Skip to content
Brindle Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Brindle Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
72
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.9MEducation$2.8MHuman Services$2.4MCivil Rights$857kCrime & Legal$696kPhilanthropy$470kEnvironment$436kArts & Culture$345kOther$0
02FY2024 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k59 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $165k
$21,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES (YEAR 2 OF TWO YEAR GRANT)$60,000
BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTHPLACE (YEAR 2 OF TWO YEAR GRANT)$55,000
CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENR CENTER SAN JUAN COLLEGE$50,000
LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER$47,000
SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$45,000
NM VOICES FOR CHILDREN$45,000
WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY$42,000
FOOD DEPOT$40,000
NM CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY (YEAR 1 OF TWO YEAR GRANT)$40,000
PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONNORTHERN ROOTS$40,000
SANTA FE BIRTH CENTER$35,000
YOUTH SHELTERS AND FAMILY SERVICES$35,000
Individual grant recipient$34,500
GERARD'S HOUSE$33,000
YOUTH HEARTLINE$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $90k → 18%CHILDREN IN NEED OF SERVICES: $15k → 20%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $90k → 18%JARDIN DE LOS NINO: $12k → 23%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $80k → 18%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $65k → 18%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $65k → 18%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 18%ENSUENOS Y LOS ANGELITOS: $20k → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT INC: $15k → 18%DREAMTREE PROJECT INC: $15k → 18%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $12k → 12%ENSUENOS Y LOS ANGELITOS: $10k → 18%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%REEL FATHERS: $13k → 12%REEL FATHERS: $12k → 12%REEL FATHERS: $10k → 12%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $23k → 12%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $18k → 12%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $15k → 12%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $15k → 12%NEW VISTAS: $20k → 14%CUIDANDO LOS NINOS: $20k → 14%NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $20k → 14%NEW VISTAS: $20k → 14%NEW VISTAS: $18k → 14%NEW VISTAS: $16k → 14%NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $15k → 14%NEW VISTAS: $15k → 14%NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $15k → 14%NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $15k → 14%NEW VISTAS: $15k → 14%CHILD COUNSELING CENTER AND PLAY THERAPY INSTITUTE: $18k → 12%CUIDANDO LOS NINOS: $10k → 14%FOOD DEPOT: $40k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $40k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $40k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $35k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $30k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $30k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $30k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $30k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
NV
CT
CA
CO
NM
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Brindle Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Brindle Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 100 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +83% for those funded once.

100 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

100
69

Total granted

$10M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+83%

Still filing today

69%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $655k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthCivil RightsArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $597k · revenue +52%
  • LC
    LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    6× · 2017–2022 · $440k · revenue +87%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • NM
    NEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW & POVERTY TWO YEAR GRANT
    one grant, 2022 · $85k
  • LF
    LANL FOUNDATION TWO YEAR GRANT
    one grant, 2022 · $85k
  • LC
    LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES TWO YEAR GRANT
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Mexico Perinatal Collaborative

The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…

—
2
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc

The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…

Civil Rights
3
Social and Emotional Learning Alliance for Nm

Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…

Education
4
New Mexico Association for Infant Mental Health

We promote and support healthy development and nurturing relationships for all infants and toddlers in New Mexico. NMAIMH works to facilitate, support, and encourage cooperation, coordination, collaboratin, and respect among those…

Health
5
New Mexico Center for Nursing Excellence

The mission of NMCNE is to advance and engage the nursing community to promote excellence and improve the health of all New Mexicans.

Health
6
New Mexico Childrens Foundation

Grants and expenses for programs serving the physical, mental, educational and social needs of children and their families.

Human Services
7
Law Access New Mexico

Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.

—
8
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
9
New Mexico Humanities Council

The new mexico humanities council (nmhc) supports and conducts innovative and imaginative programs throughout the state that lead to a greater understanding of, and motivate interest in, the richness of our human experience and heritage.…

—
10
New Mexico Ethics Watch

New mexico ethics watch is dedicated to promoting ethics and accountability in government and public life.

Public Benefit
11
La Clinica De Familia Inc

Lcdf empowers and enriches families, individuals and communities by providing quality medical, dental, behavioral health and educational services for people of all cultures.

Health
12
Dual Language Education of New Mexico

To champion equitable educational opportunities that honor and leverage the diverse linguistic and cultural assets of every learner. defender oportunidades educativas equitativas que honren y aprovechen los diversos recursos lingsticos y…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Center On Law and Poverty; the most unlike its peers is Commonsense Childbirth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 198 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
54
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/96
Grantees still filing
84/96
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER: $597,000 · OtherLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTERSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $268,000 · Other+133 more: $5,070,700 · Other+133 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $327,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NE…WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY FOUND: $285,000 · EducationWESTERN NEW MEXI…New Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children: $242,000 · EducationNew Mexico Assoc…SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $225,000 · EducationSANTA FE COMMUNI…REACH OUT AND READ INC: $187,500 · EducationREACH OUT AND RE…KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $110,500 · EducationKERES CHILDREN'S…SAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $97,000 · EducationSAN JUAN COLLEGE…New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $77,000 · Education+6 more: $175,500 · Education+6 moreLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $440,000 · Human ServicesLAS CUMBRES COM…THE FOOD DEPOT: $275,600 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOTYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $215,100 · Human ServicesYOUTH SHELTERS …Many Mothers Inc: $193,000 · Human ServicesMany Mothers In…NEW VISTAS: $103,500 · Human ServicesNEW VISTASTHINK NEW MEXICO: $97,000 · Human ServicesTHINK NEW MEXIC…NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $75,000 · Human ServicesTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $71,500 · Human Services+10 more: $209,400 · Human Services+10 moreGERARD'S HOUSE: $191,000 · HealthGERARD'S H…BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE: $181,000 · HealthBREATH OF …Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation: $156,000 · HealthPresbyteri…ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $125,000 · HealthST VINCENT…SANTA FE BIRTH CENTER: $100,000 · HealthSANTA FE B…SANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC: $85,000 · HealthSANTA FE R…NEW MEXICO ALLIANCE FOR SCHOOL- BASED HEALTH CARE: $56,500 · HealthKIDS COUNSELING INC: $55,000 · HealthFIRST CHOICE COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE INC: $45,500 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $45,350 · Health+4 more: $70,000 · Health+4 moreNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $350,000 · Civil RightsYouth Heartline: $141,500 · Civil RightsSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO: $105,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $76,000 · Civil RightsTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND: $57,500 · Civil RightsSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $279,000 · PhilanthropyGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC: $95,000 · PhilanthropyPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO CASA ASSOCIATION INC: $57,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TAOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $20,500 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY: $170,150 · Crime & LegalNEW MEXICO KIDS MATTER INC: $117,000 · Crime & LegalPegasus Legal Services for Children: $40,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $100 · Crime & Legal
Other$5,935,700Education$1,726,500Human Services$1,680,100Health$1,110,350Civil Rights$730,000Philanthropy$616,500Crime & Legal$327,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER: $597,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $440,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $350,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $327,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY FOUND: $285,000 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $279,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $275,600 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $268,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetNew Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children: $242,000 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $225,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $215,100 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetMany Mothers Inc: $193,000 over 8y, 25% of budgetGERARD'S HOUSE: $191,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $187,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE: $181,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetNEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY: $170,150 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetPresbyterian Healthcare Foundation: $156,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetYouth Heartline: $141,500 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $131,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetNEW MEXICO CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORKS: $130,500 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetRAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY: $128,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO KIDS MATTER INC: $117,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetEsperanza Shelter Inc: $116,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTwirl A Play and Discovery Space Inc: $114,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $110,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetPROSPERITY WORKS: $105,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO: $105,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetNEW VISTAS: $103,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSANTA FE BIRTH CENTER: $100,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO: $97,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetSAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $97,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSEARCHLIGHT NEW MEXICO NEWS: $90,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetSANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $77,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $76,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $75,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $71,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND: $57,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNEW MEXICO CASA ASSOCIATION INC: $57,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $57,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO ALLIANCE FOR SCHOOL- BASED HEALTH CARE: $56,500 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetKIDS COUNSELING INC: $55,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE: $55,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SANTA FE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY FOUND ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Many Mothers Inc ↗
  • Who funds GERARD'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY ↗
  • Who funds Presbyterian Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Youth Heartline ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORKS ↗
  • Who funds RAILYARD PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO KIDS MATTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Esperanza Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds Twirl A Play and Discovery Space Inc ↗
  • Who funds KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROSPERITY WORKS ↗
  • Who funds SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO ↗
  • Who funds NEW VISTAS ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE BIRTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THINK NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds SAN JUAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Con Alma Health Found…Marshall L and Perrin…Nusenda FoundationAnchorum St VincentAlbuquerque Community…Thornburg FoundationNew Mexico Community …The Frost FoundationSt Vincent HospitalLos Alamos National L…Pnm Tnmp Foundation
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM127.2× affinity65 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Nusenda Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · The Frost Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brindle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brindle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Brindle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Brindle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 198 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brindle’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home