Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Cbre Foundation Inc

Cbre is committed to fulfilling its role as a responsible corporate citizen by supporting the philanthropic passions of our employees in the communities in which they live and work, including local community outreach and disaster-response programs.

$7.9M
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$3.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

60% of Cbre Foundation Inc’s FY2022 grant dollars went to American Online Giving Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 22 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Cbre Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $8M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

31
’18
26
’19
74
’20
7
’21
22
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2022.

Human Services$10MEnvironment$3.0MPhilanthropy$2.4MCivil Rights$2.2MFood & Nutrition$1.7MInternational$1.0MHousing & Shelter$847kHealth$715kOther$0
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
  • $250k+4 grants · $7.8M
$933,163
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC$3,850,000
Institute for Sustainable Communities$2,000,000
Rocky Mountain Institute$1,000,000
American Online Giving Foundation Inc$933,163
CHEFS SHOWCASE FOUNDATION$40,710
PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY$22,050
Angels for Change Inc$10,000
Positive Coaching Alliance$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $10.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOMEAID AMERICA INC: $15k → 10%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $6.0M → 12%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $3.9M → 11%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 9%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $22k → 7%OPERATION WARM INC: $10k → 6%Emergency Assistance Foundation Inc: $281k → 11%IN THE CITY FOR GOOD INC: $8k → 13%NORTH LIGHT COMMUNITY CENTER: $8k → 10%FRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $5k → 10%Helping Hand Home for Children Inc: $7k → 10%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $54k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
NV
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
DE
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 23 repeat orgs$9.4M to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 20 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
90

Total granted

$12M
$6.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+35%

Still filing today

91%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CHEF SHOWCASE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $164k · revenue +2%
  • HO
    Habitat of Humanity of Redwood River Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $112k · revenue +21%
  • TP
    THE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $49k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M · revenue -54%
  • NU
    NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M · revenue -65%
  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
7
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
8
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
9
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
10
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
11
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Realty Foundation of New York Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyFood Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesLocal Food System Organizat…Affordable Housing Developm…Youth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Senior Support ServicesSchool District FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Construc…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%54%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/136
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,429

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
122/125
Grantees still filing
89/125
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $10,130,911 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INCNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $1,086,295 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC+14 more — $459,776 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES — $2,000,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR S…DIRECT RELIEF — $1,000,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF+3 more — $111,308 · InternationalAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $2,194,928 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ON…+10 more — $193,166 · Philanthropy+10 moreRocky Mountain Institute — $1,000,000 · OtherRocky Mountain I…Chicago Cubs Charities — $300,000 · OtherChicago Cubs Cha…NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $207,638 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD…REBUILDING TOGETHER INC — $349,000 · OtherREBUILDING TOGET…Habitat of Humanity of Redwood River Inc — $112,379 · Other+69 more — $1,338,196 · Other+69 moreFeeding America — $1,000,025 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $54,063 · Food & Nutrition+13 more — $243,779 · Food & NutritionNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $1,091,295 · Civil RightsCHEF SHOWCASE FOUNDATION — $164,033 · HealthGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC — $63,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $57,960 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $54,063 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $54,063 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $45,627 · HealthGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $31,000 · HealthBOUNCE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $26,000 · Health+6 more — $48,664 · Health
Human Services$11,676,982International$3,111,308Philanthropy$2,388,094Other$3,307,213Food & Nutrition$1,297,867Civil Rights$1,091,295Health$544,410

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $10,130,911 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $2,194,928 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES — $2,000,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $1,091,295 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $1,086,295 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFeeding America — $1,000,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER INC — $349,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetChicago Cubs Charities — $300,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $207,638 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHEF SHOWCASE FOUNDATION — $164,033 over 5y, 16% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $143,385 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESPECT 90 FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $96,041 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC — $63,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $58,460 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $57,960 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $54,063 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY — $54,063 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING — $54,063 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $54,063 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF RHODE ISLAND INC — $54,063 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $54,063 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $54,063 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hamels Foundation Inc — $50,075 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetTHE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC — $49,425 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $45,627 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $37,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $35,392 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN HOUSING — $35,097 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER LAS VEGAS INNER CITY GAMES — $32,894 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $31,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $29,240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $28,738 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $28,738 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $28,190 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN EXPLORE INC — $27,196 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOUNCE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $26,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $24,154 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Warm Inc — $23,724 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY — $23,196 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKC MOTHERS IN CHARGE — $23,039 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $22,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWIND YOUTH SERVICES INC — $22,030 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Moody FoundationUnited Way WorldwideGreater Houston Commu…Austin Community Foun…Better Business BureauNelson Puett Foundati…Shield-Ayres Foundati…Topfer Family Foundat…The Powell FoundationCharles Schwab Founda…St David's FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …
The Moody FoundationTX20.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Moody Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Better Business Bureau · Nelson Puett Foundation · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · The Powell Foundation · Charles Schwab Foundation · St David's Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cbre Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Institute for Sustainable Communities — 100% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cbre Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cbre Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 136 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines