Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE

KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE (Missouri) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $568,186 to it, the largest being EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ($140,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$569k
Funders on record
24
Grants received
$568k
Net assets
$325k
9/24 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 65%
01What it does

What Kc Mothers in Charge does

Mission

Reduce violent crime through prevention, education, and intervention and to guide and support families of victims of homicides.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. In 2023, KC Mothers in Charge provided 81 visits to local homicide scenes, 39 home visits, provided 41 families with emergency assistance, and added 87 new clients. During the past ten years, a unique spectrum of services is provided to local families, including the following personalized vigils, one supoort group for non-fatal shootings and one for families that have encountered homicide, both held in-person, and individual guardians receive weekly phone calls from volunteers to personally check in with them. KC Mothers in Charge held two special events to raise awareness about anti-violence efferts, share how individuals can engage with KC Mothers in Charge, and educate the local community on other family resources and mechanisms for anti-violence engagement. Through regular communication with Kanas City Police Department and local agencies KC Mothers in Charge is able to provide immediate and ongoing services to families that have had loved ones killed by homicide.

    $244,601 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2023 Form 990. Program spending in total: $244,601.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($130k) Expenses 100 ($118k) Net assets 100 ($43k)2018 Revenue 208 ($271k) Expenses 124 ($146k) Net assets 386 ($168k)2019 Revenue 157 ($204k) Expenses 185 ($218k) Net assets 355 ($154k)2020 Revenue 189 ($246k) Expenses 160 ($189k) Net assets 487 ($212k)2021 Revenue 181 ($236k) Expenses 193 ($227k) Net assets 506 ($220k)2022 Revenue 297 ($387k) Expenses 249 ($293k) Net assets 721 ($313k)2023 Revenue 312 ($406k) Expenses 348 ($410k) Net assets 711 ($309k)2024 Revenue 437 ($569k) Expenses 435 ($512k) Net assets 748 ($325k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (437)Expenses (435)Net assets (748)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $50k to $173k (+246%).

$50k
$173k
$161k
$219k
$228k
$327k
$316k
$345k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 26% · 2019 46% · 2020 43% · 2021 58% · 2022 59% · 2023 71% · 2024 62%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

103% of KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,387 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$13k
’17
$124k
’18
−$14k
’19
$57k
’20
$8k
’21
$93k
’22
−$4k
’23
$56k
’24
5.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2018201920202021202220232024
Listed14111312141210
Joined·+0+8+2+4+2+2
No longer listed·363244
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 5 funders, grant income fell $36k → $5k.

3 of 24 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

76% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE.

25%
largest funder
54%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 33% · 2019 76% · 2020 48% · 2021 36% · 2022 52% · 2023 49% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

46% of KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 38% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE draws 55% of its grant income from funders outside Missouri, across 6 states in all.

MN
NY
MA
CA
MO
KS

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $41k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 5,688 youth development nonprofits its size.

Operating margin10% · above the median
Months of reserve5.5mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)23% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,688 youth development nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

59% of spending goes to programs.

Program 59%Management 34%Fundraising 6%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE?
KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE (Missouri) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $568,186 to it, the largest being EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ($140,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE have?
IRS filings report 24 organizations giving $568,186 in grants to KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE?
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC is the largest funder on record, with $140,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KC MOTHERS IN CHARGE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Kc Mothers in Charge →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 24 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing