How much did CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

displaced personsemergency responsemennoniteharvest foodlatin

2020

committee refugeeschristrefugees immigrantsconferencebreadinterfaithrelief

2021

parishladyrefugeesdioceseemergency responseharvest foodgreensboro

2022

presbyterianrefugee immigrantgroupharrisburgecumenicalmennonitelancaster

2023

global reliefrefugee immigrantpresbyterianneighborhoodharrisburgemergency responseecumenical

2024

othersneighborhoodrefugee immigrantfood pantryhoperefugee immigrationlancaster

2025

accesshousingeconomicfeedhealthywelcomingadvocate

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 96 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k38 grants · $259k
$10k–50k30 grants · $551k
$50k–250k4 grants · $623k
$250k+24 grants · $57M

$12,158

Median grant

States reached

$81M

Total assets

Largest grants

INTEGRATED REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES(IRIS)$6,851,865
KENTUCKY REFUGEE MINISTRIES$5,852,739
OPENING DOORS INC$5,740,521
NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS$4,993,116
EXODUS REFUGEE IMMIGRATION PROGRAM$4,740,632
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICE (PARA)$4,711,780
COMMUNITY REFUGEE IMMIGRATION SERVICES(CRIS)$4,237,710
REFUGEEONE$3,734,601
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICE OF NEBRASKA$3,289,034
JOURNEYS END RESETTLEMENT SERVICES$2,398,562
YOUTH CO-OP INC$2,024,728
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC$1,572,927
ASCENTRIA COMMUNITY SERVICES$1,444,655
BAKERRIPLEY$1,255,620
CACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTION(CRIC)$825,408

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $20.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$185M · 149 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

149 repeat relationships — 80 still active in FY2024, 69 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

149

120

Total granted

$185M

$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%

+41%

Still filing today

46%

31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $822k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesFood & NutritionReligionInternationalCivil RightsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

KR
KENTUCKY REFUGEE MINISTRIES
7× · 2018–2024 · $19M · revenue +220% · 31% of their budget
OD
OPENING DOORS INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $18M · revenue +198% · 52% of their budget
NA
NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS
7× · 2018–2024 · $14M · revenue +176% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

AC
ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE
one grant, 2023 · $957k · revenue +9%
IW
INTERFAITH WORKS OF CENTRAL NEW YORKgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $164k · revenue +345%
CF
CATHOLIC FAMILY CENTER
one grant, 2018 · $155k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Interfaith Food Ministry Nevada County

A community where no one should feel the hurt of hunger. Interfaith Food Ministry feeds the hungry and works to reduce food insecurity in Nevada County. We help to sustain health, human dignity and the opportunity for individuals to…

Food & Nutrition

Restoration Bridge International Inc

Restoration Bridge International endeavors to help supply people in need with food until they no longer need assistance.

Human Services

Coralville Community Food Pantry

The Coralville Community Food Pantry is an anti-hunger nonprofit organization providing critical and innovative food assistance services to the greater Coralville community.

Food & Nutrition

Community Food Bank Inc

We change lives in the communities we serve by feeding the hungry today and building a healthy, hunger-free tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition

Interchurch Organization Inc

Soup kitchen serves a daily hot meal to homeless and low income. provides a safe environment in which to satisfy our client's needs for daily nutrition, support, healthy guidance, and social interaction. this positive atmosphere enhances…

Religion

Help Me Help You

Our mission is to uplift homeless and low-income families and individuals by increasing access to food public benefits, and economic security.

—

Food for People Inc

Food for people is a designated food bank committed to providing food for those in need.

Food & Nutrition

Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services

Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc

Together, we nourish our neighbors and improve their lives one meal at a time.

Food & Nutrition

Inter-Faith Food Shuttle

To feed our neighbors, teach self- sufficiency and grow healthy foods through innovative, collaborative approaches to ending hunger.

Human Services

Food Rescue Us Inc

Coordinate the transfer of excess donated food from food service organizations to community organizations who serve the food-insecure.

Food & Nutrition

Christians Reaching Out to Society Inc

To feed the hungry; food recovery; work with community partners to combat food insecurity.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action House and the most unlike its peers is Nourish Up. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.5%1/197

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,368

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

154 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

152/154

Grantees still filing

123/154

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$109,830,321Religion$29,538,323Human Services$21,831,163Community Improvement$18,892,900Employment$5,591,850International$2,258,821Public Safety & Disaster$1,446,709

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Rescue Committee IncNY25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Rescue Committee Inc · Save The Children Federation Inc · The Shapiro Foundation · Hispanics in Philanthropy · United Way of Greater Houston · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Feeding America · US Committee for Refugees And · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc · Farmlink Project · Houston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

8get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GOD IS GOOD FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 10.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 271038585 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GOD IS GOOD FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Church World Service Inc?

Find your warmest path to Church World Service Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

154 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Church World Service Inc?

More from the funding graph

CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

154 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Church World Service Inc?

More from the funding graph