM INC — $400,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC — $378,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $370,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $340,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $340,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $326,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame — $322,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $320,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $316,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetThe Foundation for Excellence in Education DBA Childrens Community Schoo — $315,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $310,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College — $303,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY — $300,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetThe World Orphan Fund Inc — $292,500 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetTREEHOUSE INC — $291,398 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetGIVE2ASIA — $289,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GRAND RAPIDS — $283,500 over 1y, 16% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Global Impact ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR PROTESTANT REFORMED SECONDARY EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FUND FOR CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds WATERTOWN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Jackson Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds OLIVET COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
  • Who funds GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVKIN CENTER FOR OVARIAN CANCER ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds BIG LOVE CANCER CARE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ALVERNO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEXT FOR AUTISM INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Gift Annuity…Grand Rapids Communit…Grousemont FoundationThe Gerber FoundationCommunity Foundation …Michigan College Acce…Dte Energy FoundationAmerican Gift FundGrand Haven Area Comm…University of Notre D…Bny Mellon Charitable…Catholic Foundation o…
National Gift Annuity FoundationFL28.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Gift Annuity Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · The Gerber Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Michigan College Access Network · Dte Energy Foundation · American Gift Fund · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · Catholic Foundation of Michigan

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Comerica Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Ada Forsyth Institute Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Steps to Success Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Children's Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation — 1% of income from government
  • Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Rollins College — 0% of income from government
  • Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Naples Community Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
  • Williams College — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 745 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines