· Public charity
Houston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab
The mission of the Collaborative is to create a coordinated network of effective and efficient services to assist low-income immigrants access to the information and legal representation that allows them to make choices in their own best interest.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $49k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $531k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Boat People SOS Inc | $170,514 |
| Baylor College of Medicine | $60,000 |
| Epiphany Community Health | $60,000 |
| Memorial AssistanceMinistries | $60,000 |
| Interfaith Ministries Houston | $60,000 |
| Living Hope Wheelchair Assoc | $60,000 |
| Bonding Against Adversity | $60,000 |
| Houston Volunteer Lawyers | $26,050 |
| Catholic Charities GalvHstn | $22,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBakerRipley6× · 2018–2023 · $764k · revenue +86%
- JFJustice For All Immigrants5× · 2018–2024 · $573k · revenue +198%
- GIGalveston-Houston Immigrant Representation Project5× · 2021–2025 · $515k · revenue ×17
Funded once
- HRHUMAN RIGHTS FIRSTone grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -1%
- IJIMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $90k · revenue +170%
- OBOlive Branch-Muslim Family Servicesone grant, 2020 · $69k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…
Houston Legal Aid Center protects and advances the rights of the poor through the poor through the provision of pro bono or reduced cost legal services while also addressing the underlying spiritual and relational issues affecting…
The mission of the Collaborative is to create a coordinated network of effective and efficient services to assist low-income immigrants access to the information and legal representation that allows them to make choices in their own best…
The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.
Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…
Immigration Legal Services and Advocacy (ISLA) provides direct representation to indigent detained immigrants throughout Louisiana on a pro bono basis and under a universal representation model. ISLA provides information to the public to…
In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.
The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.
Ensuring greater access to high-quality low-cost immigration legal services across the United States through local immigrant connection sites across the country. Our sites based in both rural and urban areas are established in…
The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…
As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.
Legal, immigration and community organizing
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services and the most unlike its peers is Organization of Chinese Americans of Greater Houston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS ↗
- Who funds BakerRipley ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area ↗
- Who funds Justice For All Immigrants ↗
- Who funds Galveston-Houston Immigrant Representation Project ↗
- Who funds Living Hope Wheelchair Association ↗
- Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds EPIPHANY COMMUNITY HEALTH OUTREACH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW HOUSTON INC ↗
- Who funds Texas Immigration Law Council ↗
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds Memorial Assistance Ministries ↗
- Who funds Daya Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BONDING AGAINST ADVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds BOAT PEOPLE S O S INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST ↗
- Who funds MI FAMILIA EN ACCION ↗
- Who funds AL-NOOR SOCIETY OF GREATER HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZATION OF CHINESE AMERICANS OF GREATER HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds FE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DE CORAZON ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR MULTICULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Olive Branch-Muslim Family Services ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds CHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds FAM INTENTIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE OF COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds BOAT PEOPLE SOS INC ↗
- Who funds EARL CARL INSTITUTE FOR LEGAL AND SOCIAL POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds Texas Low-Income Housing Information Service ↗
- Who funds My Connect Community ↗
- Who funds West Street Recovery ↗
- Who funds University of Houston Law Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Houston Endowment Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Houston · The Simmons Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Texas Access to Justice Foundation · Rockwell Fund Inc · Harvey R Houck Jr and Patricia W Houck Foundation Inc · The Methodist Hospital · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Marek Family Foundation · Church World Service Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Houston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Houston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab?
Find your warmest path to Houston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.