· Private foundation
The Shapiro Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k29 grants · $88k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $585k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+6 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT (IRAP) | $500,000 |
| ALIGHT | $405,429 |
| WORLD LEARNING | $363,258 |
| BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER | $350,000 |
| HORIZONS FOR THE HOMELESS CHILDREN | $303,537 |
| PATHWAYS INTERNATIONAL US | $295,000 |
| FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY | $200,000 |
| LABOR MOBILITY PARTNERSHIPS (LAMP) | $200,000 |
| THE NISKANEN CENTER | $178,591 |
| GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT INCUBATOR | $137,000 |
| REFUGE HOME PROJECT | $136,000 |
| ISRAAID | $125,940 |
| IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE (IFSI) | $124,000 |
| MALENGO INC | $105,000 |
| SOCIAL FINANCE | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $9.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
142 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 88 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Corporation8× · 2017–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +69%
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +88%- HFHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN7× · 2017–2023 · $2.6M · revenue +196%
Funded once
- UAUNITAFTEL AVIV FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $401k
- TATHE AMERICAN SERVICEone grant, 2023 · $400k
- JOJFS OTTAWA (BVOR FUND) VIA JEWISH FEDERATIONone grant, 2018 · $394k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…
USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Rpi's mission is to partner with local non-gov organizations and others to strengthen protection and self-reliance among refugees and internally displaced persons near conflict zones.
Ijc's mission is to recruit, train, and populate the immigration field with the highest quality legal advocates to create a new generation of leaders with a lifelong commitment to immigrant justice.
To enhance the protection of rights of the displaced worldwide by the provision of advice and assistance on the application of international law, the conducting of research on the interpretation and application of international law and the…
Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Bullpen Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
246 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 246 of the 386 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CHOOSE LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MILES4MIGRANTS ↗
- Who funds Social Finance Inc ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE HOME PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds ALIGHT ↗
- Who funds AIRBNBORG INC ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds Southern New Hampshire University ↗
- Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds DUET INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds KARAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BEAVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEPOINT INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP ↗
- Who funds HOME IS HERE NOLA ↗
- Who funds TENACITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE MATCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW PROFIT INC ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Fish Family Foundation · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · GivenGain Foundation USA · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · Lissy Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Shapiro Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge — 100% of income from government
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Health Law Advocates Inc — 52% of income from government
- Jewish Vocational Service Inc — 39% of income from government
- Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
- The Immigrant Learning Center Inc — 34% of income from government
- The Second Step Inc — 26% of income from government
- Uncornered Inc — 24% of income from government
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- HomeStart Inc — 20% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Social Finance Inc — 12% of income from government
- English for New Bostonians Inc — 11% of income from government
- Project Citizenship Inc — 10% of income from government
- Families First Parenting Program Inc — 10% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- De Novo Center for Justice and Healing — 9% of income from government
- Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc — 4% of income from government
- Masschallenge Inc — 3% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
- Hope and Comfort Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bentley University — 1% of income from government
- The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut Immigrant & Refugee Coalition — 0% of income from government
- Franciscan Hospital for Children — 0% of income from government
- Hebrew Senior Life Inc — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.