· Private foundation
Grace S and W Linton Nelson Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k30 grants · $125k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $575k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARKESBURG POINT YOUTH CENTER | $60,000 |
| THE GARAGE COMMUNITY AND YOUTH CENT | $50,000 |
| THE GARAGE COMMUNITY AND YOUTH CENT | $25,000 |
| WE REIGN INC | $20,000 |
| ORDINARIE HEROES | $20,000 |
| YOUTH ART & SELF-EMPOWERMENT PROJEC | $20,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED | $20,000 |
| 12 | $20,000 |
| LIFT EVERY VOICE PHILLY | $20,000 |
| COLLECTIVE CLIMB | $20,000 |
| CODED BY KIDS | $20,000 |
| WE LOVE PHILLY | $20,000 |
| CHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER | $20,000 |
| NEED IN DEED | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $857k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
75 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CYCASA YOUTH ADVOCATES INC7× · 2017–2023 · $345k · revenue +177%
- MCMONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT8× · 2017–2024 · $275k · revenue +88%
- RTROCK TO THE FUTURE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $268k · revenue +265%
Funded once
- TVTHRIVE VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT CO UJIMA DEVELOPERS LLCone grant, 2021 · $100k
- HPHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +474%
- CNCENTRO NUEAVO CREACIONone grant, 2017 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Philadelphia youth network (pyn) equips young people to build lifelong skills, pursue meaningful careers, and embrace change with confidence - so they can thrive in the workforce, experience economic mobility, and strengthen their…
To re-engage out-of-school youth with alternative educational programs and job connections, life skills training,counseling, media and technology skills
Friends of the children philadelphia has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…
Summary
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
To empower young adults (17-20 year-olds) to develop skills and connect to opportunities by fostering an environment of love, support, and respect for their whole person. students graduate high school and successfully transition to college…
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
Horizons Greater Philadelphia advances educational equity by building long-term partnerships with students, families, communities, and schools to create experiences outside of school that inspire the joy of learning.
The mission of the philadelphia education fund (pef) is to create equitable access to opportunities for students by providing resources and expertise that build paths to college and career success. pef focuses on philadelphia public school…
The mission of philadelphia youth sports collaborative (pysc) is to dramatically enhance the capacity of youth-serving organizations in philadelphia to provide high quality, sports-based youth development programs to children in every…
Cultivating the next generation of progressive leaders across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project 440 Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CASA YOUTH ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY CHILD ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ROCK TO THE FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNGMOMS ↗
- Who funds COATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE PARKESBURG POINT ↗
- Who funds Healthy NewsWorks ↗
- Who funds THE GARAGE COMMUNITY & YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds AFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES PARTNERSHIPS ↗
- Who funds NORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIRLS FIRST ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds SQUASHSMARTS INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS RUN PHILLY STYLE ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD BIKE WORKS ↗
- Who funds Achieve Now ↗
- Who funds ONE HOUSE AT A TIME INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds TALLER PUERTORRIQUENO INC ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY WRITERS ↗
- Who funds WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds Starfinder Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds Philadelphia City Rowing Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds Episcopal Academy ↗
- Who funds CENTRO NUEVA CREACION NEW CREATION COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO ↗
- Who funds TRELLIS FOR TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC ↗
- Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FUTURES INC ↗
- Who funds THE MONKEY AND THE ELEPHANT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Claneil Foundation Inc · Connelly Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The Allen Hilles Fund · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Independence Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Grace S and W Linton Nelson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Grace S and W Linton Nelson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Grace S and W Linton Nelson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.